The topic lensIssue · 11 divisions tagged · 12 parties active

Policing.

Police funding and neighbourhood policing

TopicPolicing
ParentCrime & Policing
RelatedKnife Crime · Fraud · Prisons
Divisions tagged
11
This parliament
Parties active
12
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Your Party
79% aligned
Recent activity
10
Most-recent divisions
§ 01Where the parties sit on policing.11 divisions · this parliament

Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.

PartyStance vs neutral midpointNet %Discipline
Labour PartyLab
-446% on-whip · 321 MPs
Conservative and Unionist PartyCon
-1238% on-whip · 107 MPs
Liberal DemocratsLD
+555% on-whip · 67 MPs
Labour and Co-operative PartyLab
-446% on-whip · 35 MPs
IndependentInd
+656% on-whip · 9 MPs
Green Party of England and WalesGrn
+1666% on-whip · 5 MPs
Democratic Unionist PartyDUP
-2624% on-whip · 5 MPs
Plaid CymruPlaid
+2070% on-whip · 3 MPs

Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions

§ 02Recent policing divisions.last 5 · of 11 tagged
DateMotionAyeNoCarried
22 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Government motion in relation to LA439
Aye: Support the government's position that proscription decisions must remain at ministerial discretion, rejecting Lords amendments compelling a formal review of IRGC proscription · No: Back the Lords in requiring the government to review proscribing the IRGC and Iran-linked groups, citing credible threats to UK national security including plots against journalists, embassies, and Jewish communities
253145Yes
14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to agree with all remaining Lords Amendments
Aye: Support passing the Crime and Policing Bill with Lords amendments, including new offences on child exploitation, retail crime, spiking, and AI-generated child sexual abuse material, alongside expanded police powers and online safety measures · No: Oppose accepting all remaining Lords amendments as a package, arguing that Lords amendment 312 poses a dangerous threat to civil liberties — including freedom of assembly, expression, and religion — and should be voted on separately rather than buried within a bundle of otherwise uncontroversial provisions
24723Yes
14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 334
Aye: Support the government's position: reject the Lords amendment abolishing non-crime hate incident recording outright, backing instead the College of Policing's recommended reform of raising the recording threshold rather than full abolition. · No: Support the Lords amendment: fully abolish the recording of non-crime hate incidents and require future guidance to give due regard to freedom of expression, arguing the government's approach is a rebranding rather than a genuine reform.
35792Yes
14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 311
Aye: Support the government's rejection of the Lords amendment, agreeing that a new lower-tier proscription power for protest groups is unnecessary and disproportionate where the terrorism threshold is not met · No: Support the Lords amendment granting the Secretary of State power to proscribe extreme criminal protest groups, arguing stronger tools are needed to tackle persistent criminal protest activity
301103Yes
14 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 342
Aye: Support the government's position of rejecting the Lords' specific evidential requirements for Youth Diversion Orders, accepting instead non-statutory guidance on considering alternatives — prioritising flexibility in counter-terrorism powers over rigid procedural safeguards. · No: Back the Lords' amendment requiring courts to consider specific evidence before imposing Youth Diversion Orders, arguing this provides stronger legal protection for young people against disproportionate counter-terrorism orders.
28371Yes

All 11 divisions on this issue →

§ 03MPs most aligned, by party.Top-3 most-on-whip per major party

By party, the MPs whose voting record on policing is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.

§ 04Where policing money lands.Council-service mapping pending
Pending — issue-to-service mapping

Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Policing” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.

Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 11 divisions