A divisionDivision No. 110 · Monday, 3 March 2025· Commons· Taxation

Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 8

176Ayes
332Noes
Defeated · majority 156 · Government won
138 did not vote
Aye178No333DID NOT VOTE · 138

646 Members · Aye 176 · No 332 · DNV 138 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 3 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 8 during the Report Stage of the Finance Bill. New Clause 8 would have required the government to review the impact of alcohol duty increases on key sectors, including the Scotch whisky industry. The motion was defeated by 332 votes to 176. The division was one of several opposition amendments considered on the same day, covering topics ranging from the energy profits levy to VAT on private school fees and the impact of the Budget on pensioners and small businesses. The Finance Bill gives legal force to the tax and spending measures announced in the October 2024 Budget. New Clause 8 sought to compel the Chancellor to publish an assessment of how alcohol duty changes would affect industries such as Scotch whisky, which the debate noted accounts for 22 percent of the United Kingdom's food and drink exports and supports tens of thousands of jobs. By defeating the amendment, the government maintained its Budget measures on alcohol duty without any statutory obligation to assess their sectoral impact. More broadly, the Report Stage debate covered concerns about the national insurance contributions rise, the increase in the energy profits levy on North sea oil and gas, the extension of VAT to independent school fees, and the fiscal pressure on pensioners, with opposition members arguing these measures collectively reduce growth, investment and household incomes. The vote followed strict party lines. All 326 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, providing the government's majority. The Conservatives (93 ayes), Liberal Democrats (60 ayes), Scottish National Party (7 ayes), Reform UK (5 ayes), Plaid Cymru (4 ayes) and the Democratic Unionist Party (3 ayes) all voted in favour, forming a broad but ultimately insufficient cross-party opposition bloc. The Green Party (4 votes) sided with the government. The result reflects the government's comfortable working majority at this stage of the Parliament and sits within a wider pattern of opposition attempts to amend the Finance Bill being defeated, consistent with other related divisions in early 2025.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to publish an impact assessment of alcohol taxation changes, including both revenue raised and administrative/compliance burdens on the hospitality industry
Voting No meant
Oppose the mandatory impact assessment requirement, either defending existing government analysis as sufficient or rejecting the procedural addition to the Finance Bill
§ 01Who voted how.508 voting Members · 138 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
288
73
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
93
0
23
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
37
5
Independent
3
3
8
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
James WildOpposedNorth West Norfolk
Opposes Finance Bill measures including state pension tax, energy profits levy hike, and VAT on independent schools; seeks impact reviews to expose harm to pensioners, businesses, and energy security.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,995 words)
Dr Jeevun SandherSupportiveLoughborough
Supports Finance Bill as necessary to ensure economic growth benefits are shared fairly across all income levels, demographics, and regions; backs investments in skills, housing, and childcare.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,075 words)
Daisy CooperQuestioningSt Albans
Seeks impact assessments on SMEs, households, alcohol duty impacts on distilleries/wine trade, and SEND pupils without EHCPs; opposes VAT on private schools but requests evidence of harm.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,711 words)
Jim DicksonSupportiveDartford
Defends Finance Bill as fixing an unfair tax system inherited from 14 years of Conservative government; argues most requested data already published; dismisses new clauses as duplicate work.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,061 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Condemns Bill as breaking manifesto promises, punishing businesses through NI hikes, attacking farmers with inheritance tax, and stifling growth; calls for impact assessments of damage.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,064 words)
Nesil CaliskanSupportiveBarking
Supports Bill's non-dom changes, energy profits levy, and VAT on private schools as fair taxation choices; backs long-term stability in energy markets alongside immediate price relief.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (864 words)
Mr Paul KohlerOpposedWimbledon
Opposes VAT on private schools; warns of adverse impacts on SEND pupils and wine industry; criticises impractical alcohol duty regime creating 30 different duty rates for wine.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,434 words)
Jim ShannonOpposedStrangford
Supports new clauses 2, 7, 8 as impact assessments; warns of VAT harm to faith schools and distilleries in Northern Ireland; opposes NI contributions rise.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,123 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0