Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: Amendment 9
83Ayes
319Noes
Defeated · majority 236 · Government won248 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 83 · No 319 · DNV 248 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Division 315 on 20 October 2025 saw MPs defeat Amendment 9 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill by 319 votes to 83. The amendment, tabled by Dr Al Pinkerton, the Liberal Democrat MP for Surrey Heath, would have required the government to negotiate with Mauritius for a legally binding right for Chagossians to return and reside in the Chagos Islands, and to seek Chagossian agreement to a self-determination referendum, before the treaty transferring sovereignty could come into force. The amendment sought to make Chagossian rights a precondition for the treaty taking legal effect. The Bill implements a treaty signed on 22 May 2025 under which Mauritius becomes sovereign over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia, with the UK retaining rights to administer and operate its military base there. Supporters of the amendment argued the treaty fails to provide a legally binding right to return or a binding programme of resettlement for Chagossians, the people forcibly displaced from the islands decades ago. Opponents characterised it as a wrecking measure that would prevent the government from meeting its international commitments on a treaty that, they argued, also secures the Diego Garcia base. The vote divided almost entirely along lines of government versus opposition. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, providing the bulk of the 319 noes, while the Green Party also voted no. The Liberal Democrats provided the largest share of the 83 ayes, joined by smaller numbers from Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, the SNP, and four Conservatives. The Conservatives had 112 members with no vote recorded. The Bill passed its Third Reading the same day by 320 votes to 171.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to secure Chagossian rights to return and a self-determination referendum as a precondition for the treaty entering into force, on the grounds that transferring sovereignty to Mauritius without Chagossian consent perpetuates a historic injustice.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment as a wrecking measure that would delay or derail the Chagos treaty, undermining the UK's international commitments and the security of the Diego Garcia military base, and arguing the treaty's terms cannot practicably be renegotiated.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
271
90
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
112
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
62
0
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
33
9
Independent
—
2
5
6
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
6
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0