A divisionDivision No. 111 · Monday, 3 March 2025· Commons· Taxation

Finance Bill Report Stage: Amendment 67

167Ayes
347Noes
Defeated · majority 180 · Government won
136 did not vote
Aye167No346DID NOT VOTE · 136

650 Members · Aye 167 · No 347 · DNV 136 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 3 March 2025 on whether to remove the VAT charge on private school fees as part of the Finance Bill's report stage. Amendment 67, tabled by Conservative MP James Wild alongside related amendments 68 and 69, would have deleted clauses 47 to 49 of the Finance Bill, which stripped independent schools of their VAT exemption and imposed the standard 20% rate on education fees from January 2025. The amendment was defeated by 347 votes to 167, Division 111. The vote confirms that the VAT charge on private school fees, which took effect on 1 January 2025, remains in law. The government argues the policy will raise £1.7 billion by the final year of this Parliament, money it says is directed at state school improvements and related education commitments. Removing the exemption means independent schools either absorb the additional cost or pass it on through higher fees, affecting families currently paying for private education. The measure is the first time education as a category has been subject to VAT in the UK. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 290 Labour MPs and 37 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, giving the government a commanding majority. The Conservatives provided 94 of the 167 ayes, joined by all 59 voting Liberal Democrats, 6 Reform UK MPs, and 3 Democratic Unionists. The SNP, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens all voted no. The Liberal Democrats' support for the amendment is notable given their general positioning, though no cross-party Labour rebels were recorded. This vote sits alongside a related division on 31 March 2025, when MPs voted 301 to 167 to reject Lords amendments to the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill, suggesting consistent parliamentary support for the broader private schools VAT policy.

Voting Aye meant
Support removing VAT on private school fees, arguing education should not be taxed and the policy hits modest-income families who sacrifice to send children to independent schools.
Voting No meant
Oppose removing VAT on private school fees, defending the measure as raising £1.7 billion for state education and challenging opponents to explain what they would cut instead.
§ 01Who voted how.514 voting Members · 136 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
290
71
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
37
5
Independent
2
3
9
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
7
2
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes Finance Bill measures including state pension tax, energy profits levy hike, and VAT on independent schools; seeks impact reviews to expose harm to pensioners, businesses, and energy security.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,995 words)
Dr Jeevun SandherSupportiveLoughborough
Supports Finance Bill as necessary to ensure economic growth benefits are shared fairly across all income levels, demographics, and regions; backs investments in skills, housing, and childcare.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,075 words)
Daisy CooperQuestioningSt Albans
Seeks impact assessments on SMEs, households, alcohol duty impacts on distilleries/wine trade, and SEND pupils without EHCPs; opposes VAT on private schools but requests evidence of harm.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,711 words)
Jim DicksonSupportiveDartford
Defends Finance Bill as fixing an unfair tax system inherited from 14 years of Conservative government; argues most requested data already published; dismisses new clauses as duplicate work.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,061 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Condemns Bill as breaking manifesto promises, punishing businesses through NI hikes, attacking farmers with inheritance tax, and stifling growth; calls for impact assessments of damage.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,064 words)
Nesil CaliskanSupportiveBarking
Supports Bill's non-dom changes, energy profits levy, and VAT on private schools as fair taxation choices; backs long-term stability in energy markets alongside immediate price relief.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (864 words)
Mr Paul KohlerOpposedWimbledon
Opposes VAT on private schools; warns of adverse impacts on SEND pupils and wine industry; criticises impractical alcohol duty regime creating 30 different duty rates for wine.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,434 words)
Jim ShannonOpposedStrangford
Supports new clauses 2, 7, 8 as impact assessments; warns of VAT harm to faith schools and distilleries in Northern Ireland; opposes NI contributions rise.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,123 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0