National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill: Second Reading

Tuesday, 3 December 2024 · Division No. 54 · Commons

332Ayes
189Noes
Passed

127 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment wonPro Employer Ni Increase(Yes)Pro Nhs Funding(Yes)Anti Business Tax Rise(No)Fiscal Responsibility(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support raising employer National Insurance contributions as a necessary measure to fix public finances and fund public services without directly cutting workers' take-home pay

Voting No means

Oppose raising employer National Insurance, arguing it will reduce employment, suppress wages, and place undue burden on small businesses, charities and voluntary organisations

Parliament voted on 3 December 2024 to give a Second Reading (initial parliamentary approval) to the National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill, which would increase the rate of employer National Insurance contributions from 13.8% to 15% from April 2025, while simultaneously lowering the threshold at which employers begin paying the tax and doubling the employment allowance from £5,000 to £10,500. The bill passed by 332 votes to 189, with the government carrying the vote comfortably.

The bill is the legislative mechanism for one of the central tax measures announced in the October 2024 Budget. It raises revenue that the government says will fund an additional £22.6 billion in NHS resource spending, including 40,000 extra elective appointments per week, as well as supporting wider public service investment. The increase affects employers across the economy, though the government argues that the doubled employment allowance means over half of all employers will pay the same or less than before, and that 865,000 employers will pay no employer National Insurance at all in the following year. Critics argue the measure will suppress wages, cost jobs, and push some businesses, charities, hospices, and social care providers into financial difficulty.

The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 297 Labour MPs and 32 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the bill. Every Conservative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, Green, and DUP member who voted opposed it. Three independents voted in favour and four against. The Conservatives moved a reasoned amendment declining to give the bill a Second Reading on the grounds that it broke Labour's manifesto commitment and would reduce growth, wages, and employment. The bill sits within a broader legislative programme that also included the Finance Bill, which subsequently passed its Third Reading in March 2025 by 339 votes to 172.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
297 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/92 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/63 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
32 Aye/0 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/9 No
Independent
3 Aye/4 No
Reform UKWhipped No
0 Aye/7 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

What They Said in the Debate

Richard Fuller

Conservative · North Bedfordshire

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as breaking Labour's manifesto promise; argues it is a regressive 'jobs tax' that will suppress wages, reduce employment, and harm small businesses, charities, GPs, and hospices without justification.

Voted No

Daisy Cooper

Liberal Democrat · St Albans

Opposed

Opposes the measure as undermining growth; calls for exemptions for health and care providers; urges consideration of alternative revenue sources (bank tax, gambling duty, digital services tax) that target the wealthy rather than businesses.

Voted No

Dave Doogan

SNP · Angus and Perthshire Glens

Opposed

Challenges the Government distinction between pay packets and suppressed wages/lost jobs; notes Scottish hospitality faces particular hardship without business rates relief unlike England.

Voted No

Stuart Anderson

Conservative · South Shropshire

Opposed

Opposes as breaking manifesto; reports constituents in hospitality cannot see viable path forward; questions whether Government understood the fiscal situation during transition period.

Voted No

Ben Lake

Plaid Cymru · Ceredigion Preseli

Questioning

Concerned about impact on Welsh public services (30% workforce in public sector, £380m cost); seeks assurance that reimbursement to local authorities will be full and recurring.

Voted No

James Murray

Labour · Ealing North

Supportive

Defends the Bill as necessary to fix public finances and fund NHS; argues it protects working people (no income tax/VAT/employee NI rises) and small businesses (via doubled employment allowance to £10,500), while businesses with broadest shoulders must contribute.

Voted Aye

Luke Murphy

Labour · Basingstoke

Supportive

Supports the Bill as delivering record NHS investment (£25.6bn), teacher recruitment, and school rebuilding; argues Opposition want services without paying for them and lack credible alternatives.

Voted Aye

Paul Waugh

Labour · Rochdale

Supportive

Defends the Bill in context of Conservative failure; highlights the £22bn fiscal black hole and need to avoid austerity; attacks Opposition for inconsistency (they voted for health levy in 2021).

Voted Aye

Related Votes