Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: New Clause 1
172Ayes
322Noes
Defeated · majority 150 · Government won154 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 172 · No 322 · DNV 154 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on New Clause 1 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill during its committee stage on 20 October 2025. The clause, which sought to add conditions or oversight mechanisms to the arrangements governing the Diego Garcia military base, was defeated by 322 votes to 172. The defeat of New Clause 1 means the Diego Garcia Bill will proceed without the additional conditions or parliamentary oversight provisions that the opposition sought to attach. The bill governs the legal framework for the UK's military base arrangements on Diego Garcia, a strategically significant installation in the Indian Ocean used jointly with the United States. By voting down the clause, the government preserved its preferred approach, maintaining executive flexibility over how the base is operated and how any treaty arrangements are implemented, rather than subjecting those arrangements to additional statutory conditions. The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative Party members voting did so against the clause, while Conservatives (94), Liberal Democrats (64), Reform UK (7), the Democratic Unionist Party (4) and Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted in favour. Notably, the Greens and Plaid Cymru voted with the government against the clause, departing from the broader opposition bloc. The result closely mirrors other divisions on the same bill the same day, suggesting a consistent whipping pattern throughout committee stage, with the government ultimately winning the bill's third reading by 320 votes to 171.
Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the treaty's entry into force until the government publishes its legal advice and analysis of international law obligations underpinning the decision to cede sovereignty to Mauritius
Voting No meant
Oppose delaying the treaty, backing the government's position that the Diego Garcia deal should proceed without the precondition of publishing detailed legal advice
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
273
88
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
33
9
Independent
—
2
7
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0