The topic lensIssue · 15 divisions tagged · 12 parties active

Crime and Policing.

Law enforcement, criminal justice, and community safety

TopicCrime and Policing
Divisions tagged
15
This parliament
Parties active
12
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Your Party
79% aligned
Recent activity
10
Most-recent divisions
§ 01Where the parties sit on crime and policing.15 divisions · this parliament

Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.

PartyStance vs neutral midpointNet %Discipline
Labour PartyLab
-1040% on-whip · 336 MPs
Conservative and Unionist PartyCon
+555% on-whip · 109 MPs
Liberal DemocratsLD
+1161% on-whip · 68 MPs
Labour and Co-operative PartyLab
-1040% on-whip · 39 MPs
IndependentInd
+959% on-whip · 10 MPs
Green Party of England and WalesGrn
+1969% on-whip · 5 MPs
Democratic Unionist PartyDUP
-1040% on-whip · 5 MPs
Plaid CymruPlaid
+1969% on-whip · 4 MPs

Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions

§ 02Recent crime and policing divisions.last 5 · of 15 tagged
DateMotionAyeNoCarried
22 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Government motion in relation to LA439
Aye: Support the government's position that proscription decisions must remain at ministerial discretion, rejecting Lords amendments compelling a formal review of IRGC proscription · No: Back the Lords in requiring the government to review proscribing the IRGC and Iran-linked groups, citing credible threats to UK national security including plots against journalists, embassies, and Jewish communities
253145Yes
20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating to Lords Amendments 2D and 2E
Aye: Support the government's compromise amendments in lieu of the Lords' versions, accepting Labour's revised positions on anti-social behaviour enforcement, fly-tipping powers, youth diversion consultations, and public order — and sending the Bill forward to Royal Assent. · No: Prefer the Lords' original amendments, arguing the government's compromise wording (using 'may' rather than binding duties) does not go far enough on protections such as mandatory consultation before youth diversion orders and stronger fly-tipping enforcement tools.
295160Yes
20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating to Lords Reason 11B
Aye: Support the government's revised compromise amendments in lieu of Lords changes, accepting Labour's modified positions on youth diversion consultation requirements, fly-tipping vehicle seizure powers, and antisocial behaviour enforcement guidance, and clearing the way for the Bill to receive Royal Assent. · No: Prefer the Lords' original amendments on these issues, arguing the government's 'may' language on statutory guidance is too weak and that stronger mandatory duties — particularly on youth diversion consultation and fly-tipping enforcement — are needed to make the legislation effective.
295157Yes
20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating Lords Reasons 359B and 439B
Aye: Support the government's compromise amendments in lieu of Lords changes, accepting softer statutory guidance rather than mandatory duties on police consultation and enforcement proportionality, and backing the bill's overall package on crime and policing. · No: Prefer the Lords' amendments, which would have imposed stronger legal requirements — such as mandatory consultation before youth diversion orders and stricter rules on fining for profit — rather than relying on non-binding statutory guidance.
294160Yes
20 Apr 2026Crime and Policing Bill: Motion relating to Lords Reason 342B
Aye: Support the government's compromise amendment on youth diversion orders, which requires statutory guidance to address wider consultation, rather than the Lords' more prescriptive mandatory consultation duty. · No: Prefer the Lords' stronger position — that police must be under a firmer, statutory obligation to consult relevant parties before seeking youth diversion orders, rather than relying on guidance that 'may' address the issue.
29563Yes

All 15 divisions on this issue →

§ 03MPs most aligned, by party.Top-3 most-on-whip per major party

By party, the MPs whose voting record on crime and policing is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.

§ 04Where crime and policing money lands.Council-service mapping pending
Pending — issue-to-service mapping

Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Crime and Policing” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.

Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 15 divisions