Finance Bill Committee: New Clause 8
Wednesday, 11 December 2024 · Division No. 66 · Commons
153 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support requiring a government impact assessment of VAT on private school fees, particularly regarding SEND pupils, small rural schools, and faith schools
Voting No means
Oppose the reporting requirement, backing the government's decision to proceed with VAT on private school fees without mandating additional parliamentary scrutiny
What happened
On 11 December 2024, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 8 to the Finance Bill during its Committee stage. The clause would have required the Secretary of State to make formal statements to Parliament on the impact of removing VAT exemption from private school fees, with particular attention to pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), small rural schools, and faith schools. The amendment was defeated by 329 votes to 167, with the government commanding a comfortable majority.
Why it matters
The underlying policy at issue is the government's decision, introduced through clauses 47 to 49 of the Finance Bill, to remove the longstanding VAT exemption on private school fees with effect from January 2025. This measure is forecast to raise approximately 460 million pounds in additional revenue in the 2024-25 financial year, money the government intends to direct toward state education, including a 2.3 billion pound increase to the core schools budget. New Clause 8 would not have reversed that decision, but would have obliged ministers to formally account to Parliament for its effects on vulnerable groups of pupils and smaller institutions. Its defeat means the government faces no statutory reporting requirement on those impacts, even as critics warn that SEND pupils without Education, Health and Care plans, small faith schools, and families relying on armed forces continuity of education allowances face particular pressures.
The politics
The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 283 Labour MPs and 31 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while all 98 voting Conservatives and all 60 voting Liberal Democrats supported it. Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party also voted in favour. Smaller parties including the Greens and Plaid Cymru voted with the government. There were no notable rebellions on either side. The debate was combative, with Conservative MPs characterising the mid-year introduction of the measure as harmful and ideologically driven, while Labour ministers defended it as a necessary and fair reallocation of resources toward universal state education. The policy sits within a broader contested Budget following the October 2024 Autumn Statement, and the Finance Bill subsequently passed its Third Reading in March 2025 by 339 votes to 172.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · North West Norfolk
Opposes VAT on private school fees as a cruel, ideological tax imposed mid-year that will damage education of 37,000 pupils and particularly harm SEND pupils without EHCPs, small rural schools, and faith schools; calls for new clause 8 to review impact.
Voted Aye
Liberal Democrat · Twickenham
Opposes the tax on principle; supports new clause 9 requiring impact assessment on SEND pupils without EHCPs, warning 100,000 such pupils will face fee rises and families may seek EHCPs to avoid VAT, straining the already-failed SEND system.
Voted Aye
Conservative · East Hampshire
Opposes as bad policy that taxes education contrary to global norm; argues Government's 37,000 pupil displacement estimate is mathematically flawed, ignores capital costs, and will disproportionately displace SEND and faith school pupils.
Voted Aye
Conservative · Leicester East
Opposes as tax on aspiration that harms ordinary working families (nurses, tradespeople, small business owners) who sacrificed to afford independent schools; criticises lack of proper impact assessment and mid-year implementation.
Voted Aye
Conservative · Bexhill and Battle
Opposes as divisive framing that pits schoolchild against schoolchild; argues Government wrongly suggests not taxing private fees takes money from state schools, when UK spends £1trn+ annually and can choose priorities.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ealing North
Defends VAT removal as necessary to raise £1.5bn for state education investment; argues schools can minimise fee increases and that government has compensated SEND pupils with EHCPs and military families via continuity of education allowance.
Voted No
Labour · Falkirk
Supports removal of VAT exemption as fair redistribution from wealthiest to fund state education crisis; notes private school spending per pupil is 90% higher than state sector and fees have risen 55% since 2003.
Voted No
Labour · Loughborough
Supports as part of philosophy that those with broadest shoulders carry heaviest load; argues 6% at private schools vs 50% using state education justifies the measure to fund prosperity for all.
Voted No
Related Votes
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: New Clause 8
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill Report Stage: Amendment 67
3 Mar 2025
Finance Bill: Third Reading
3 Mar 2025
Opposition Day: Family businesses
26 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 1
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 6
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 4
24 Feb 2025
Crown Estate Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 2
24 Feb 2025
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 1
15 Jan 2025