Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 7
172Ayes
341Noes
Defeated · majority 169 · Government won134 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 172 · No 341 · DNV 134 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on Amendment 7 to the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill on 15 January 2025, during the Report Stage of the Bill's passage through the House of Commons. The amendment, tabled by the opposition, would have introduced transitional relief for private schools, phasing in the business rates and VAT changes over time rather than applying them immediately. The amendment was defeated by 341 votes to 172. The vote concerns the government's plan to remove the business rates relief that independent schools have historically enjoyed, alongside the broader policy of applying VAT to private school fees. Taken together, these changes represent a significant increase in the tax burden on independent schools. Had the amendment passed, schools would have had more time to adjust financially, potentially limiting fee increases or other changes. By defeating the amendment, the government cleared the path for the full impact of both measures to take effect without a phased introduction. The policy is expected to affect hundreds of thousands of pupils currently in the independent school sector, as well as the schools themselves, their staff, and the state sector, which the government argues will benefit from the additional tax revenue. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, providing the government with a comfortable majority. Conservatives and Liberal Democrats voted together in favour of transitional relief, forming the bulk of the 172 Ayes, alongside most Reform UK MPs and a majority of Independent MPs. The Greens and the SDLP joined the government in opposing the amendment. The Bill continued to face resistance at subsequent stages, including in the House of Lords, where a series of amendments were passed in early 2025 before the government moved to disagree with them in further Commons votes in March 2025.
Voting Aye meant
Support exempting private schools serving SEND children without EHC plans from the higher business rates, arguing these pupils would otherwise lose specialist provision
Voting No meant
Oppose the exemption, backing the government's position that the higher multiplier should apply to all private schools without carve-outs
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
300
61
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
98
0
18
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
34
8
Independent
—
6
3
5
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports permanent business rates reduction for retail/hospitality/leisure but demands impact assessments and broader reform including manufacturing; opposes VAT on private schools.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,142 words) →
Warns of unintended consequences: small businesses could be 80% worse off while big chains like Starbucks gain 40% under the scheme; calls for differential impact assessment.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (649 words) →
Supports Bill as common-sense rebalancing favouring local independents over online giants; cites expert evidence that Bill benefits 98% of retail stores and has marginal impact on private schools.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (798 words) →
Opposes removal of private school charitable relief and business rate rises; cites closure of Carrdus school (120 pupils); seeks amendment to delay implementation and protect SEND schools.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (993 words) →
Criticises Bill as smoke-and-mirrors: cuts to relief offset by higher multipliers; raises will hit major employers (supermarkets, hotels, NHS); revaluation will compound increases; seeks review via New Clause 2.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,052 words) →
Defends Bill as essential to support high streets and fund state education; rejects amendments as diluting support; private schools are businesses and should pay rates like any other.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,083 words) →
Argues Bill harms SMEs, data centres, breweries, zoos, and stadiums; contradicts Labour's pre-election promise to abolish business rates; removal of private school relief harms state schools via lost facility-sharing.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,532 words) →
Backs Bill as fair and necessary; private schools are businesses and should contribute; focuses on high street support and equity in education funding for state sector.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,028 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0