A divisionDivision No. 25 · Tuesday, 16 June 2026· Commons· Cyber Security

Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 14

151Ayes
258Noes
Defeated · majority 107 · Government won
238 did not vote
Aye151No258DID NOT VOTE · 238

647 Members · Aye 151 · No 258 · DNV 238 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 16 June 2026 on New Clause 14 to the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill, a government measure aimed at strengthening the UK's defences against cyber attacks. The clause, tabled by the Conservative opposition, was defeated by 258 votes to 151. New Clause 14 would have required the Secretary of State to establish and maintain, by regulation, a list of foreign powers presenting a significant cyber-security risk to the UK. It would also have strengthened the link between intelligence agencies and policy enforcement by obliging the Secretary of State to base decisions about special national security direction powers on verified risk assessments from GCHQ regarding hostile states and state-affiliated groups. By defeating the clause, Parliament kept the Bill in its original form without this mandatory foreign-powers register. The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted opposed the clause, while every Conservative and Liberal Democrat who voted supported it, joined by Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, Traditional Unionist Voice, and two Reform UK MPs. Three Independents voted in favour and three against. There were no notable cross-party rebels on the government side.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 14 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
Voting No meant
Oppose New Clause 14, preferring the Bill to proceed without this addition
§ 01Who voted how.409 voting Members · 238 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
228
134
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
82
0
34
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
55
0
16
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
25
17
Independent
4
2
5
Reform UK
2
0
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
5
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Victoria CollinsSupportiveHarpenden and Berkhamsted
Supports expanding Bill scope to retail, manufacturing, local government, elections and political parties; calls for digital sovereignty strategy to reduce reliance on US cloud providers and prioritise British tech procurement.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,465 words)
Dame Chi OnwurahSupportiveNewcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Backs selective expansion to large retail businesses (£12bn+ revenue threshold) and calls for review of foreign state-owned cellular IoT providers; concerned about public sector lock-in to AWS and Microsoft.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,828 words)
Sir Iain Duncan SmithSupportiveChingford and Woodford Green
Supports the Bill but champions Amendment 3 to prohibit data-sharing with countries lacking fair trial guarantees; warns against treating totalitarian states as normal commercial actors.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,958 words)
Matt WesternSupportiveWarwick and Leamington
Agrees with concerns on Jimmy Lai, Jagtar Singh Johal, and IoT kill switches in critical infrastructure; supports human rights safeguards in data-sharing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,686 words)
Peter FortuneQuestioningBromley and Biggin Hill
Questions practical feasibility of digital sovereignty strategy given prevalence of Taiwanese chips in tech supply chains.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (32 words)
Jim ShannonSupportiveStrangford
Urges integration of Belfast's cyber-security sector (2,750 employees, £258m GVA) into national cyber strategy and calls for use of British tech firms by government.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0