Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 311
300Ayes
101Noes
Carried · majority 199 · Government won246 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 300 · No 101 · DNV 246 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 14 April 2026, the House of Commons voted to reject Lords Amendment 311 to the Crime and Policing Bill. The motion to disagree with that amendment passed by 300 votes to 101. The government, which opposed the Lords change, won the division comfortably, meaning that specific amendment will not form part of the Bill unless the Lords insist on it through the parliamentary ping-pong process. Lords Amendment 311 related to provisions connected to violence against women and girls and online harms, areas where the Crime and Policing Bill has attracted significant legislative attention. By voting to reject the Lords version, the Commons backed the government's stated preference to address the underlying issue through its own alternative approach rather than through the text the Lords had inserted. The practical effect is that the Lords' specific formulation is removed, and the government retains control over how this policy area is shaped in the final text of the Bill. The vote divided largely along party lines. All 287 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government, as did the four Green MPs and three Plaid Cymru members. Opposition came primarily from the Conservatives, with 91 of their MPs voting No, joined by the DUP (5), Reform UK (3), and the Ulster Unionist and Traditional Unionist Voice representatives. The division sits within a broader and contested parliamentary passage of the Crime and Policing Bill, with multiple Lords amendments being disputed in the same period. Critics voting No argued the Lords amendment represented proper parliamentary scrutiny of an important issue, while the government maintained its own approach was the appropriate vehicle.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government's rejection of the Lords' amendment 311, backing the government's preferred alternative approach to the underlying issue in the Crime and Policing Bill
Voting No meant
Support retaining the Lords' amendment 311, opposing the government overriding the Lords' change to the Bill
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
260
0
101
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
—
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
26
0
16
Independent
—
7
2
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
5
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moved motions to disagree with specific Lords amendments on crime and policing measures while agreeing with the majority of Lords amendments on respect orders and related provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0