Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
Tuesday, 14 April 2026 · Division No. 468 · Commons
182 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the government rejecting the Lords' fly-tipping amendment, trusting the government's alternative approach (or lack thereof) to tackling illegal waste dumping
Voting No means
Support the Lords' amendment to introduce tougher measures against fly-tipping, arguing rural communities and landowners need stronger legal protections and enforcement powers
What happened: On 14 April 2026, MPs voted by 299 to 169 to reject Lords Amendment 6 to the Crime and Policing Bill. The Lords had passed this amendment to strengthen enforcement powers against fly-tipping, but the government opposed it and moved a motion to disagree. With Labour MPs voting solidly in favour of rejection, the government's position carried comfortably.
Why it matters: Fly-tipping is a widespread problem that imposes significant costs on landowners, local authorities and taxpayers. The Lords amendment would have introduced tougher measures to tackle illegal waste dumping, with particular relevance to rural communities and private landowners who often bear the clean-up costs. By voting down the Lords amendment, the House has declined to give enforcement agencies and affected communities the additional legal tools the Lords considered necessary. The government has not, at this stage, brought forward an alternative measure in lieu of the Lords amendment, leaving the existing legislative framework in place.
The politics: The vote split almost entirely along party lines. All 293 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs present voted to reject the amendment, while Conservatives (89), Liberal Democrats (61), Reform UK (3) and smaller parties including the DUP, Plaid Cymru and Traditional Unionist Voice all voted to keep it. Three Green MPs backed the government's position. Conservative spokesperson Matt Vickers explicitly criticised the government for rejecting fly-tipping amendments, noting cross-party recognition that more needs to be done on the issue. This vote was one of several on 14 April in which the government used its Commons majority to overturn Lords changes to what ministers have described as the largest criminal justice bill in a generation.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Labour · Poplar and Limehouse
Opposes the Bill as a fundamental assault on democratic freedoms, particularly Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption and identity concealment at protests, calling it a direct response to Palestine demonstrations.
Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills
Urges Government to accept Lords amendments 6, 10, 11 on fly-tipping, emphasizing need for penalty points and vehicle seizure to deter criminal gangs and protect communities.
Voted No
Conservative · Gosport
Challenges Government for not adopting safety-by-design approach to AI chatbots; argues regulation should prevent harms rather than respond to them after the fact, like aircraft safety design.
Voted No
Conservative · Stockton West
Welcomes Government U-turns on fly-tipping and weapon possession penalties, but regrets rejection of amendments on closure order extensions, proscribing extreme protest groups, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Cheltenham
Supports online safety and violence against women measures, but strongly opposes cumulative disruption amendment as an assault on protest rights and calls for ban on fixed penalty notices for profit.
Voted No
Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Welcomes most of Bill but strongly opposes Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption as continuation of restricting protest rights that undermine the labour movement's democratic tradition.
Voted Aye
Labour · Croydon West
Government will accept Lords amendments on intimate image abuse, strangulation pornography, and hate crime extensions, but reject amendments restricting fixed penalty notices for profit, banning AI chatbots by design, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents recording.
Voted Aye
Labour · Gower
Strongly supports Lords amendment 361 and Government amendments providing automatic pardons and record expungement for women convicted or investigated for illegal abortion under outdated law.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 11
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 311
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 333
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 334
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 342
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 357
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 359
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to agree with all remaining Lords Amendments
14 Apr 2026