Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: Amendment 3
162Ayes
246Noes
Defeated · majority 84 · Government won237 did not vote
645 Members · Aye 162 · No 246 · DNV 237 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Amendment 3 to the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill was defeated on 16 June 2026 by 246 votes to 162. The amendment was tabled by Sir Iain Duncan Smith (Conservative, Chingford and Woodford Green) and concerned the disclosure of data to foreign jurisdictions where a fair trial cannot be guaranteed for British citizens. The government, backed by Labour MPs, voted it down. The amendment sought to restrict circumstances in which data could be shared with foreign governments or courts that do not guarantee fair trial rights. Supporters argued that disclosing information to such jurisdictions risks contributing to unjust convictions of British citizens abroad and that the bill, while welcome, failed to address this gap. The bill as a whole updates the regulatory framework for network and information systems security across critical infrastructure, building on the original 2018 NIS regulations. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 243 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment. The Conservatives provided 84 of the 162 ayes, joined by all 59 voting Liberal Democrats, all 5 Greens, all 4 Plaid Cymru members, all 4 DUP members, 2 Reform UK members, and 1 Traditional Unionist Voice MP. Three independents voted on each side. The amendment's defeat followed two other opposition amendment defeats on the same day, with New Clause 13 falling 255 to 77 and New Clause 14 falling 258 to 151.
Voting Aye meant
Support Amendment 3 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, likely seeking to change or add to the bill's provisions on network and information systems security
Voting No meant
Oppose Amendment 3, preferring the bill to proceed without this change — most likely the government defending its own text against an opposition or backbench amendment
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.
Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
220
140
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
84
0
32
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
58
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
23
19
Independent
—
4
3
6
Reform UK
—
2
0
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division
Supports expanding Bill scope to retail, manufacturing, local government, elections and political parties; calls for digital sovereignty strategy to reduce reliance on US cloud providers and prioritise British tech procurement.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,465 words) →
Backs selective expansion to large retail businesses (£12bn+ revenue threshold) and calls for review of foreign state-owned cellular IoT providers; concerned about public sector lock-in to AWS and Microsoft.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,828 words) →
Supports the Bill but champions Amendment 3 to prohibit data-sharing with countries lacking fair trial guarantees; warns against treating totalitarian states as normal commercial actors.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,958 words) →
Agrees with concerns on Jimmy Lai, Jagtar Singh Johal, and IoT kill switches in critical infrastructure; supports human rights safeguards in data-sharing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,686 words) →
Questions practical feasibility of digital sovereignty strategy given prevalence of Taiwanese chips in tech supply chains.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (32 words) →
Urges integration of Belfast's cyber-security sector (2,750 employees, £258m GVA) into national cyber strategy and calls for use of British tech firms by government.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0