Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6

Tuesday, 14 April 2026 · Division No. 468 · Commons

299Ayes
169Noes
Passed

182 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment wonTough On Fly Tipping(No)Pro Rural Communities(No)Pro Lords Scrutiny(No)Pro Environmental Enforcement(No)

Voting Yes means

Support the government rejecting the Lords' fly-tipping amendment, trusting the government's alternative approach (or lack thereof) to tackling illegal waste dumping

Voting No means

Support the Lords' amendment to introduce tougher measures against fly-tipping, arguing rural communities and landowners need stronger legal protections and enforcement powers

What happened: On 14 April 2026, MPs voted by 299 to 169 to reject Lords Amendment 6 to the Crime and Policing Bill. The Lords had passed this amendment to strengthen enforcement powers against fly-tipping, but the government opposed it and moved a motion to disagree. With Labour MPs voting solidly in favour of rejection, the government's position carried comfortably.

Why it matters: Fly-tipping is a widespread problem that imposes significant costs on landowners, local authorities and taxpayers. The Lords amendment would have introduced tougher measures to tackle illegal waste dumping, with particular relevance to rural communities and private landowners who often bear the clean-up costs. By voting down the Lords amendment, the House has declined to give enforcement agencies and affected communities the additional legal tools the Lords considered necessary. The government has not, at this stage, brought forward an alternative measure in lieu of the Lords amendment, leaving the existing legislative framework in place.

The politics: The vote split almost entirely along party lines. All 293 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted to reject the amendment, while Conservatives (89), Liberal Democrats (61), Reform UK (3) and smaller parties including the DUP, Plaid Cymru and Traditional Unionist Voice all voted to keep it. Three Green MPs backed the government's position. Conservative spokesperson Matt Vickers explicitly criticised the government for rejecting fly-tipping amendments, noting cross-party recognition that more needs to be done on the issue. This vote was one of several on 14 April in which the government used its Commons majority to overturn Lords changes to what ministers have described as the largest criminal justice bill in a generation.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
266 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/89 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/61 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
27 Aye/0 No
Independent
1 Aye/7 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/5 No
Reform UKWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Apsana Begum

Labour · Poplar and Limehouse

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as a fundamental assault on democratic freedoms, particularly Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption and identity concealment at protests, calling it a direct response to Palestine demonstrations.

Wendy Morton

Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills

Opposed

Urges Government to accept Lords amendments 6, 10, 11 on fly-tipping, emphasizing need for penalty points and vehicle seizure to deter criminal gangs and protect communities.

Voted No

Dame Caroline Dinenage

Conservative · Gosport

Questioning

Challenges Government for not adopting safety-by-design approach to AI chatbots; argues regulation should prevent harms rather than respond to them after the fact, like aircraft safety design.

Voted No

Matt Vickers

Conservative · Stockton West

Neutral

Welcomes Government U-turns on fly-tipping and weapon possession penalties, but regrets rejection of amendments on closure order extensions, proscribing extreme protest groups, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents.

Voted No

Max Wilkinson

Liberal Democrat · Cheltenham

Neutral

Supports online safety and violence against women measures, but strongly opposes cumulative disruption amendment as an assault on protest rights and calls for ban on fixed penalty notices for profit.

Voted No

Andy McDonald

Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

Neutral

Welcomes most of Bill but strongly opposes Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption as continuation of restricting protest rights that undermine the labour movement's democratic tradition.

Voted Aye

Sarah Jones

Labour · Croydon West

Supportive

Government will accept Lords amendments on intimate image abuse, strangulation pornography, and hate crime extensions, but reject amendments restricting fixed penalty notices for profit, banning AI chatbots by design, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents recording.

Voted Aye

Tonia Antoniazzi

Labour · Gower

Supportive

Strongly supports Lords amendment 361 and Government amendments providing automatic pardons and record expungement for women convicted or investigated for illegal abortion under outdated law.

Voted Aye

Related Votes

Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6 — Tuesday, 14 April 2026 | Beyond The Vote