A divisionDivision No. 321 · Tuesday, 21 October 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Sentencing Bill Committee: Amendment 24

182Ayes
307Noes
Defeated · majority 125 · Government won
157 did not vote
Aye184No308DID NOT VOTE · 157

646 Members · Aye 182 · No 307 · DNV 157 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 21 October 2025 on amendment 24 to the Sentencing Bill, tabled by Dr Kieran Mullan (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle). The amendment sought to widen the range of serious offences explicitly excluded from the Bill's earlier release provisions, with supporters arguing it was necessary to prevent rapists and child sex offenders from benefiting from reduced time in prison. The Committee of the whole House defeated the amendment by 307 votes to 182. The Sentencing Bill resets statutory release points for prisoners serving Standard Determinate Sentences, establishing a minimum release point of one third for sentences currently released at 40 or 50 per cent. The amendment addressed whether the most serious sexual offenders would be caught by the Bill's existing exclusions or would in practice benefit from earlier release. Supporters of the amendment argued that thousands of people convicted of rape and child sexual abuse were not in fact excluded, meaning they would be released earlier than under the current system. The government held that existing exclusions were already sufficient. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 90 voting Conservative MPs and all 65 voting Liberal Democrats supported the amendment, as did the Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, and the Green Party. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted overwhelmingly against, with only one Labour MP voting with the amendment. The vote came during Committee stage of the whole House, a format Dr Mullan himself criticised for limiting scrutiny compared with a conventional Public Bill Committee.

Voting Aye meant
Support widening the exemptions from early release to explicitly cover rape and child sexual abuse offences, arguing the Bill as drafted allows serious sex offenders to benefit from reduced sentences.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, maintaining that the Bill's existing exclusions are sufficient and that the amendment is unnecessary or would undermine the broader sentencing reform package.
§ 01Who voted how.489 voting Members · 157 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
279
81
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
9
3
1
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.4 principal speakers
Esther McVeyOpposedTatton
Opposes the Bill as fundamentally undermining law and order by forcing suspended sentences when imprisonment is appropriate; advocates for narrower application of presumption and tougher exclusions for serious offences including knife crime.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,517 words)
Sally JamesonSupportiveDoncaster Central
Defends the Bill against accusations that it undermines law and order; argues the previous Conservative government nearly collapsed the prison system through poor management.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (255 words)
Sir Desmond SwayneOpposedNew Forest West
Supports McVey's position that the Bill is worse than the previous approach; argues active prison management was preferable to reducing incarceration.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (186 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Concerned that the Bill removes deterrent effect for knife crime; argues sentencing must be carried out and deterrents maintained, citing tragic family impacts in constituencies.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (95 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0