Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: Amendment 7
174Ayes
321Noes
Defeated · majority 147 · Government won154 did not vote
649 Members · Aye 174 · No 321 · DNV 154 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 20 October 2025 on Amendment 7 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill, during the bill's committee stage. The amendment, tabled by Conservative MPs, would have required the Secretary of State to lay before Parliament a memorandum explaining the legal basis under international law for transferring sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius before the treaty and the bill's key provisions could come into force. That memorandum would have had to include a summary of legal advice received, an analysis of the UK's sovereignty status under international law, the legal argument for ceding sovereignty, and an assessment of the risks had no deal been struck. The amendment was defeated by 321 votes to 174. The bill implements a treaty signed on 22 May 2025 under which Mauritius becomes sovereign over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia. It dissolves the British Indian Ocean Territory in domestic law and removes it from the list of British overseas territories in the British Nationality Act 1981. The UK retains rights to administer and operate the Diego Garcia military base under terms granted by Mauritius. Amendment 7 would have inserted a delay mechanism: neither the treaty nor the operative clauses of the bill could take effect until the legal memorandum had been laid before Parliament, with a two-month deadline from Royal Assent. Its defeat means the bill can proceed without that condition being met. All 272 Labour and 33 Labour and Co-operative Party members who voted opposed the amendment. The Conservatives were unanimously in favour, joined by all 64 Liberal Democrats who voted, all 7 Reform UK members, all 4 Democratic Unionist Party members, and 3 independents. Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, and the Your Party grouping all voted against. The vote was one of several on the same day: a related division on New Clause 1 fell 322 to 172, and the bill passed its Third Reading 320 to 171, confirming that the government's majority held consistently throughout.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to publish its legal reasoning — including a summary of legal advice — justifying the handover of the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius before the treaty takes effect.
Voting No meant
Oppose the delay mechanism, backing the government's position that the treaty should proceed without a mandatory legal memorandum being laid before Parliament first.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
272
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
33
9
Independent
—
4
5
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0