Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: Reasoned Amendment
116Ayes
333Noes
Defeated · majority 217 · Government won198 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 116 · No 333 · DNV 198 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted on 9 September 2025 on a Conservative reasoned amendment to block the Second Reading of the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill. A reasoned amendment is a procedural device that, if passed, would have prevented the Bill from advancing by formally stating the House's reasons for rejecting it at this stage. The amendment was defeated by 333 votes to 116. The Bill implements the treaty signed on 22 May 2025 between the UK and Mauritius, under which Mauritius becomes sovereign over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia. In practical terms, the legislation dissolves the British Indian Ocean Territory as a British overseas territory in domestic law, removes it from the British Nationality Act 1981, and grants the UK the right to administer and operate the Diego Garcia military base under Mauritius's authority for 99 years. The vote to defeat the amendment allowed the Bill to proceed to its later stages. The base at Diego Garcia has for decades served as a joint UK-US military facility supporting operations across the Middle East, east Africa and south Asia. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 100 Conservative MPs who voted backed the amendment, joined by all 8 Reform UK MPs, all 5 Democratic Unionist Party MPs, and a handful of independents, giving the Ayes their total of 116. Every Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Green, SDLP, and Your Party MP who voted opposed the amendment, producing the Noes total of 333. No Labour or Labour Co-operative MP voted Aye, and no Conservative MP voted No. The Conservatives' central argument was that the government had capitulated in negotiations and agreed to a financial settlement far beyond what the previous government would have accepted, while the government's response was that the deal as published secures the base's operation and improves on what the Conservatives had been negotiating. With the amendment defeated, the Bill proceeded through its subsequent stages, including a committee sitting on 20 October 2025 where further amendments were considered.
Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the Bill, arguing the government surrendered too much — including excessive financial compensation to Mauritius — in a deal that falls short of what the previous Conservative government would have accepted.
Voting No meant
Support passing the Bill, arguing the treaty secures 99 years of guaranteed UK-US military operations at Diego Garcia, protects British strategic interests, and improves on the negotiating position inherited from the Conservatives.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
284
77
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
100
0
16
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
—
2
7
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
8
0
0
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
2
0
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Defends the treaty as securing critical defence interests against legal threats; claims the previous Conservative government started negotiations for the same reason; attacks Opposition for not publishing their own negotiating position.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,936 words) →
Opposes the bill as an unjustified surrender of sovereignty, arguing the UK paid for freehold ownership in the 1960s and is now renting back at £35 billion cost; rejects legal threat narrative and argues previous Foreign Secretary Cameron ended negotiations, not left a deal.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,932 words) →
Questions whether the deal retains rolling sovereignty after 99 years and challenges the government's claimed compensation to Mauritius, asserting Labour has capitulated compared to Conservative negotiating position.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (208 words) →
Argues the ICJ judgment was not legally binding on the UK and criticises use of Net Present Value methodology to justify the cost, which conflates commercial accounting with sovereign treaty obligations.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,780 words) →
Demands a full apology (not just regret) for Chagossian treatment; notes legal judgment supports return to Mauritius; seeks clarity on resettlement rights and Diego Garcia access for displaced islanders.Independent · Voted no · Read full speech (1,877 words) →
Questions whether the 99-year lease with only first refusal truly secures the base long-term; warns Britain becomes hostage to future Mauritian decisions and risks losing the base in four generations.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,644 words) →
Challenges the government's costings and accounting methodology, citing disagreement with the Government Actuary's Department and Office for Budget Responsibility; questions why NPV has not been used in comparable government decisions.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (406 words) →
Supports the deal; notes US Defence Secretary and President Trump endorsement; questions why Conservatives who negotiated 85% of the treaty now oppose it from opposition benches.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,131 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0