Divisions tagged
9
This parliament
Parties active
11
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Labour Party
89% aligned
Recent activity
9
Most-recent divisions
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +39 | 89% on-whip · 315 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -39 | 11% on-whip · 109 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | -36 | 14% on-whip · 67 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +38 | 88% on-whip · 35 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | -12 | 38% on-whip · 8 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | -14 | 36% on-whip · 7 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | -41 | 9% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | -43 | 7% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: Motion relating to Lords Reason 88Q Aye: Support giving the government a time-limited reserve power to set minimum private-market asset allocation targets for pension schemes, arguing this will channel pension savings into productive UK investment without overriding savers' interests · No: Oppose mandating pension scheme investment allocations, arguing it risks poor returns for pensioners, amounts to government picking winners, and that the pension industry itself opposes compulsion — preferring facilitation over diktat | 280 | 165 | Yes |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 77 Aye: Support rejecting the Lords amendment, accepting the government's position that a statutory review of public sector pension sustainability is unnecessary · No: Oppose rejecting the Lords amendment, backing the call for a transparent review of the long-term costs and intergenerational fairness of public sector pensions | 272 | 96 | Yes |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 35 Aye: Support the government's position by rejecting the Lords amendment, backing the Pension Schemes Bill as the government intends — including consolidation of pension schemes, mandatory scale requirements, and reserve powers to direct pension investment into private assets · No: Support the Lords amendment, opposing the government's approach — arguing that mandatory consolidation and state direction of pension investment are heavy-handed, that smaller well-run schemes should be exempt from scale requirements, and that the government is overreaching into people's private savings | 277 | 161 | Yes |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Pensions Scheme Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5 Aye: Support the government's decision to reject the Lords' amendment and restore the original bill text on this pension-related provision · No: Support retaining the Lords' amendment and accepting the change the upper chamber made to the Pensions Scheme Bill | 271 | 104 | Yes |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 78 Aye: Back the government in removing the Lords' requirement for a review of public sector pension scheme costs and sustainability, arguing it is unnecessary or outside the scope of the Bill. · No: Support the Lords' call for a transparent review of long-term public sector pension liabilities — estimated at around £1.4 trillion — and their fairness to future taxpayers. | 280 | 149 | Yes |
All 9 divisions on this issue →
By party, the MPs whose voting record on pensions and retirement is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.
LabLabour Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Johnson | Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham | 100% |
| Debbie Abrahams | Oldham East and Saddleworth | 100% |
| Mark Ferguson | Gateshead Central and Whickham | 100% |
ConConservative and Unionist Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Francois | Rayleigh and Wickford | 20% |
| Jesse Norman | Hereford and South Herefordshire | 20% |
| Steve Barclay | North East Cambridgeshire | 17% |
LDLiberal Democrats
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Layla Moran | Oxford West and Abingdon | 29% |
| Max Wilkinson | Cheltenham | 20% |
| Luke Taylor | Sutton and Cheam | 20% |
LabLabour and Co-operative Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Turley | Redcar | 100% |
| Sarah Hall | Warrington South | 100% |
| Stella Creasy | Walthamstow | 89% |
IndIndependent
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Norris | North East Somerset and Hanham | 89% |
| Rosie Duffield | Canterbury | 50% |
| Shockat Adam | Leicester South | 38% |
SNPScottish National Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Gethins | Arbroath and Broughty Ferry | 43% |
| Brendan O'Hara | Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber | 33% |
| Stephen Flynn | Aberdeen South | 33% |
Pending — issue-to-service mapping
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Pensions and Retirement” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.
Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 9 divisions