National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Second Reading
Tuesday, 3 December 2024 · Division No. 54 · Commons
127 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support raising employer National Insurance contributions as a necessary measure to fix public finances and fund public services without directly cutting workers' take-home pay
Voting No means
Oppose raising employer National Insurance, arguing it will reduce employment, suppress wages, and place undue burden on small businesses, charities and voluntary organisations
Parliament voted on 3 December 2024 to give a Second Reading (initial parliamentary approval) to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill, which would increase the rate of employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15% from April 2025, while simultaneously lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying the tax and doubling the employment allowance from £5,000 to £10,500. The bill passed by 332 votes to 189, with the government carrying the vote comfortably.
The bill is the legislative mechanism for one of the central tax measures announced in the October 2024 Budget. It raises revenue that the government says will fund an additional £22.6 billion in NHS resource spending, including 40,000 extra elective appointments per week, as well as supporting wider public service investment. The increase affects employers across the economy, though the government argues that the doubled employment allowance means over half of all employers will pay the same or less than before, and that 865,000 employers will pay no employer National Insurance at all in the following year. Critics argue the measure will suppress wages, cost jobs, and push some businesses, charities, hospices, and social care providers into financial difficulty.
The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 297 Labour MPs and 32 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the bill. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, Green, and DUP member who voted opposed it. Three independents voted in favour and four against. The Conservatives moved a reasoned amendment declining to give the bill a Second Reading on the grounds that it broke Labour's manifesto commitment and would reduce growth, wages, and employment. The bill sits within a broader legislative programme that also included the Finance Bill, which subsequently passed its Third Reading in March 2025 by 339 votes to 172.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · North Bedfordshire
Opposes the Bill as breaking Labour's manifesto promise; argues it is a regressive 'jobs tax' that will suppress wages, reduce employment, and harm small businesses, charities, GPs, and hospices without justification.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · St Albans
Opposes the measure as undermining growth; calls for exemptions for health and care providers; urges consideration of alternative revenue sources (bank tax, gambling duty, digital services tax) that target the wealthy rather than businesses.
Voted No
SNP · Angus and Perthshire Glens
Challenges the Government distinction between pay packets and suppressed wages/lost jobs; notes Scottish hospitality faces particular hardship without business rates relief unlike England.
Voted No
Conservative · South Shropshire
Opposes as breaking manifesto; reports constituents in hospitality cannot see viable path forward; questions whether Government understood the fiscal situation during transition period.
Voted No
Plaid Cymru · Ceredigion Preseli
Concerned about impact on Welsh public services (30% workforce in public sector, £380m cost); seeks assurance that reimbursement to local authorities will be full and recurring.
Voted No
Labour · Ealing North
Defends the Bill as necessary to fix public finances and fund NHS; argues it protects working people (no income tax/VAT/employee NI rises) and small businesses (via doubled employment allowance to £10,500), while businesses with broadest shoulders must contribute.
Voted Aye
Labour · Basingstoke
Supports the Bill as delivering record NHS investment (£25.6bn), teacher recruitment, and school rebuilding; argues Opposition want services without paying for them and lack credible alternatives.
Voted Aye
Labour · Rochdale
Defends the Bill in context of Conservative failure; highlights the £22bn fiscal black hole and need to avoid austerity; attacks Opposition for inconsistency (they voted for health levy in 2021).
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 8
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: Amendment 67
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill: Third Reading
3 Mar 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
15 Jan 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
15 Jan 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 7
15 Jan 2025
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 1
17 Dec 2024
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 13
17 Dec 2024
National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill Committee: Amendment 23
17 Dec 2024