Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 311
Tuesday, 14 April 2026 · Division No. 470 · Commons
246 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the government's rejection of the Lords' amendment 311, backing the government's preferred alternative approach to the underlying issue in the Crime and Policing Bill
Voting No means
Support retaining the Lords' amendment 311, opposing the government overriding the Lords' change to the Bill
What happened: On 14 April 2026, the House of Commons voted 300 to 101 to reject Lords Amendment 311 to the Crime and Policing Bill, backing the government's position to remove this particular change made by the House of Lords. The government argued it was offering its own alternative approach to the underlying issue rather than accepting the Lords' version of the provision.
Why it matters: The Crime and Policing Bill is described by ministers as the largest criminal justice bill in a generation, covering knife crime, violence against women and girls, antisocial behaviour, sexual violence, terrorism and online harms. By rejecting Lords Amendment 311, the Commons cleared the way for the government's preferred legislative approach to the relevant area of policy. The wider Bill includes significant measures on non-consensual intimate imagery, AI chatbot regulation, image deletion orders, and protest powers, all of which affect millions of people across England and Wales and, in some provisions, the United Kingdom more broadly.
The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously for the government position, joined by most Greens, Plaid Cymru members and a majority of independents voting. All 91 Conservative MPs who voted backed the Lords amendment, as did the Democratic Unionist Party, Reform UK, Traditional Unionist Voice and Ulster Unionist Party. This was one of several related votes on the same day, with the Commons also rejecting Lords Amendments 2, 11, 333 and 334 by comparable margins. The session was marked by some internal Labour tension, with backbenchers raising concerns about protest powers and the pace of scrutiny, though none voted against the government on this specific division.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Labour · Poplar and Limehouse
Opposes the Bill as a fundamental assault on democratic freedoms, particularly Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption and identity concealment at protests, calling it a direct response to Palestine demonstrations.
Voted Aye
Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills
Urges Government to accept Lords amendments 6, 10, 11 on fly-tipping, emphasizing need for penalty points and vehicle seizure to deter criminal gangs and protect communities.
Voted No
Conservative · Gosport
Challenges Government for not adopting safety-by-design approach to AI chatbots; argues regulation should prevent harms rather than respond to them after the fact, like aircraft safety design.
Voted No
Conservative · Stockton West
Welcomes Government U-turns on fly-tipping and weapon possession penalties, but regrets rejection of amendments on closure order extensions, proscribing extreme protest groups, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Cheltenham
Supports online safety and violence against women measures, but strongly opposes cumulative disruption amendment as an assault on protest rights and calls for ban on fixed penalty notices for profit.
Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Welcomes most of Bill but strongly opposes Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption as continuation of restricting protest rights that undermine the labour movement's democratic tradition.
Voted Aye
Labour · Croydon West
Government will accept Lords amendments on intimate image abuse, strangulation pornography, and hate crime extensions, but reject amendments restricting fixed penalty notices for profit, banning AI chatbots by design, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents recording.
Voted Aye
Labour · Gower
Strongly supports Lords amendment 361 and Government amendments providing automatic pardons and record expungement for women convicted or investigated for illegal abortion under outdated law.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 11
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 333
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 334
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 342
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 357
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 359
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to agree with all remaining Lords Amendments
14 Apr 2026