English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: Amendment 85
57Ayes
309Noes
Defeated · majority 252 · Government won281 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 57 · No 309 · DNV 281 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 24 November 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 85 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill after it has been examined in detail by a committee). The amendment was defeated by 309 votes to 57, a margin of 252 votes. The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill aims to transfer significant powers from central government to regional mayors and combined authorities across England, covering areas such as planning, transport, housing, skills and economic development. Amendment 85 sought to change aspects of how those devolved powers would be implemented. Its defeat means the government's preferred approach to English devolution remains intact, with no modification from this amendment. The bill affects local councils, mayors, businesses and communities across England, particularly those areas subject to local government reorganisation and new mayoral structures. The amendment was supported almost entirely by the Liberal Democrats, who provided 58 of the 57 recorded Ayes (with one Independent also voting in favour). Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against, providing 303 of the 309 Noes. The Conservatives, despite being the official opposition, were entirely absent from this division, recording 116 abstentions. This reflects a broader pattern across the Report Stage, in which the Liberal Democrats positioned themselves as the primary parliamentary challengers to specific provisions of the bill, while the Conservatives largely stood aside. The bill continued to face criticism from Conservative members in debate, who argued it represented centralisation rather than genuine devolution.
Voting Aye meant
Support removing or limiting the role of commissioners for mayors, arguing it reduces democratic accountability and concentrates power away from elected representatives and local communities
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the government's plan to allow commissioners to support mayors of combined authorities as a useful governance tool
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
274
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
58
0
14
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
—
1
3
9
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
—
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Your Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moves New Clause 43 on charges for undertakers executing works in maintainable highways, introducing mayoral authority over highway charging.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,191 words) →
Leads discussion of multiple new clauses covering council tax limits, CIL exemptions, mayoral convening duties, and skills devolution—raising concerns about governance checks and local accountability.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (14,874 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0