Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill Committee: Amendment 9
83Ayes
319Noes
Defeated · majority 236 · Government won248 did not vote
650 Members · Aye 83 · No 319 · DNV 248 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 20 October 2025, MPs voted on Amendment 9 to the Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill during its Committee stage. The amendment, which sought enhanced parliamentary oversight or modified terms for the military base arrangements, was defeated by 319 votes to 83. The Diego Garcia Bill concerns the legal framework governing the UK's military base on Diego Garcia, part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, and relates to the broader treaty negotiated with Mauritius over sovereignty of the Chagos Islands. Amendment 9 aimed to alter the terms under which the base would operate, likely by introducing greater scrutiny mechanisms or revised conditions. Its defeat means the government's preferred framework for the base arrangements proceeds without the additional constraints or oversight provisions the amendment would have introduced. The vote saw an unusual cross-party coalition of 83 MPs supporting the amendment, drawn mainly from the Liberal Democrats (63 votes), alongside smaller contributions from Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Scottish National Party, and a handful of Conservatives and Independents. Labour and the Co-operative Party MPs voted solidly against, providing the 319 No votes. Notably, the overwhelming majority of Conservative MPs were absent rather than voting against the amendment, a pattern that recurred across several divisions on this bill the same day. The result mirrors closely the pattern of other amendments to the same bill defeated on the same date.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the treaty to include legally binding rights of return and resettlement for Chagossians before it can come into force, prioritising indigenous rights
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, backing the treaty as negotiated and rejecting changes that the government argues would undermine the deal and UK international credibility
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
271
90
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
112
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
33
9
Independent
—
1
6
6
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
3
0
6
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Opposes the Bill as a £35 billion 'surrender' that compromises UK security, fails to protect Chagossian rights, and lacks legal justification; amendments seek transparency on costs, legal advice, and parliamentary control over payments and the marine protected area.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (5,114 words) →
Defends the treaty as protecting UK security interests and achieving what Conservative negotiations could not; challenges opposition claims as misinformation and argues the US and allies support the deal.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,910 words) →
Supports amendments requiring referendum on self-determination for Chagossians, robust reporting on marine protection and expenditure, and consultation with Chagossian communities to address historical injustices.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,728 words) →
Characterises opposition amendments as 'wrecking amendments' designed to undermine international commitments and credibility; opposes referendums on foreign policy as demonstrated failure.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (937 words) →
Argues ceding Diego Garcia is a 'monumental strategic error' given China's rising military capability, growing Chinese submarine presence in Indo-Pacific, and decline of UK armed forces; base is essential strategic foothold.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (740 words) →
Supports advisory referendum for UK-based Chagossians on the treaty; frames it as moderate and sensible proposal.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,140 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0