English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: New Clause 17
87Ayes
321Noes
Defeated · majority 234 · Government won241 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 87 · No 321 · DNV 241 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 25 November 2025 on New Clause 17, a Liberal Democrat amendment to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill at Report Stage. The clause would have placed a statutory requirement on the government to guarantee funding to strategic authorities and mayors whenever new responsibilities were placed on them. The amendment was defeated by 321 votes to 87. The practical effect of the clause, had it passed, would have been to enshrine in law a financial protection for combined authorities, combined county authorities, and mayoral bodies against unfunded mandates: new duties from central government would automatically have carried a funding guarantee. The government argued that an existing administrative process, the new burdens assessment, already ensures that new responsibilities come with appropriate resources, making a statutory clause unnecessary. Opponents of the clause accepted this process as sufficient; supporters argued it lacked the legal force of a statutory commitment. The Liberal Democrats provided the core of the 87 ayes, with 68 of their MPs voting for the clause. Reform UK (5), the Democratic Unionist Party (4), the Green Party (3), and three Independents also voted for it. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted almost unanimously against, providing the bulk of the 321 noes. Only 1 Labour MP voted for the clause. The Conservatives had 115 MPs with no vote recorded, contributing just 1 aye. The vote reflects the broader Liberal Democrat position on the bill, which their spokesperson Zoe Franklin argued concentrates power upward rather than genuinely empowering local communities.
Voting Aye meant
Support a statutory guarantee that central government must fund strategic authorities and mayors for any new duties placed on them, preventing unfunded mandates on local bodies.
Voting No meant
Oppose the new clause on the grounds that the existing new burdens assessment process already ensures new responsibilities come with appropriate funding, making a statutory requirement redundant.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
287
73
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
1
0
115
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
68
0
3
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
—
3
3
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
1
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government has listened to concerns and is delivering new devolution powers including visitor levy, protecting councillor safety by not publishing home addresses, and setting national taxi licensing standards while strengthening local audit oversight.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,181 words) →
The Bill centralises power upward to combined authorities and statutory mayors at the expense of local voices, parish councils and genuine community empowerment; councils lack funding to implement new duties.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,417 words) →
Questioning whether the overnight visitor levy will apply to council areas without a mayor and whether foundational strategic authorities will have this power.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (859 words) →
Welcomes general power of competence for national park authorities but concerned that new unitary authorities should not dominate park authority board membership with a majority.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (215 words) →
Two local authorities in her constituency operate effective committee systems; questions why Government proposes additional hurdles for councils to continue operating this proven governance model.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words) →
Raises point of order about Government pre-announcement of visitor levy via press release before statement to Parliament, contrasting with earlier ministerial claims of not pre-empting Chancellor.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,922 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0