Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | -50 | 0% on-whip · 232 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | +50 | 100% on-whip · 84 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 58 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | -50 | 0% on-whip · 26 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +7 | 57% on-whip · 8 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | +50 | 100% on-whip · 4 MPs | |
| Plaid Cymru | Plaid | +50 | 100% on-whip · 4 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Jun 2026 | Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 13 Aye: Support adding New Clause 13 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, likely an opposition or backbench amendment seeking to change or extend the bill's provisions on network and information systems security. · No: Reject New Clause 13, backing the government's preferred version of the bill without this addition. | 79 | 257 | No |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 14 Aye: Support adding New Clause 14 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill · No: Oppose New Clause 14, preferring the Bill to proceed without this addition | 153 | 256 | No |
| 16 Jun 2026 | Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: Amendment 3 Aye: Support Amendment 3 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, likely seeking to change or add to the bill's provisions on network and information systems security · No: Oppose Amendment 3, preferring the bill to proceed without this change — most likely the government defending its own text against an opposition or backbench amendment | 164 | 246 | No |
All 3 divisions on this issue →
By party, the MPs whose voting record on cyber security is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.
LabLabour Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Barry Gardiner | Brent West | 0% |
| Clive Betts | Sheffield South East | 0% |
| John Healey | Rawmarsh and Conisbrough | 0% |
LDLiberal Democrats
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Ed Davey | Kingston and Surbiton | 100% |
| Andrew George | St Ives | 100% |
| Tim Farron | Westmorland and Lonsdale | 100% |
LabLabour and Co-operative Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Gareth Thomas | Harrow West | 0% |
| Chris Evans | Caerphilly | 0% |
| Jonathan Reynolds | Stalybridge and Hyde | 0% |
IndIndependent
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Easton | North Down | 100% |
| Cameron Thomas | Tewkesbury | 100% |
| Ayoub Khan | Birmingham Perry Barr | 100% |
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Cyber Security” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.