A divisionDivision No. 369 · Tuesday, 25 November 2025· Commons· Devolution

English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill: Third Reading

322Ayes
179Noes
Carried · majority 143 · Government won
146 did not vote
Aye322No181DID NOT VOTE · 146

647 Members · Aye 322 · No 179 · DNV 146 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 25 November 2025 to pass the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill at Third Reading, its final stage in the House of Commons. The bill passed by 322 votes to 179. Third Reading is the last opportunity for MPs to accept or reject a bill as a whole before it moves to the House of Lords. The bill represents a significant restructuring of devolved governance in England. It creates a new framework of "strategic authorities" at three tiers and gives mayors new powers over planning, transport, housing and regeneration. It restores the supplementary vote system for mayoral and Police and Crime Commissioner elections, which had been replaced by First Past the Post. It introduces a community right to buy assets of community value, including sports stadiums, and establishes a new Local Audit Office. It also mandates cabinet-style governance for English local councils and bans upwards-only rent review clauses in commercial leases. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, providing the bulk of the 322 ayes. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and most smaller parties voted against. Five independents voted aye and two voted no. The bill passed earlier report stage divisions on the same day by similar margins, with opposition amendments including New Clause 17 and New Clause 69 defeated by roughly 320 votes to fewer than 200. A recurring tension in debate was whether the bill's grant of ministerial powers to impose reorganisation without local consent sat in tension with its stated devolutionary purpose.

Voting Aye meant
Support the biggest devolution of power from central government to English regions in a generation, giving mayors and strategic authorities new powers over planning, transport, housing and regeneration, while reforming local council governance.
Voting No meant
Oppose this bill in its current form, raising concerns that ministers retain sweeping centralising powers — including the ability to impose reorganisation without local consent — while accountability and scrutiny mechanisms for mayors remain insufficient.
§ 01Who voted how.501 voting Members · 146 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
286
0
75
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
96
20
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
67
4
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
8
0
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
1
4
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
2
2
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Miatta FahnbullehSupportivePeckham
Government has listened to concerns and is delivering new devolution powers including visitor levy, protecting councillor safety by not publishing home addresses, and setting national taxi licensing standards while strengthening local audit oversight.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,181 words)
Zöe FranklinOpposedGuildford
The Bill centralises power upward to combined authorities and statutory mayors at the expense of local voices, parish councils and genuine community empowerment; councils lack funding to implement new duties.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (1,417 words)
Caroline VoadenQuestioningSouth Devon
Questioning whether the overnight visitor levy will apply to council areas without a mayor and whether foundational strategic authorities will have this power.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (859 words)
Martin WrigleyNeutralNewton Abbot
Welcomes general power of competence for national park authorities but concerned that new unitary authorities should not dominate park authority board membership with a majority.Unknown · Voted no · Read full speech (215 words)
Sarah OlneyOpposedRichmond Park
Two local authorities in her constituency operate effective committee systems; questions why Government proposes additional hurdles for councils to continue operating this proven governance model.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (103 words)
David SimmondsNeutralRuislip, Northwood and Pinner
Raises point of order about Government pre-announcement of visitor levy via press release before statement to Parliament, contrasting with earlier ministerial claims of not pre-empting Chancellor.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,922 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0