English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
158Ayes
318Noes
Defeated · majority 160 · Government won170 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 158 · No 318 · DNV 170 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted on 24 November 2025 on New Clause 2 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, a Conservative amendment that would have required mayoral combined authorities and combined county authorities to follow the same council tax referendum rules as the majority of county and unitary councils. Under those rules, raising a mayoral precept above a set threshold would require a public referendum. The amendment was defeated by 318 votes to 158. The vote matters because it determines whether mayors in England face a formal, statutory cap on their power to raise the council tax precept they charge residents, or whether they remain free to set that precept subject only to the scrutiny of elections. If passed, the amendment would have tied mayoral precept increases to the same referendum principles that constrain most county and unitary councils, meaning voters could trigger a vote if rises exceeded a government-set threshold. Its defeat leaves mayors without that additional constraint, preserving their discretion over precept levels within the broader devolution framework the Bill creates. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 278 Labour MPs and 29 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government and opposed the amendment. All 91 Conservative MPs who voted, all 58 Liberal Democrats, all 6 Reform UK MPs, and all 3 Democratic Unionist Party members who voted supported the amendment. The Greens voted with the government. The vote sits within a wider series of divisions on the same Bill across 24 and 25 November 2025, in which opposition amendments were consistently defeated by similar margins.
Voting Aye meant
Support capping mayoral council tax precept increases under the same referendum principles that apply to most county and unitary councils, on the grounds that equal powers require equal taxpayer protections.
Voting No meant
Oppose imposing referendum thresholds on mayoral precepts, arguing that elected mayors are already democratically accountable to residents and that such constraints would undermine devolution.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
278
83
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
91
0
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
58
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
—
2
7
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moves New Clause 43 on charges for undertakers executing works in maintainable highways, introducing mayoral authority over highway charging.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,191 words) →
Leads discussion of multiple new clauses covering council tax limits, CIL exemptions, mayoral convening duties, and skills devolution—raising concerns about governance checks and local accountability.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (14,874 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0