Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 2

Monday, 24 February 2025 · Division No. 104 · Commons

61Ayes
316Noes
Defeated

273 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment defeatedPro Fishing Community Rights(Yes)Pro Marine Environment Protection(Yes)Pro Community Consultation(Yes)Pro Energy Development Streamlining(No)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring the Crown Estate to formally coordinate with marine planning bodies and consult fishing communities when making decisions about seabed use, ensuring their interests are protected alongside energy development.

Voting No means

Oppose adding this specific consultation requirement to the Bill, arguing that existing planning and environmental assessment processes already provide sufficient protection for fishing communities and the marine environment.

What happened: On 24 February 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 2 to the Crown Estate Bill [Lords] at Report Stage. The amendment sought to require the Crown Estate to share revenues more directly with local communities affected by its developments, particularly those related to offshore wind and other energy projects. The amendment was defeated by 316 votes to 61.

Why it matters: The amendment would have redirected a portion of Crown Estate revenues away from the central Treasury and towards communities hosting or adjacent to Crown Estate developments, including coastal communities affected by offshore wind leasing. Under the existing model, Crown Estate profits flow to the Treasury and are redistributed through general public spending, including via the Barnett formula for devolved nations. Supporters of the amendment argued that communities bearing the direct impact of large-scale energy infrastructure should receive a more tangible and local financial benefit. The government's position is that the current centralised model maximises the commercial returns that are ultimately reinvested across all public services, and that introducing local revenue-sharing obligations would complicate the Crown Estate's investment activities.

The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 310 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment. The 61 votes in favour came predominantly from the Liberal Democrats (50 ayes), with the remainder split between Plaid Cymru (4), the Green Party (4), one Ulster Unionist, and one Independent. The debate sat within a broader set of arguments about whether the Crown Estate Bill adequately benefits devolved nations and local communities, with Welsh MPs pressing strongly for devolution of Crown Estate powers to Wales, and Northern Irish and fishing community representatives seeking protections for coastal industries. The government resisted all such redistribution and devolution proposals throughout the Bill's passage.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/281 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
50 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/29 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Independent
1 Aye/2 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Llinos Medi

Plaid Cymru · Ynys Môn

Opposed

New Clause 1 proposes devolving Welsh Crown Estate management to Welsh Government within two years, arguing Wales should control and benefit from its natural resources like Scotland does.

Voted Aye

Jim Allister

DUP · North Antrim

Opposed

Opposes New Clause 7 (devolution to Northern Ireland Executive) as impractical given Stormont's dysfunction and Lough Foyle's contentious status with Republic of Ireland.

Voted No

James Wild

Conservative · North West Norfolk

Neutral

Backs Amendment 4 (25% borrowing cap), New Clause 5 (Treasury approval for 10%+ asset disposals), and New Clause 6 (publish GB Energy partnership agreement) to ensure parliamentary oversight.

Steff Aquarone

Labour · North Norfolk

Neutral

Backs Amendment 3 requiring Crown Estate to assess coastal erosion protections where offshore projects make landfall, citing unfair disparity between energy infrastructure and community protection.

Voted Aye

Henry Tufnell

Labour · Mid and South Pembrokeshire

Supportive

Supports the Bill but backs Amendment 5 to require Crown Estate to have regard to net zero, regional economic growth and energy security as defined duties, rejecting ESG window-dressing.

Voted No

Pippa Heylings

Liberal Democrat · South Cambridgeshire

Supportive

Supports Bill but backs Amendment 2 (define sustainable development with climate and nature duty) and New Clause 3 (5% of profits to local communities) to ensure accountability and community benefits.

Voted Aye

Matt Rodda

Labour · Reading Central

Supportive

Supports the Bill as modernising Crown Estate to accelerate net zero and energy security; opposes new clauses and amendments as unnecessary restrictions on Crown Estate's flexibility.

Voted No

James Murray

Labour (Minister) · Ealing North

Supportive

Rejects devolution to Wales and Northern Ireland as commercially unviable and disruptive to grid connectivity and offshore wind investment; maintains existing structure benefits all UK nations.

Voted No

Related Votes