Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: Third Reading
320Ayes
171Noes
Carried · majority 149 · Government won159 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 320 · No 171 · DNV 159 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 20 October 2025 to pass the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill at Third Reading (the final Commons stage before the bill moves to the Lords), by 320 votes to 171. The bill transfers sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia, from the United Kingdom to Mauritius, while allowing the UK to continue operating its military base on Diego Garcia under a lease arrangement agreed in a treaty signed on 22 May 2025. The bill ends the British Indian Ocean Territory as a British overseas territory in domestic law, removes it from the list of such territories in the British Nationality Act 1981, and preserves existing laws of the territory to ensure continuity. In practical terms, the UK gives up sovereign control over the archipelago in exchange for continued operational rights over the Diego Garcia base, which hosts significant US and UK military assets. The bill also closes future entitlement to British Overseas Territories citizenship based on Chagos connections, while preserving existing transitional routes to British citizenship for eligible Chagossians until current statutory deadlines. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 303 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the bill; Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted against. Four independents and all four Plaid Cymru MPs voted with the government, as did all three Green MPs who voted. There were no Conservative or Liberal Democrat votes in favour. The Conservatives framed the bill throughout proceedings as a "surrender" of British territory for a cost to the taxpayer of £35 billion, and raised concerns about Mauritius's relationships with China and Russia.
Voting Aye meant
Support transferring sovereignty of the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius, accepting that the UK retains operational rights over the Diego Garcia military base under a lease arrangement and that the deal is in Britain's long-term strategic and legal interest.
Voting No meant
Oppose the transfer of sovereignty, arguing it surrenders British territory, undermines national security by drawing Mauritius closer to China and Russia, fails the Chagossian community, and was agreed without adequate parliamentary scrutiny.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
272
0
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
95
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
62
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
31
0
11
Independent
—
4
4
5
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
7
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0