Finance Bill Report Stage: Amendment 67

Monday, 3 March 2025 · Division No. 111 · Commons

167Ayes
347Noes
Defeated

136 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedPro Energy Sector Scrutiny(Yes)Anti Windfall Tax Increase(Yes)Pro Energy Security(Yes)Pro Fiscal Transparency(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring a formal review of how the higher windfall tax on oil and gas profits affects UK energy production, security, prices, and the economy

Voting No means

Oppose mandating a separate impact assessment, arguing the government has already assessed the policy and the levy increase should proceed without delay

Parliament voted on Amendment 67 to the Finance Bill at Report Stage on 3 March 2025. The amendment was tabled by Conservative MPs and sought to remove or modify specific tax increases contained in the Bill. The government defeated the amendment by 347 votes to 167, a majority of 180.

The Finance Bill gives legal effect to the measures announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's October 2024 Budget, described by the government as a growth Budget. The amendment targeted a range of tax changes that opponents argued would damage the economy, reduce business investment and harm household finances. These included the increase in employers' national insurance contributions, the extension and rate increase of the energy profits levy on North sea oil and gas producers, the removal of the VAT exemption for independent schools, and changes to inheritance tax and business property relief. Defeating the amendment means all these measures remain on course to become law.

The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 291 Labour MPs and 37 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, as did all seven SNP members, all four Plaid Cymru members and all four Green MPs. On the other side, all 94 voting Conservatives, all 59 voting Liberal Democrats, all six voting Reform UK members and three Democratic Unionist Party members supported the amendment. Three independents voted for it and two against. The Liberal Democrats, despite voting with the Conservatives here, expressed their own distinct objections, particularly on private school VAT and small business impacts, rather than fully endorsing the Conservative position. There were no notable Labour rebels.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/291 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
59 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/37 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/7 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
6 Aye/0 No
Independent
3 Aye/2 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

James Wild

Conservative · North West Norfolk

Opposed

Opposes Finance Bill measures including state pension tax, energy profits levy hike, and VAT on independent schools; seeks impact reviews to expose harm to pensioners, businesses, and energy security.

Voted Aye

Sir Ashley Fox

Conservative · Bridgwater

Opposed

Condemns Bill as breaking manifesto promises, punishing businesses through NI hikes, attacking farmers with inheritance tax, and stifling growth; calls for impact assessments of damage.

Voted Aye

Mr Paul Kohler

Liberal Democrat · Wimbledon

Opposed

Opposes VAT on private schools; warns of adverse impacts on SEND pupils and wine industry; criticises impractical alcohol duty regime creating 30 different duty rates for wine.

Voted Aye

Jim Shannon

DUP · Strangford

Opposed

Supports new clauses 2, 7, 8 as impact assessments; warns of VAT harm to faith schools and distilleries in Northern Ireland; opposes NI contributions rise.

Voted Aye

Daisy Cooper

Liberal Democrat · St Albans

Questioning

Seeks impact assessments on SMEs, households, alcohol duty impacts on distilleries/wine trade, and SEND pupils without EHCPs; opposes VAT on private schools but requests evidence of harm.

Voted Aye

Dr Jeevun Sandher

Labour · Loughborough

Supportive

Supports Finance Bill as necessary to ensure economic growth benefits are shared fairly across all income levels, demographics, and regions; backs investments in skills, housing, and childcare.

Voted No

Jim Dickson

Labour · Dartford

Supportive

Defends Finance Bill as fixing an unfair tax system inherited from 14 years of Conservative government; argues most requested data already published; dismisses new clauses as duplicate work.

Voted No

Nesil Caliskan

Labour · Barking

Supportive

Supports Bill's non-dom changes, energy profits levy, and VAT on private schools as fair taxation choices; backs long-term stability in energy markets alongside immediate price relief.

Voted No

Related Votes