Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 8

Monday, 3 March 2025 · Division No. 110 · Commons

176Ayes
332Noes
Defeated

138 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment defeatedPro Fiscal Transparency(Yes)Pro Hospitality Industry(Yes)Anti Regulatory Burden(Yes)Pro Government Accountability(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring the government to publish an impact assessment of alcohol taxation changes, including both revenue raised and administrative/compliance burdens on the hospitality industry

Voting No means

Oppose the mandatory impact assessment requirement, either defending existing government analysis as sufficient or rejecting the procedural addition to the Finance Bill

What happened

On 3 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 8 during the Report Stage of the Finance Bill. New Clause 8 would have required the government to review the impact of alcohol duty increases on key sectors, including the Scotch whisky industry. The motion was defeated by 332 votes to 176. The division was one of several opposition amendments considered on the same day, covering topics ranging from the energy profits levy to VAT on private school fees and the impact of the Budget on pensioners and small businesses.

Why it matters

The Finance Bill gives legal force to the tax and spending measures announced in the October 2024 Budget. New Clause 8 sought to compel the Chancellor to publish an assessment of how alcohol duty changes would affect industries such as Scotch whisky, which the debate noted accounts for 22 percent of the United Kingdom's food and drink exports and supports tens of thousands of jobs. By defeating the amendment, the government maintained its Budget measures on alcohol duty without any statutory obligation to assess their sectoral impact. More broadly, the Report Stage debate covered concerns about the national insurance contributions rise, the increase in the energy profits levy on North sea oil and gas, the extension of VAT to independent school fees, and the fiscal pressure on pensioners, with opposition members arguing these measures collectively reduce growth, investment and household incomes.

The politics

The vote followed strict party lines. All 326 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, providing the government's majority. The Conservatives (93 ayes), Liberal Democrats (60 ayes), Scottish National Party (7 ayes), Reform UK (5 ayes), Plaid Cymru (4 ayes) and the Democratic Unionist Party (3 ayes) all voted in favour, forming a broad but ultimately insufficient cross-party opposition bloc. The Green Party (4 votes) sided with the government. The result reflects the government's comfortable working majority at this stage of the Parliament and sits within a wider pattern of opposition attempts to amend the Finance Bill being defeated, consistent with other related divisions in early 2025.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/289 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
93 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
60 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/37 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
7 Aye/0 No
Independent
4 Aye/2 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

James Wild

Conservative · North West Norfolk

Opposed

Opposes Finance Bill measures including state pension tax, energy profits levy hike, and VAT on independent schools; seeks impact reviews to expose harm to pensioners, businesses, and energy security.

Voted Aye

Sir Ashley Fox

Conservative · Bridgwater

Opposed

Condemns Bill as breaking manifesto promises, punishing businesses through NI hikes, attacking farmers with inheritance tax, and stifling growth; calls for impact assessments of damage.

Voted Aye

Mr Paul Kohler

Liberal Democrat · Wimbledon

Opposed

Opposes VAT on private schools; warns of adverse impacts on SEND pupils and wine industry; criticises impractical alcohol duty regime creating 30 different duty rates for wine.

Voted Aye

Jim Shannon

DUP · Strangford

Opposed

Supports new clauses 2, 7, 8 as impact assessments; warns of VAT harm to faith schools and distilleries in Northern Ireland; opposes NI contributions rise.

Voted Aye

Daisy Cooper

Liberal Democrat · St Albans

Questioning

Seeks impact assessments on SMEs, households, alcohol duty impacts on distilleries/wine trade, and SEND pupils without EHCPs; opposes VAT on private schools but requests evidence of harm.

Voted Aye

Dr Jeevun Sandher

Labour · Loughborough

Supportive

Supports Finance Bill as necessary to ensure economic growth benefits are shared fairly across all income levels, demographics, and regions; backs investments in skills, housing, and childcare.

Voted No

Jim Dickson

Labour · Dartford

Supportive

Defends Finance Bill as fixing an unfair tax system inherited from 14 years of Conservative government; argues most requested data already published; dismisses new clauses as duplicate work.

Voted No

Nesil Caliskan

Labour · Barking

Supportive

Supports Bill's non-dom changes, energy profits levy, and VAT on private schools as fair taxation choices; backs long-term stability in energy markets alongside immediate price relief.

Voted No

Related Votes