Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: New Clause 1
172Ayes
322Noes
Defeated · majority 150 · Government won154 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 172 · No 322 · DNV 154 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 20 October 2025 on New Clause 1 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill, a Conservative proposal that would have required the House of Commons to approve any payment to Mauritius before public money could be spent under the UK-Mauritius treaty. The clause was defeated by 322 votes to 172. The bill implements the treaty under which the UK cedes sovereignty over the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius, while retaining rights to operate the Diego Garcia military base. New Clause 1 targeted the financial dimension of that arrangement. Supporters argued that Parliament should authorise spending before it is committed, pointing to a Government Actuary's Department estimate putting the total cost of payments to Mauritius at around £34.7 billion. Opponents of the clause, led by the government, held that existing parliamentary scrutiny mechanisms were adequate and that imposing a fresh approval condition would obstruct implementation of a concluded international agreement. The vote divided almost entirely along opposition-versus-government lines. All 273 Labour and 33 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the clause, giving the government a comfortable majority. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted in favour. The Liberal Democrats supplied 64 of the 172 ayes, making them a significant part of the cross-party opposition bloc. The Greens and Plaid Cymru voted no. The vote was one of several on the same day, with the bill passing its Third Reading by 320 to 171, indicating that the government's majority held firm throughout the committee stage.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring a parliamentary vote before any payments are made to Mauritius under the Chagos treaty, arguing this upholds Parliament's control over public money and forces transparency on the deal's real financial cost.
Voting No meant
Oppose this condition as an obstacle to implementing the treaty, arguing parliamentary scrutiny through existing mechanisms is sufficient and that blocking payments would undermine a concluded international agreement.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
273
88
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
33
9
Independent
—
3
6
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0