Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill: Second Reading
336Ayes
175Noes
Carried · majority 161 · Government won138 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 336 · No 175 · DNV 138 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 25 November 2024 to give the Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill its Second Reading, passing it by 336 votes to 175. Second Reading is the first substantive vote on a bill, allowing it to proceed through Parliament. The bill has two main elements: it removes the charitable business rates relief that private schools in England hold under charitable status, from April 2025, and it creates powers to introduce permanently lower business rates multipliers for retail, hospitality and leisure properties from April 2026, funded by higher multipliers on properties with rateable values of £500,000 or more. The vote matters because it advances two significant policy changes at once. Removing charitable rates relief from private schools in England, while retaining an exemption for schools serving mainly pupils with Education, Health and Care Plans, is expected to raise revenue that the government says will help fund a £2.3 billion increase to the core schools budget for 2025-26. For high street businesses, the bill promises a permanent lower rates regime to replace the temporary retail, hospitality and leisure relief that has operated year to year. Without the bill, that temporary relief was set to fall to zero from April 2025 before the government extended it at 40 percent for another year while the permanent reforms are put in place. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 291 voting Labour MPs and 34 Labour and Co-operative MPs backed the bill, along with four Greens and four Independents. Every Conservative and Liberal Democrat who voted opposed it, joined by Reform UK, the DUP, Traditional Unionist Voice, and six Independents. There were no Labour rebels recorded. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats together account for the bulk of the 175 noes. The bill sits within a wider legislative moment following the October 2024 Budget, and its provisions on private schools connect to a parallel debate over VAT on private school fees in the Finance Bill.
Voting Aye meant
Support removing charitable business rates relief from private schools and introducing a permanent lower rates regime for high street businesses, in line with Labour's manifesto commitments.
Voting No meant
Oppose removing tax relief from private schools and question the bill's impact on businesses already facing higher employer national insurance contributions and other rising costs.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
291
0
70
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
97
19
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
63
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
34
0
8
Independent
—
4
6
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
2
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Bill delivers permanent tax cuts for high streets, extends temporary relief to 40%, and funds £2.3bn schools investment by removing private school tax breaks; includes safeguards for SEND provision.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,910 words) →
Bill is a stealth tax on business breaking manifesto promises; cuts relief from 75% to 40%, imposes £925m rise in rates, and the private school measures will drive 90,000 pupils into already under-capacity state schools.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,846 words) →
Bill is inadequate tinkering rather than fundamental business rates reform; removes temporary relief cliff-edge but creates new problems; taxing education in principle is wrong; lacks impact assessment and may inadvertently subsidise big chains.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,754 words) →
Bill essential to fund state education after decade of austerity; removes unfair tax breaks allowing wealthy families advantage; supports high-needs SEND funding uplift of £1bn.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,781 words) →
Business rates particularly problematic due to fixed-cost nature; Bill fails to distinguish online from traditional retail; total revenue raised will increase not stay same; will cause displacement into state schools creating local strain.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,987 words) →
Supports permanent high-street rate cuts and ending private school tax breaks; but urges safeguards for smaller faith and independent schools charging £3k fees that serve deprived communities.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,545 words) →
As former teacher, supports removing private school tax exemptions; state schools lack basic supplies while private schools enjoy advantages; £1.5bn will transform state education.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (810 words) →
Cumulative impact of NI rises, Employment Rights Bill, and business rates cuts will devastate small businesses; demands Government publish impact assessments and statistics on pupils moving to state sector.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (327 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0