A divisionDivision No. 469 · Tuesday, 14 April 2026· Commons· Crime and Policing

Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 11

291Ayes
174Noes
Carried · majority 117 · Government won
185 did not vote
Aye290No175DID NOT VOTE · 185

650 Members · Aye 291 · No 174 · DNV 185 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 14 April 2026, the House of Commons voted 291 to 174 to reject Lords Amendment 11 to the Crime and Policing Bill. The Government moved to "disagree" with the amendment, meaning the Commons overturned a change that the House of Lords had inserted into the Bill. This is part of the parliamentary process known as "ping-pong," where a Bill passes back and forth between the two chambers until both agree on its final text. By rejecting Lords Amendment 11, the Government succeeded in removing whatever change the Lords had made on this point from the Bill's text. The Crime and Policing Bill is a major piece of legislation dealing with law enforcement powers and criminal justice, so amendments to it can have significant practical consequences for policing practice, civil liberties, or the rights of suspects and victims. The vote confirms the Government's preferred version of the Bill on this particular provision will proceed unless the Lords choose to insist on their amendment in subsequent exchanges. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs backed the Government unanimously, providing 288 of the 291 Ayes. The opposition united in the No lobby, with Conservatives (91), Liberal Democrats (61), the DUP (5), Greens (4), Plaid Cymru (3), Reform UK (3), and the Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voting to keep the Lords amendment. Two independents voted with the Government while five opposed it. The vote sits within a broader ping-pong sequence: a further round of votes took place on 20 April 2026, suggesting the Lords did not immediately accept the Commons' position, and disagreements on several other amendments to the same Bill were also contested around the same period.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Government's decision to reject Lords Amendment 11, removing a change the Lords made to the Crime and Policing Bill
Voting No meant
Support keeping Lords Amendment 11, backing the Lords' addition to the Crime and Policing Bill against the Government's wishes
§ 01Who voted how.465 voting Members · 185 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
261
0
100
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
61
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
26
0
16
Independent
3
5
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Sarah JonesSupportiveCroydon West
Moved motions to disagree with specific Lords amendments on crime and policing measures while agreeing with the majority of Lords amendments on respect orders and related provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0