A divisionDivision No. 364 · Monday, 24 November 2025· Commons· Devolution

English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill Report Stage: Amendment 85

57Ayes
309Noes
Defeated · majority 252 · Government won
281 did not vote
Aye59No309DID NOT VOTE · 281

647 Members · Aye 57 · No 309 · DNV 281 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament defeated Amendment 85 to the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill on 24 November 2025, by 309 votes to 57. The amendment, tabled by the Liberal Democrats, sought to place tighter constraints on the power of mayors within combined authorities to appoint commissioners, in the name of democratic accountability and preventing an over-concentration of power in mayoral offices. The vote matters because the Bill restructures devolution across England, establishing a new framework of strategic authorities at three levels and giving mayors significant new tools and responsibilities. How those mayors govern, and how much scrutiny they face, is central to whether devolution genuinely disperses power or simply relocates it. The amendment would have imposed restrictions on mayoral commissioner appointments, a mechanism by which mayors can bring in external figures to take on specific responsibilities within their authority. The division followed strict party lines. All 57 Ayes came from the Liberal Democrats, with one independent also voting in favour. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against, providing all 309 Noes. The Conservatives, who hold 116 seats, had no vote recorded. The result reflects the Liberal Democrats' position throughout the Bill's passage that the legislation as drafted concentrates too much power upward rather than outward to communities.

Voting Aye meant
Support tighter constraints on mayoral commissioner appointments to ensure democratic accountability and prevent over-centralisation of power in mayoral offices
Voting No meant
Oppose restricting mayoral powers to appoint commissioners, backing the government's approach of giving mayors the tools and flexibility needed to govern effectively
§ 01Who voted how.366 voting Members · 281 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
274
87
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
58
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
29
13
Independent
1
3
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Miatta FahnbullehSupportivePeckham
Moves New Clause 43 on charges for undertakers executing works in maintainable highways, introducing mayoral authority over highway charging.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,191 words)
Ms Nusrat GhaniQuestioningSussex Weald
Leads discussion of multiple new clauses covering council tax limits, CIL exemptions, mayoral convening duties, and skills devolution—raising concerns about governance checks and local accountability.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (14,874 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0