Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 11

Tuesday, 14 April 2026 · Division No. 469 · Commons

291Ayes
174Noes
Passed

185 MPs did not vote

proceduralGovernment wonPro Government Crime Bill(Yes)Pro Lords Oversight(No)Tough On Crime(No)Parliamentary Ping Pong(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support the Government's decision to reject Lords Amendment 11, removing a change the Lords made to the Crime and Policing Bill

Voting No means

Support keeping Lords Amendment 11, backing the Lords' addition to the Crime and Policing Bill against the Government's wishes

What happened: On 14 April 2026, MPs voted to reject Lords Amendment 11 to the Crime and Policing Bill, a major piece of criminal justice legislation described by the Government as the largest of its kind in a generation. The motion to disagree with the Lords' addition passed by 291 votes to 174, meaning the Commons overrode the change that the unelected House of Lords had inserted into the Bill.

Why it matters: The vote is part of a broader process in which the Commons was asked to accept, modify, or reject a large number of changes made by the Lords to the Crime and Policing Bill. By rejecting Lords Amendment 11, MPs removed whatever provision the Lords had added at that clause, returning the Bill closer to its Commons-approved form. The Bill covers a wide range of policy areas including knife crime, antisocial behaviour, violence against women and girls, terrorism, online harms and protest powers, meaning the cumulative effect of these ping-pong votes shapes how those policies will operate in practice.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 288 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the Government's position in the Aye lobby, while Conservatives (91), Liberal Democrats (61), the Democratic Unionist Party (5), Greens (4), Plaid Cymru (3), Reform UK (3) and Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted against. Two independents voted with the Government and five against. There were no notable cross-party rebellions or Labour defections recorded in this division. The vote was one of several held on the same day, with related divisions on Lords Amendments 2, 311, 333 and 334 all producing similar Government victories.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
262 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/91 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/61 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
26 Aye/0 No
Independent
2 Aye/5 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/5 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Reform UKWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Apsana Begum

Labour · Poplar and Limehouse

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as a fundamental assault on democratic freedoms, particularly Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption and identity concealment at protests, calling it a direct response to Palestine demonstrations.

Wendy Morton

Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills

Opposed

Urges Government to accept Lords amendments 6, 10, 11 on fly-tipping, emphasizing need for penalty points and vehicle seizure to deter criminal gangs and protect communities.

Voted No

Dame Caroline Dinenage

Conservative · Gosport

Questioning

Challenges Government for not adopting safety-by-design approach to AI chatbots; argues regulation should prevent harms rather than respond to them after the fact, like aircraft safety design.

Voted No

Matt Vickers

Conservative · Stockton West

Neutral

Welcomes Government U-turns on fly-tipping and weapon possession penalties, but regrets rejection of amendments on closure order extensions, proscribing extreme protest groups, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents.

Voted No

Max Wilkinson

Liberal Democrat · Cheltenham

Neutral

Supports online safety and violence against women measures, but strongly opposes cumulative disruption amendment as an assault on protest rights and calls for ban on fixed penalty notices for profit.

Voted No

Andy McDonald

Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

Neutral

Welcomes most of Bill but strongly opposes Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption as continuation of restricting protest rights that undermine the labour movement's democratic tradition.

Voted Aye

Sarah Jones

Labour · Croydon West

Supportive

Government will accept Lords amendments on intimate image abuse, strangulation pornography, and hate crime extensions, but reject amendments restricting fixed penalty notices for profit, banning AI chatbots by design, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents recording.

Voted Aye

Tonia Antoniazzi

Labour · Gower

Supportive

Strongly supports Lords amendment 361 and Government amendments providing automatic pardons and record expungement for women convicted or investigated for illegal abortion under outdated law.

Voted Aye

Related Votes