Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 7
172Ayes
341Noes
Defeated · majority 169 · Government won134 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 172 · No 341 · DNV 134 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 15 January 2025 on Amendment 7 to the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill at Report Stage. The amendment sought to extend the exemption from the removal of charitable business rates relief to private schools that serve pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) who do not hold a formal Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan, broadening the government's existing carve-out beyond schools serving only those with the most severe needs. The amendment was defeated by 341 votes to 172. The bill removes the entitlement to charitable rate relief (worth 80 per cent on occupied properties) from private schools in England that hold charitable status, effective from April 2025. The government retained a narrow exemption for schools wholly or mainly serving pupils with EHC plans. Amendment 7 would have extended that protection to schools serving pupils with lower-level SEND needs, including children who are awaiting a plan or whose needs do not meet the threshold for one. Supporters argued this would protect families who, unable to secure an EHC plan quickly or at all, had placed children in private schools to meet their needs. Opponents backed the government's position that relief should be confined to settings for the most severely affected pupils. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 300 Labour MPs and 34 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, with no Labour members voting in favour. All 98 voting Conservatives and all 63 voting Liberal Democrats supported the amendment, making this a rare instance of cross-party alignment between the two main opposition parties. Five Reform UK MPs and one Democratic Unionist Party MP also voted aye. Three Greens and three independents voted no. The government's firm majority was decisive.
Voting Aye meant
Support widening the SEND exemption so that private schools serving pupils with special educational needs below the EHC plan threshold also retain charitable rate relief, protecting families who rely on these schools while awaiting or unable to obtain a formal plan.
Voting No meant
Oppose broadening the exemption, backing the government's position that charitable rate relief should only be retained for private schools wholly or mainly serving pupils with the most severe needs as evidenced by an EHC plan.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
300
61
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
98
0
18
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
62
0
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
34
8
Independent
—
7
3
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Your Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports permanent business rates reduction for retail/hospitality/leisure but demands impact assessments and broader reform including manufacturing; opposes VAT on private schools.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,142 words) →
Warns of unintended consequences: small businesses could be 80% worse off while big chains like Starbucks gain 40% under the scheme; calls for differential impact assessment.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (649 words) →
Supports Bill as common-sense rebalancing favouring local independents over online giants; cites expert evidence that Bill benefits 98% of retail stores and has marginal impact on private schools.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (798 words) →
Opposes removal of private school charitable relief and business rate rises; cites closure of Carrdus school (120 pupils); seeks amendment to delay implementation and protect SEND schools.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (993 words) →
Criticises Bill as smoke-and-mirrors: cuts to relief offset by higher multipliers; raises will hit major employers (supermarkets, hotels, NHS); revaluation will compound increases; seeks review via New Clause 2.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,052 words) →
Defends Bill as essential to support high streets and fund state education; rejects amendments as diluting support; private schools are businesses and should pay rates like any other.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,083 words) →
Argues Bill harms SMEs, data centres, breweries, zoos, and stadiums; contradicts Labour's pre-election promise to abolish business rates; removal of private school relief harms state schools via lost facility-sharing.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,532 words) →
Backs Bill as fair and necessary; private schools are businesses and should contribute; focuses on high street support and equity in education funding for state sector.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,028 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0