Finance Bill Committee: New Clause 6
Wednesday, 11 December 2024 · Division No. 67 · Commons
228 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support requiring an official impact assessment of how stamp duty changes affect private rents and housing supply, holding the government to account for potential unintended consequences in the rental sector
Voting No means
Oppose mandating a separate impact assessment, arguing the government has already considered these effects and that additional reporting requirements are unnecessary
What happened: Parliament voted on New Clause 6 to the Finance Bill on 11 December 2024, during the Committee stage of the legislation. The clause, tabled by the opposition, sought to modify the government's proposals on private school taxation. The amendment was defeated by 314 votes to 105.
Why it matters: The underlying policy in this part of the Finance Bill removes the VAT exemption that private schools have historically enjoyed on their education, vocational training and boarding fees. The government argues this will raise approximately 460 million pounds in additional revenue in 2024-25, funding increases to the state school budget including recruitment of additional teachers. Critics argue the change will push pupils, including those with special educational needs and disabilities, out of independent schools and into a state sector that lacks capacity to absorb them. Concerns were also raised in debate about the impact on small rural schools, faith schools, and the children of armed forces personnel covered by the continuity of education allowance.
The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 309 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government, while 96 Conservatives voted for the amendment alongside four Reform UK MPs, four independents, and one each from the Democratic Unionist Party and the Ulster Unionist Party. The Greens voted with the government. The opposition framed the amendment as protection for vulnerable pupils and communities; the government framed resistance to it as defending investment in state education. This division sits within a broader sequence of Finance Bill votes running through to March 2025, when the Bill passed its Third Reading by 339 votes to 172.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · North West Norfolk
Opposes VAT on private school fees as a cruel, ideological tax imposed mid-year that will damage education of 37,000 pupils and particularly harm SEND pupils without EHCPs, small rural schools, and faith schools; calls for new clause 8 to review impact.
Voted Aye
Liberal Democrat · Twickenham
Opposes the tax on principle; supports new clause 9 requiring impact assessment on SEND pupils without EHCPs, warning 100,000 such pupils will face fee rises and families may seek EHCPs to avoid VAT, straining the already-failed SEND system.
Conservative · East Hampshire
Opposes as bad policy that taxes education contrary to global norm; argues Government's 37,000 pupil displacement estimate is mathematically flawed, ignores capital costs, and will disproportionately displace SEND and faith school pupils.
Voted Aye
Conservative · Leicester East
Opposes as tax on aspiration that harms ordinary working families (nurses, tradespeople, small business owners) who sacrificed to afford independent schools; criticises lack of proper impact assessment and mid-year implementation.
Voted Aye
Conservative · Bexhill and Battle
Opposes as divisive framing that pits schoolchild against schoolchild; argues Government wrongly suggests not taxing private fees takes money from state schools, when UK spends £1trn+ annually and can choose priorities.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ealing North
Defends VAT removal as necessary to raise £1.5bn for state education investment; argues schools can minimise fee increases and that government has compensated SEND pupils with EHCPs and military families via continuity of education allowance.
Voted No
Labour · Falkirk
Supports removal of VAT exemption as fair redistribution from wealthiest to fund state education crisis; notes private school spending per pupil is 90% higher than state sector and fees have risen 55% since 2003.
Voted No
Labour · Loughborough
Supports as part of philosophy that those with broadest shoulders carry heaviest load; argues 6% at private schools vs 50% using state education justifies the measure to fund prosperity for all.
Voted No
Related Votes
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 8
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: Amendment 67
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill: Third Reading
3 Mar 2025
Opposition Day: Family businesses
26 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 1
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 6
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 4
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 2
24 Feb 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
15 Jan 2025