Crime and Policing Bill: motion to agree with all remaining Lords Amendments
Tuesday, 14 April 2026 · Division No. 476 · Commons
380 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support accepting the package of Lords amendments (including government-negotiated compromises) to finalise the Crime and Policing Bill
Voting No means
Oppose the package, potentially concerned that certain Lords amendments engaging civil liberties — such as those relating to freedom of thought, religion, and expression — were not being given proper parliamentary scrutiny before being accepted or rejected
What happened: On 14 April 2026, MPs voted 247 to 21 to accept a package of remaining Lords amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, completing the parliamentary passage of one of the largest criminal justice bills in a generation. The vote finalised a set of changes negotiated between the Commons and the Lords, including some Lords amendments the government accepted, some it rejected outright, and others it replaced with alternative provisions of its own.
Why it matters: The Crime and Policing Bill covers a wide range of policing and criminal justice measures, from knife crime and antisocial behaviour to online harms, non-consensual intimate images, terrorism glorification, and protest conditions. The Lords amendments that were accepted or replaced in this final vote include new requirements on tech platforms to remove non-consensual intimate imagery, powers to extend Online Safety Act regulation to AI chatbots, changes to how police consider cumulative disruption when imposing conditions on protests, and provisions on automatic pardons for women previously convicted in relation to their own pregnancy. These changes affect the public, law enforcement agencies, technology companies, and civil society.
The politics: The vote was overwhelmingly carried, with Labour MPs providing the bulk of the 247 ayes. The 21 votes against came mainly from Labour rebels alongside Plaid Cymru members and a handful of independents, motivated chiefly by concerns about civil liberties, including freedom of expression, religion, and the right to protest. The Conservatives were entirely absent from the vote. A notable flashpoint was Lords amendment 312, on so-called cumulative disruption powers for police at protests, which several Labour backbenchers objected to both on substance and because they argued it was not given a separate debate and vote. The broader legislative context saw multiple separate divisions on the same day, with the government winning each comfortably, as it pushed to conclude the bill's passage.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
15 rebels: Andy McDonald, Apsana Begum, Brian Leishman, Grahame Morris, Ian Byrne, Ian Lavery, Imran Hussain, John McDonnell + 7 more
15 MPs voted against their party whip
What They Said in the Debate
Labour · Poplar and Limehouse
Opposes the Bill as a fundamental assault on democratic freedoms, particularly Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption and identity concealment at protests, calling it a direct response to Palestine demonstrations.
Voted No
Conservative · Aldridge-Brownhills
Urges Government to accept Lords amendments 6, 10, 11 on fly-tipping, emphasizing need for penalty points and vehicle seizure to deter criminal gangs and protect communities.
Conservative · Gosport
Challenges Government for not adopting safety-by-design approach to AI chatbots; argues regulation should prevent harms rather than respond to them after the fact, like aircraft safety design.
Conservative · Stockton West
Welcomes Government U-turns on fly-tipping and weapon possession penalties, but regrets rejection of amendments on closure order extensions, proscribing extreme protest groups, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents.
Liberal Democrat · Cheltenham
Supports online safety and violence against women measures, but strongly opposes cumulative disruption amendment as an assault on protest rights and calls for ban on fixed penalty notices for profit.
Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Welcomes most of Bill but strongly opposes Lords amendment 312 on cumulative disruption as continuation of restricting protest rights that undermine the labour movement's democratic tradition.
Voted No
Labour · Croydon West
Government will accept Lords amendments on intimate image abuse, strangulation pornography, and hate crime extensions, but reject amendments restricting fixed penalty notices for profit, banning AI chatbots by design, and abolishing non-crime hate incidents recording.
Voted Aye
Labour · Gower
Strongly supports Lords amendment 361 and Government amendments providing automatic pardons and record expungement for women convicted or investigated for illegal abortion under outdated law.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 11
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 311
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 333
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 334
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 342
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 357
14 Apr 2026
Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 359
14 Apr 2026