English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: Amendment 25
99Ayes
367Noes
Defeated · majority 268 · Government won182 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 99 · No 367 · DNV 182 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on Amendment 25 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which the full House examines and proposes changes to a bill after it has been scrutinised in committee) on 24 November 2025. The amendment, tabled by the opposition, sought to modify the government's devolution proposals for England. It was defeated by 367 votes to 99. The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill is the government's flagship legislation to transfer powers from Whitehall to regional mayors and combined authorities across England. The bill grants elected mayors new powers over planning, transport, skills and economic development, and introduces measures intended to strengthen community rights, including over assets of community value. The defeated amendment reflected Conservative opposition concern that the bill concentrates rather than disperses power, and that local authorities and communities are being subject to compulsory reorganisation without adequate accountability. The vote preserves the government's original framework, including provisions for mandatory local government reorganisation and expanded mayoral planning powers. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 276 Labour MPs and all 29 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the government by voting No, as did all 57 Liberal Democrats. The 90 Conservative MPs who voted all backed the amendment, joining 6 Reform UK members and 3 Democratic Unionist Party members in the Aye lobby. Two independents voted Aye and four voted No. The Conservatives framed the bill as centralising rather than devolving, with shadow minister Paul Holmes describing it as giving local areas "the powers that the government wants them to have" rather than genuine devolution. The bill sits within a broader government programme that also includes planning reforms and fair funding changes, all of which critics argue are being rushed through while existing local authority structures are simultaneously being reorganised.
Voting Aye meant
Support restricting mayoral development corporations from designating rural land for development, favouring building in town centres and high-density urban areas first
Voting No meant
Oppose the restriction, backing the government's broader approach to housing development which allows mayors more flexibility over where development can be designated
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
276
85
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
90
0
26
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
57
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
—
2
4
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
—
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Your Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moves New Clause 43 on charges for undertakers executing works in maintainable highways, introducing mayoral authority over highway charging.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,191 words) →
Leads discussion of multiple new clauses covering council tax limits, CIL exemptions, mayoral convening duties, and skills devolution—raising concerns about governance checks and local accountability.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (14,874 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0