Finance Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Tuesday, 10 December 2024 · Division No. 60 · Commons
219 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support requiring a government report on the revenue impact of scrapping the oil and gas investment allowance, ensuring fiscal transparency and accountability
Voting No means
Oppose the reporting requirement, likely viewing it as unnecessary given existing scrutiny mechanisms or OBR assessments already covering this ground
What happened: On 10 December 2024, the House of Commons, sitting as a Committee of the whole House, voted on New Clause 2 to the Finance Bill. The new clause would have required the Chancellor to publish, within six months of the Act passing, a report setting out the fiscal impact of changes to the Energy Profits Levy investment expenditure relief contained in Clause 16. The motion was defeated by 350 votes to 74.
Why it matters: The Energy Profits Levy (sometimes called the windfall tax) is the additional tax charged on the profits of oil and gas companies operating in the North Sea. Clause 16 of the Finance Bill made changes to investment expenditure relief within that levy, specifically abolishing the core investment allowance that had previously allowed oil and gas companies to offset a substantial portion of their spending against the levy. New Clause 2 would not have changed the policy itself but would have required the government to formally assess and publish the revenue consequences of that change. By voting it down, the government kept the changes in place without being legally required to produce that specific fiscal report. The practical consequences of the underlying policy are significant for the North Sea energy sector, with industry bodies warning of job losses and reduced capital investment, particularly in Scotland.
The politics: The 74 votes in favour came predominantly from the Liberal Democrats (65 votes), with additional support from Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the Alliance Party and the Ulster Unionist Party. Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs voted uniformly against, providing the bulk of the 350 no votes. The Conservatives, despite being the official opposition, were entirely absent from this division, meaning the only substantial opposition voices in the lobby came from smaller parties. The vote sits within a wider legislative process: the Finance Bill subsequently passed its Third Reading in March 2025 by 339 votes to 172, suggesting the government's Budget tax measures remained broadly intact throughout.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Grantham and Bourne
CGT changes contradict Labour's pro-growth rhetoric, create perverse incentives to sell businesses before April 2025, risk retrospective anti-forestalling rules, and carried interest measure costs £4.5m to raise zero revenue.
Conservative · Gordon and Buchan
Energy levy increases risk 26% lower capex, 6.3% lower oil and 9.2% lower gas production per OBR; removal of investment allowance jeopardises 200,000 jobs; new clause 3 review essential given Aberdeen warnings.
SNP · Angus and Perthshire Glens
CGT reform is incomplete technocratic fix; should have fundamentally redesigned CGT following IFS guidance on indexation, asset-specific rates, and wealth tax; clauses do nothing for Scotland's economy.
Liberal Democrat · St Albans
CGT increase is suboptimal; should instead introduce indexation allowance, three-rate structure, and higher allowance to raise £5.2bn (vs £2.5bn) while being fairer to ordinary savers and long-term investors.
Voted Aye
Labour · Carshalton and Wallington
While supporting progressive taxation, CGT reform incomplete: should index gains for inflation, target smaller gains, reform reliefs, and close Monaco loophole to truly be fair; cannot support unamended clause.
Voted Aye
Labour · Hampstead and Highgate
CGT rate increases (10%→18%, 20%→24%) and carried interest reform are necessary to repair £22bn fiscal gap while remaining internationally competitive; phased BADR increases protect entrepreneurs.
Voted No
Labour · Earley and Woodley
CGT increases address tax avoidance gap between CGT and income tax rates; entrepreneurial investment depends on infrastructure/skills not exit taxation; Budget supports that vision.
Voted No
Labour · Ealing North
Energy profits levy increase (35%→38%) and abolition of 29% investment allowance necessary to fund energy transition while maintaining decarbonisation allowance; ESIM price floor provides certainty; consultation on post-2030 regime planned.
Voted No
Related Votes
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 8
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: Amendment 67
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill: Third Reading
3 Mar 2025
Opposition Day: Family businesses
26 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 1
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 6
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 4
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 2
24 Feb 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
15 Jan 2025