Finance Bill Committee: New Clause 6

Wednesday, 11 December 2024 · Division No. 67 · Commons

105Ayes
314Noes
Defeated

228 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedPro Housing Market Scrutiny(Yes)Pro Rental Sector Protection(Yes)Anti Stamp Duty Increase(Yes)Pro Government Accountability(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring an official impact assessment of how stamp duty changes affect private rents and housing supply, holding the government to account for potential unintended consequences in the rental sector

Voting No means

Oppose mandating a separate impact assessment, arguing the government has already considered these effects and that additional reporting requirements are unnecessary

What happened: Parliament voted on New Clause 6 to the Finance Bill on 11 December 2024, during the Committee stage of the legislation. The clause, tabled by the opposition, sought to modify the government's proposals on private school taxation. The amendment was defeated by 314 votes to 105.

Why it matters: The underlying policy in this part of the Finance Bill removes the VAT exemption that private schools have historically enjoyed on their education, vocational training and boarding fees. The government argues this will raise approximately 460 million pounds in additional revenue in 2024-25, funding increases to the state school budget including recruitment of additional teachers. Critics argue the change will push pupils, including those with special educational needs and disabilities, out of independent schools and into a state sector that lacks capacity to absorb them. Concerns were also raised in debate about the impact on small rural schools, faith schools, and the children of armed forces personnel covered by the continuity of education allowance.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 309 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government, while 96 Conservatives voted for the amendment alongside four Reform UK MPs, four independents, and one each from the Democratic Unionist Party and the Ulster Unionist Party. The Greens voted with the government. The opposition framed the amendment as protection for vulnerable pupils and communities; the government framed resistance to it as defending investment in state education. This division sits within a broader sequence of Finance Bill votes running through to March 2025, when the Bill passed its Third Reading by 339 votes to 172.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/277 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
96 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/32 No
Independent
4 Aye/3 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Democratic Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No

What They Said in the Debate

James Wild

Conservative · North West Norfolk

Opposed

Opposes VAT on private school fees as a cruel, ideological tax imposed mid-year that will damage education of 37,000 pupils and particularly harm SEND pupils without EHCPs, small rural schools, and faith schools; calls for new clause 8 to review impact.

Voted Aye

Munira Wilson

Liberal Democrat · Twickenham

Opposed

Opposes the tax on principle; supports new clause 9 requiring impact assessment on SEND pupils without EHCPs, warning 100,000 such pupils will face fee rises and families may seek EHCPs to avoid VAT, straining the already-failed SEND system.

Damian Hinds

Conservative · East Hampshire

Opposed

Opposes as bad policy that taxes education contrary to global norm; argues Government's 37,000 pupil displacement estimate is mathematically flawed, ignores capital costs, and will disproportionately displace SEND and faith school pupils.

Voted Aye

Shivani Raja

Conservative · Leicester East

Opposed

Opposes as tax on aspiration that harms ordinary working families (nurses, tradespeople, small business owners) who sacrificed to afford independent schools; criticises lack of proper impact assessment and mid-year implementation.

Voted Aye

Dr Kieran Mullan

Conservative · Bexhill and Battle

Opposed

Opposes as divisive framing that pits schoolchild against schoolchild; argues Government wrongly suggests not taxing private fees takes money from state schools, when UK spends £1trn+ annually and can choose priorities.

Voted Aye

James Murray

Labour · Ealing North

Supportive

Defends VAT removal as necessary to raise £1.5bn for state education investment; argues schools can minimise fee increases and that government has compensated SEND pupils with EHCPs and military families via continuity of education allowance.

Voted No

Euan Stainbank

Labour · Falkirk

Supportive

Supports removal of VAT exemption as fair redistribution from wealthiest to fund state education crisis; notes private school spending per pupil is 90% higher than state sector and fees have risen 55% since 2003.

Voted No

Dr Jeevun Sandher

Labour · Loughborough

Supportive

Supports as part of philosophy that those with broadest shoulders carry heaviest load; argues 6% at private schools vs 50% using state education justifies the measure to fund prosperity for all.

Voted No

Related Votes