English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: New Clause 17

Tuesday, 25 November 2025 · Division No. 366 · Commons

87Ayes
321Noes
Defeated

241 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedAnti Council Tax Increase(Yes)Pro Local Democracy(Yes)Pro Devolution To Mayors(No)Pro Regional Autonomy(No)

Voting Yes means

Support imposing the same council tax referendum limits on mayoral combined authorities as apply to county and unitary councils, preventing mayors from raising council tax more than other local bodies

Voting No means

Oppose this restriction, backing the government's devolution framework which allows combined authorities greater fiscal flexibility as part of a planned transfer of powers to regional mayors

Parliament voted on 25 November 2025 on New Clause 17 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which the full House of Commons debates and votes on proposed changes to a bill). The new clause, which would have added enhanced community empowerment provisions beyond what the government had included in its own legislation, was heavily defeated. The vote was 87 in favour and 321 against.

The defeat means that the additional community empowerment measures proposed in New Clause 17 will not be incorporated into the Bill. The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill covers a wide range of local governance matters, including the structure of combined authorities, community rights to bid for assets, local audit arrangements, taxi and private hire vehicle licensing standards, and the governance models available to councils. Critics of the government's approach, particularly the Liberal Democrats, argued during the debate that the Bill as written concentrates power upwards toward combined authorities and elected mayors rather than genuinely distributing it to parishes, town councils and local communities. The vote on New Clause 17 represents one of several unsuccessful attempts by opposition parties to push the Bill's community empowerment provisions further than the government was willing to go.

The division showed a clear party-line split. Labour MPs voted overwhelmingly against the new clause, with 287 Labour members and 29 Labour and Co-operative members in the No lobby. The Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of support, with 68 of their MPs voting in favour. Smaller parties and independents broadly supported the new clause: Reform UK contributed 5 Aye votes, the Democratic Unionist Party 4, the Greens 3, and a handful of independents also voted Aye. Only a single Labour MP broke ranks to vote in favour. The same day saw two further related defeats for the opposition, with New Clause 69 lost 189 to 320 and New Clause 80 lost 187 to 320, while the Bill itself passed its Third Reading later that evening by 322 votes to 179, confirming the government's firm control of the legislation's final shape.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
1 Aye/287 No

1 rebel: Apsana Begum

Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
68 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/29 No
Independent
3 Aye/3 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyFree vote
4 Aye/1 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

1 MP voted against their party whip

What They Said in the Debate

Zöe Franklin

Liberal Democrat · Guildford

Opposed

The Bill centralises power upward to combined authorities and statutory mayors at the expense of local voices, parish councils and genuine community empowerment; councils lack funding to implement new duties.

Voted Aye

Sarah Olney

Liberal Democrat · Richmond Park

Opposed

Two local authorities in her constituency operate effective committee systems; questions why Government proposes additional hurdles for councils to continue operating this proven governance model.

Voted Aye

Caroline Voaden

Liberal Democrat · South Devon

Questioning

Questioning whether the overnight visitor levy will apply to council areas without a mayor and whether foundational strategic authorities will have this power.

Voted Aye

Martin Wrigley

Unknown · Newton Abbot

Neutral

Welcomes general power of competence for national park authorities but concerned that new unitary authorities should not dominate park authority board membership with a majority.

Voted Aye

David Simmonds

Conservative · Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner

Neutral

Raises point of order about Government pre-announcement of visitor levy via press release before statement to Parliament, contrasting with earlier ministerial claims of not pre-empting Chancellor.

Miatta Fahnbulleh

Labour · Peckham

Supportive

Government has listened to concerns and is delivering new devolution powers including visitor levy, protecting councillor safety by not publishing home addresses, and setting national taxi licensing standards while strengthening local audit oversight.

Voted No

Related Votes