Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2

Monday, 3 March 2025 · Division No. 109 · Commons

113Ayes
331Noes
Defeated

202 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedPro Domestic Energy Production(Yes)Anti Energy Profits Levy Increase(Yes)Pro Fiscal Transparency(Yes)Pro Public Services Funding(No)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring a formal impact assessment of the increased Energy Profits Levy, arguing the government should be transparent about risks to domestic energy production, energy security, prices, and the broader economy.

Voting No means

Oppose the mandatory impact assessment, backing the government's decision to raise the levy as a legitimate way to fund public services, and arguing scrutiny can happen through existing parliamentary channels.

What happened: On 3 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 2 during the Report Stage of the Finance Bill. The clause, tabled by Conservative MPs, would have required the Chancellor of the Exchequer to commission and publish an assessment of the expected impact of increases to the Energy (Oil and Gas) Profits Levy on domestic energy production, energy security, energy prices and the wider UK economy. The amendment was defeated by 331 votes to 113.

Why it matters: The Finance Bill implements the October 2024 Budget, including raising the Energy Profits Levy from 35% to 38%, extending it by one year and removing investment allowances, bringing the headline tax rate on North Sea oil and gas activities to 78%. New Clause 2 did not seek to reverse those changes but would have required a formal government assessment of their consequences within six months of the Act coming into force. Opponents of the levy changes argue that the increases risk choking off investment in domestic energy production, threatening tens of thousands of jobs and undermining the UK's energy security, particularly at a time of global geopolitical uncertainty. Supporters of the government's position argue the levy raises necessary revenue and that high tax rates on oil and gas profits are compatible with maintaining a productive energy sector, pointing to Norway as an example.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 323 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted against the amendment, while Conservatives (93 votes), the SNP (7), Plaid Cymru (4), Reform UK (4), the DUP (3) and the Traditional Unionist Voice (1) voted in favour, alongside two independents. The Green Party sided with the government, casting 4 votes against the clause. There were no notable cross-party rebels on either side. The result reflects the government's comfortable Commons majority. The Finance Bill debate also covered a range of related contested measures including the VAT treatment of private school fees, the national insurance contributions increase, state pension income tax thresholds and the impact on small businesses, all of which have been points of sustained Conservative and Liberal Democrat attack since the Budget was delivered in October 2024.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/286 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
93 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/37 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
7 Aye/0 No
Independent
2 Aye/4 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

James Wild

Conservative · North West Norfolk

Opposed

Opposes Finance Bill measures including state pension tax, energy profits levy hike, and VAT on independent schools; seeks impact reviews to expose harm to pensioners, businesses, and energy security.

Voted Aye

Sir Ashley Fox

Conservative · Bridgwater

Opposed

Condemns Bill as breaking manifesto promises, punishing businesses through NI hikes, attacking farmers with inheritance tax, and stifling growth; calls for impact assessments of damage.

Voted Aye

Mr Paul Kohler

Liberal Democrat · Wimbledon

Opposed

Opposes VAT on private schools; warns of adverse impacts on SEND pupils and wine industry; criticises impractical alcohol duty regime creating 30 different duty rates for wine.

Jim Shannon

DUP · Strangford

Opposed

Supports new clauses 2, 7, 8 as impact assessments; warns of VAT harm to faith schools and distilleries in Northern Ireland; opposes NI contributions rise.

Voted Aye

Daisy Cooper

Liberal Democrat · St Albans

Questioning

Seeks impact assessments on SMEs, households, alcohol duty impacts on distilleries/wine trade, and SEND pupils without EHCPs; opposes VAT on private schools but requests evidence of harm.

Dr Jeevun Sandher

Labour · Loughborough

Supportive

Supports Finance Bill as necessary to ensure economic growth benefits are shared fairly across all income levels, demographics, and regions; backs investments in skills, housing, and childcare.

Voted No

Jim Dickson

Labour · Dartford

Supportive

Defends Finance Bill as fixing an unfair tax system inherited from 14 years of Conservative government; argues most requested data already published; dismisses new clauses as duplicate work.

Voted No

Nesil Caliskan

Labour · Barking

Supportive

Supports Bill's non-dom changes, energy profits levy, and VAT on private schools as fair taxation choices; backs long-term stability in energy markets alongside immediate price relief.

Voted No

Related Votes