A divisionDivision No. 31 · Wednesday, 17 June 2026· Commons· National Security

National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 13

135Ayes
258Noes
Defeated · majority 123 · Government won
253 did not vote
Aye136No258DID NOT VOTE · 253

646 Members · Aye 135 · No 258 · DNV 253 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Division 31 on Amendment 13 to the National Security (State Threats) Bill took place on 17 June 2026. The amendment was defeated by 258 votes to 135. The bill was being considered in committee, the stage at which MPs examine legislation line by line and propose changes to its text. The amendment sits within a broader package of proposed changes to the bill, which the government describes as essential to addressing growing state threat activity. The director general of MI5 had noted a rise of more than a third in the number of individuals under investigation for state threat work, and the Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, framed the bill as a response to a security environment in which hostile actors have become more sophisticated. The detailed content of Amendment 13 itself is not fully set out in the available Hansard extracts, but the wider debate on the same day touched on concerns about executive power, parliamentary oversight, access to justice, and the scope of the Intelligence and Security Committee. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 220 Labour MPs and 26 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, as did all five Green MPs and all four Plaid Cymru MPs. The Conservatives supplied 77 of the 135 votes in favour, with the Liberal Democrats adding 55. One Reform UK MP and one Democratic Unionist Party MP also voted for the amendment. Two independents voted on each side.

Voting Aye meant
Support Amendment 13 to the National Security (State Threats) Bill, the precise effect of which is not discernible from the available debate record
Voting No meant
Oppose Amendment 13, likely reflecting the government's position that the Bill as drafted already strikes the right balance on security powers, oversight, and human rights compliance
§ 01Who voted how.393 voting Members · 253 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
220
140
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
77
0
39
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
55
0
17
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
2
2
8
Reform UK
1
0
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
5
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0