English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: New Clause 80
187Ayes
320Noes
Defeated · majority 133 · Government won141 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 187 · No 320 · DNV 141 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 25 November 2025 on New Clause 80 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, a Conservative amendment that would have required the consent of all constituent councils before the Secretary of State could create, change, or dissolve a strategic authority. The amendment was defeated by 320 votes to 187. The vote concerned one of the Bill's most contested powers: the ability of ministers to impose new strategic authorities on local areas even without unanimous local agreement. Rejecting New Clause 80 means the government retains that power. In practical terms, local councils across England cannot veto a ministerial decision to restructure their area, merge authorities, or create a new mayoral combined authority above them. The populations of those councils are directly affected, since the structural changes determine which tier of government oversees planning, transport, economic development, and related services. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted uniformly against the amendment, providing the 316 votes needed to defeat it comfortably. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Green Party, and several independents all voted in favour, making it a rare cross-opposition alliance. The same day saw a closely related division, New Clause 69, defeated by an almost identical margin of 320 to 189, suggesting the opposition tested the consent principle more than once and failed on each occasion. The Bill passed its Third Reading the same day by 322 votes to 179, confirming broad government control of the legislation throughout.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring local council consent before the government can restructure local government boundaries or create new strategic authorities, protecting local democratic accountability.
Voting No meant
Oppose the consent requirement, backing the government's power to direct local government reorganisation without unanimous local agreement in order to advance devolution.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
286
75
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
98
0
18
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
68
0
3
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
30
12
Independent
—
4
3
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
8
0
0
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government has listened to concerns and is delivering new devolution powers including visitor levy, protecting councillor safety by not publishing home addresses, and setting national taxi licensing standards while strengthening local audit oversight.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,181 words) →
The Bill centralises power upward to combined authorities and statutory mayors at the expense of local voices, parish councils and genuine community empowerment; councils lack funding to implement new duties.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,417 words) →
Questioning whether the overnight visitor levy will apply to council areas without a mayor and whether foundational strategic authorities will have this power.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (859 words) →
Welcomes general power of competence for national park authorities but concerned that new unitary authorities should not dominate park authority board membership with a majority.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (215 words) →
Two local authorities in her constituency operate effective committee systems; questions why Government proposes additional hurdles for councils to continue operating this proven governance model.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words) →
Raises point of order about Government pre-announcement of visitor levy via press release before statement to Parliament, contrasting with earlier ministerial claims of not pre-empting Chancellor.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,922 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0