Crime and Policing Bill: motion to agree with all remaining Lords Amendments

Tuesday, 14 April 2026 · Division No. 476 · Commons

247Ayes
21Noes
Passed

380 MPs did not vote

centreGovernment wonPro Government Legislative Programme(Yes)Pro Civil Liberties(No)Pro Lords Scrutiny(No)Tough On Crime(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support accepting the package of Lords amendments (including government-negotiated compromises) to finalise the Crime and Policing Bill

Voting No means

Oppose the package, potentially concerned that certain Lords amendments engaging civil liberties — such as those relating to freedom of thought, religion, and expression — were not being given proper parliamentary scrutiny before being accepted or rejected

What happened: On 14 April 2026, MPs voted 247 to 21 to accept a package of remaining Lords amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, completing the parliamentary passage of one of the largest criminal justice bills in a generation. The vote finalised a set of changes negotiated between the Commons and the Lords, including some Lords amendments the government accepted, some it rejected outright, and others it replaced with alternative provisions of its own.

Why it matters: The Crime and Policing Bill covers a wide range of policing and criminal justice measures, from knife crime and antisocial behaviour to online harms, non-consensual intimate images, terrorism glorification, and protest conditions. The Lords amendments that were accepted or replaced in this final vote include new requirements on tech platforms to remove non-consensual intimate imagery, powers to extend Online Safety Act regulation to AI chatbots, changes to how police consider cumulative disruption when imposing conditions on protests, and provisions on automatic pardons for women previously convicted in relation to their own pregnancy. These changes affect the public, law enforcement agencies, technology companies, and civil society.

The politics: The vote was overwhelmingly carried, with Labour MPs providing the bulk of the 247 ayes. The 21 votes against came mainly from Labour rebels alongside Plaid Cymru members and a handful of independents, motivated chiefly by concerns about civil liberties, including freedom of expression, religion, and the right to protest. The Conservatives were entirely absent from the vote. A notable flashpoint was Lords amendment 312, on so-called cumulative disruption powers for police at protests, which several Labour backbenchers objected to both on substance and because they argued it was not given a separate debate and vote. The broader legislative context saw multiple separate divisions on the same day, with the government winning each comfortably, as it pushed to conclude the bill's passage.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
218 Aye/15 No

15 rebels: Andy McDonald, Apsana Begum, Brian Leishman, Grahame Morris, Ian Byrne, Ian Lavery, Imran Hussain, John McDonnell + 7 more

Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
21 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Independent
1 Aye/3 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Green Party of England and Wales
0 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

15 MPs voted against their party whip

What They Said in the Debate

Apsana Begum

Labour · Poplar and Limehouse

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as a fundamental assault on democratic freedoms, particularly Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption and identity concealment at protests, calling it a direct response to Palestine demonstrations.

Voted No

Wendy Morton

Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills

Opposed

Urges Government to accept Lords amendments 6, 10, 11 on fly-tipping, emphasizing need for penalty points and vehicle seizure to deter criminal gangs and protect communities.

Dame Caroline Dinenage

Conservative · Gosport

Questioning

Challenges Government for not adopting safety-by-design approach to AI chatbots; argues regulation should prevent harms rather than respond to them after the fact, like aircraft safety design.

Matt Vickers

Conservative · Stockton West

Neutral

Welcomes Government U-turns on fly-tipping and weapon possession penalties, but regrets rejection of amendments on closure order extensions, proscribing extreme protest groups, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents.

Max Wilkinson

Liberal Democrat · Cheltenham

Neutral

Supports online safety and violence against women measures, but strongly opposes cumulative disruption amendment as an assault on protest rights and calls for ban on fixed penalty notices for profit.

Andy McDonald

Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

Neutral

Welcomes most of Bill but strongly opposes Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption as continuation of restricting protest rights that undermine the labour movement's democratic tradition.

Voted No

Sarah Jones

Labour · Croydon West

Supportive

Government will accept Lords amendments on intimate image abuse, strangulation pornography, and hate crime extensions, but reject amendments restricting fixed penalty notices for profit, banning AI chatbots by design, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents recording.

Voted Aye

Tonia Antoniazzi

Labour · Gower

Supportive

Strongly supports Lords amendment 361 and Government amendments providing automatic pardons and record expungement for women convicted or investigated for illegal abortion under outdated law.

Voted Aye

Related Votes

Crime and Policing Bill: motion to agree with all remaining Lords Amendments — Tuesday, 14 April 2026 | Beyond The Vote