A divisionDivision No. 469 · Tuesday, 14 April 2026· Commons· Crime and Policing

Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 11

291Ayes
174Noes
Carried · majority 117 · Government won
185 did not vote
Aye290No175DID NOT VOTE · 185

650 Members · Aye 291 · No 174 · DNV 185 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 14 April 2026 to reject Lords amendment 11 to the Crime and Policing Bill, which related to fly-tipping and littering enforcement. The government moved to disagree with the amendment, and the House backed that position by 291 votes to 174. The Bill is described as the largest criminal justice legislation in a generation, and this vote was one of several taken on the same day concerning Lords amendments across a wide range of issues. The practical effect of rejecting Lords amendment 11 is that the specific fly-tipping or littering enforcement measure the Lords had inserted will not form part of the Act as the government preferred. The government's position, as indicated in the debate, was not that fly-tipping enforcement should be ignored but that its own alternative provisions were sufficient. Ministers pointed to separate measures on fly-tipping already incorporated elsewhere, including a provision giving courts the power to issue penalty points to offenders who use vehicles to dump waste, which appeared in the government's response to a related amendment. The Lords amendment 11 itself was rejected without a government substitute offered in its place. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour of the government's motion, providing all 287 votes on the winning side, with three independents also voting aye. All 91 Conservative MPs who voted opposed the government, alongside all 61 Liberal Democrats who voted, all five Democratic Unionist Party members, all four Green MPs, all three Plaid Cymru members, all three Reform UK members who voted, and two Your Party MPs. Conservative MP Wendy Morton spoke in the debate to urge ministers to accept amendments 6, 10, and 11, citing fly-tipping as a persistent issue raised by constituents across the country.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government rejecting the Lords' fly-tipping/littering amendment, accepting that the government's alternative provisions are sufficient
Voting No meant
Support keeping the Lords' amendment on fly-tipping and littering, backing tougher or different enforcement measures than the government proposed
§ 01Who voted how.465 voting Members · 185 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
261
0
100
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
91
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
60
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
26
0
16
Independent
3
5
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Sarah JonesSupportiveCroydon West
Moved motions to disagree with specific Lords amendments on crime and policing measures while agreeing with the majority of Lords amendments on respect orders and related provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0