A divisionDivision No. 316 · Monday, 20 October 2025· Commons· Defence and Foreign Affairs

Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: Clause 2 stand part

318Ayes
174Noes
Carried · majority 144 · Government won
157 did not vote
Aye316No176DID NOT VOTE · 157

649 Members · Aye 318 · No 174 · DNV 157 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 20 October 2025 to keep Clause 2 of the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill in the legislation, by 318 votes to 174. Clause 2 is the central provision dissolving the British Indian Ocean Territory as a British overseas territory in domestic law, and its removal would have gutted the Bill. The government won comfortably. The vote advances the UK-Mauritius Treaty signed on 22 May 2025, under which Mauritius becomes sovereign over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia. Keeping Clause 2 in the Bill means the dissolution of BIOT proceeds once the Treaty enters into force, removing BIOT from the list of British overseas territories in the British Nationality Act 1981 and ending UK sovereignty over the islands. The Diego Garcia military base would continue to operate under rights granted by Mauritius rather than British sovereignty. The division broke sharply along party lines. All 272 voting Labour MPs and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs backed the clause, along with Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most other smaller parties. All 93 voting Conservatives, all 64 Liberal Democrats, and all 7 Reform UK MPs voted against, as did the Democratic Unionist Party. Opponents, led by the Conservatives, framed the Bill as a "surrender" of British territory for £35 billion, raising concerns about Chinese and Russian influence over Mauritius and the security of the Diego Garcia base. The Bill had already cleared related divisions on the same day, with amendments requiring publication of legal advice and risk assessments all defeated.

Voting Aye meant
Support keeping Clause 2 in the Bill, backing the transfer of sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius and implementing the UK-Mauritius Treaty, trusting that the deal secures the Diego Garcia military base at lower cost than alternatives.
Voting No meant
Oppose Clause 2 and the transfer of British sovereignty to Mauritius, arguing the deal surrenders national territory for £35 billion, exposes the base to Chinese and Russian influence, and betrays British Chagossians.
§ 01Who voted how.492 voting Members · 157 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
272
0
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
93
23
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
63
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
33
0
9
Independent
2
6
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
7
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
1
1
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (5,114 words)
Stephen DoughtySupportiveCardiff South and Penarth
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,910 words)
Dr Al PinkertonOpposedSurrey Heath
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,728 words)
Mr Calvin BaileySupportiveLeyton and Wanstead
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (937 words)
Stuart AndersonOpposedSouth Shropshire
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (740 words)
Sir Edward LeighOpposedGainsborough
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,140 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0