A divisionDivision No. 103 · Monday, 24 February 2025· Commons· Energy

Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 4

153Ayes
316Noes
Defeated · majority 163 · Government won
178 did not vote
Aye155No317DID NOT VOTE · 178

647 Members · Aye 153 · No 316 · DNV 178 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 24 February 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 4 to the Crown Estate Bill at Report Stage. The amendment, tabled by Conservative MP James Wild, sought to introduce enhanced parliamentary scrutiny and oversight of the Crown Estate's operations, particularly in light of the Bill's expansion of the Estate's borrowing and investment powers. The amendment was defeated by 316 votes to 153, with the government opposing it. The Crown Estate manages assets worth approximately £15.5 billion, including vast amounts of coastal land and seabed that are central to the UK's offshore wind and renewable energy ambitions. The Bill grants the Crown Estate new powers to borrow and invest, making it a significant vehicle for delivering the government's net zero energy targets. Amendment 4 sought to attach greater parliamentary accountability to these expanded powers, including scrutiny of how borrowing and investment decisions are made. Its defeat means the Crown Estate will proceed with its new commercial freedoms under existing governance arrangements, without the additional oversight mechanisms the opposition sought. This is particularly relevant given that the Crown Estate's public framework document, which was to give context to the Bill's sustainable development clause, had not been shared with the House before the vote. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 310 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, and most smaller parties voted in favour. Reform UK provided two votes in support. There were no notable rebels on either side. The debate around the amendment was intertwined with broader arguments over devolution of the Crown Estate to Wales and Northern Ireland, fishing community protections, and the pace of offshore wind development, reflecting the wide range of interests the Bill touches across the UK's nations and regions.

Voting Aye meant
Support stronger parliamentary scrutiny and accountability over the Crown Estate's expanded borrowing powers
Voting No meant
Oppose adding further obligations on the Crown Estate beyond those already in the Bill, trusting existing safeguards are sufficient
§ 01Who voted how.469 voting Members · 178 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
281
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
88
0
28
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
53
0
19
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
2
2
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Llinos MediOpposedYnys Môn
New Clause 1 proposes devolving Welsh Crown Estate management to Welsh Government within two years, arguing Wales should control and benefit from its natural resources like Scotland does.Plaid Cymru · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,349 words)
Henry TufnellSupportiveMid and South Pembrokeshire
Supports the Bill but backs Amendment 5 to require Crown Estate to have regard to net zero, regional economic growth and energy security as defined duties, rejecting ESG window-dressing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,280 words)
James WildNeutralNorth West Norfolk
Backs Amendment 4 (25% borrowing cap), New Clause 5 (Treasury approval for 10%+ asset disposals), and New Clause 6 (publish GB Energy partnership agreement) to ensure parliamentary oversight.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,277 words)
Pippa HeylingsSupportiveSouth Cambridgeshire
Supports Bill but backs Amendment 2 (define sustainable development with climate and nature duty) and New Clause 3 (5% of profits to local communities) to ensure accountability and community benefits.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,527 words)
Matt RoddaSupportiveReading Central
Supports the Bill as modernising Crown Estate to accelerate net zero and energy security; opposes new clauses and amendments as unnecessary restrictions on Crown Estate's flexibility.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (694 words)
Steff AquaroneNeutralNorth Norfolk
Backs Amendment 3 requiring Crown Estate to assess coastal erosion protections where offshore projects make landfall, citing unfair disparity between energy infrastructure and community protection.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (782 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
Opposes New Clause 7 (devolution to Northern Ireland Executive) as impractical given Stormont's dysfunction and Lough Foyle's contentious status with Republic of Ireland.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (637 words)
James MurraySupportiveEaling North
Rejects devolution to Wales and Northern Ireland as commercially unviable and disruptive to grid connectivity and offshore wind investment; maintains existing structure benefits all UK nations.Labour (Minister) · Voted no · Read full speech (5,491 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0