Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 8
176Ayes
332Noes
Defeated · majority 156 · Government won138 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 176 · No 332 · DNV 138 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 3 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 8 to the Finance Bill at report stage. The clause would have required the government to publish an impact assessment of the Bill's alcohol duty measures on distilleries, wine producers and the hospitality industry, including an estimate of the administrative and operational costs already incurred by those sectors over the preceding twelve months. The motion was defeated by 332 votes to 176, Division 110. The vote concerned whether ministers should be required to assess the regulatory and financial burden of alcohol duty changes on specific parts of the drinks and hospitality sector. Supporters of the new clause argued that the changes create significant red tape and push up costs for producers and consumers alike, and that an impact assessment covering administrative burdens already incurred, not just future tax revenue, was essential for proper scrutiny. The government's position was that existing published material from HMRC, the Office for Budget Responsibility and the Department for Work and Pensions, including tax information and impact notes and the "Impact on households" report, already provided sufficient information. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 325 Labour and Labour and Co-operative members who voted opposed the new clause, as did four Green MPs. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru and Democratic Unionist Party member who voted supported it, along with three independents. Three other independents voted no. The new clause was one of several opposition impact assessment requirements tabled at report stage, covering areas from energy profits levy to private schools and household finances.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the Treasury to publish an impact assessment of alcohol duty changes on distilleries, wine producers and the hospitality industry, including the regulatory burden imposed on those sectors.
Voting No meant
Oppose the requirement for a separate impact assessment, arguing that sufficient information is already published by HMRC, the OBR and the Department for Work and Pensions through tax information and impact notes.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
288
73
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
93
0
23
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
37
5
Independent
—
3
3
8
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes Finance Bill measures including state pension tax, energy profits levy hike, and VAT on independent schools; seeks impact reviews to expose harm to pensioners, businesses, and energy security.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,995 words) →
Supports Finance Bill as necessary to ensure economic growth benefits are shared fairly across all income levels, demographics, and regions; backs investments in skills, housing, and childcare.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,075 words) →
Seeks impact assessments on SMEs, households, alcohol duty impacts on distilleries/wine trade, and SEND pupils without EHCPs; opposes VAT on private schools but requests evidence of harm.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,711 words) →
Defends Finance Bill as fixing an unfair tax system inherited from 14 years of Conservative government; argues most requested data already published; dismisses new clauses as duplicate work.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,061 words) →
Condemns Bill as breaking manifesto promises, punishing businesses through NI hikes, attacking farmers with inheritance tax, and stifling growth; calls for impact assessments of damage.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,064 words) →
Supports Bill's non-dom changes, energy profits levy, and VAT on private schools as fair taxation choices; backs long-term stability in energy markets alongside immediate price relief.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (864 words) →
Opposes VAT on private schools; warns of adverse impacts on SEND pupils and wine industry; criticises impractical alcohol duty regime creating 30 different duty rates for wine.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,434 words) →
Supports new clauses 2, 7, 8 as impact assessments; warns of VAT harm to faith schools and distilleries in Northern Ireland; opposes NI contributions rise.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,123 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0