A divisionDivision No. 24 · Tuesday, 16 June 2026· Commons· Cyber Security

Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 13

77Ayes
255Noes
Defeated · majority 178 · Government won
311 did not vote
Aye77No255DID NOT VOTE · 311

643 Members · Aye 77 · No 255 · DNV 311 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons rejected New Clause 13 to the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill on 16 June 2026, by 255 votes to 77. The new clause, proposed by the Liberal Democrats, would have required the Secretary of State to publish a Digital Sovereignty Strategy within 12 months of the Act passing, setting out how the government would assess and manage risks from foreign interference and reliance on foreign-supplied technologies in critical national infrastructure, and how it would build domestic capacity to reduce that reliance. The vote matters because it concerns whether the government would be legally required to produce a coherent strategy for protecting the UK's essential services, digital service providers, managed service providers and critical suppliers from foreign technology risks. The new clause would have covered hardware, software, supply chains and procurement processes, with a specific focus on government digital procurement and promoting British technology suppliers. Its defeat means the Bill will proceed without this obligation, leaving such decisions to ministerial discretion rather than a statutory framework. The parties divided sharply along government and opposition lines. All 228 Labour MPs and all 26 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the new clause. The Liberal Democrats provided the core support, with all 58 of their voting MPs backing it, alongside all five Green MPs, all four Plaid Cymru MPs, all four Democratic Unionist Party MPs, both Your Party MPs, one SDLP MP and one Traditional Unionist Voice MP. The Conservatives had no vote recorded in this division, having signalled through their spokesperson that they would not back the new clause. Three Independents voted Aye and three voted No.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 13 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, likely an opposition or backbench amendment seeking to change or extend the bill's provisions on network and information systems security.
Voting No meant
Reject New Clause 13, backing the government's preferred version of the bill without this addition.
§ 01Who voted how.332 voting Members · 311 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
228
132
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
57
0
14
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
26
16
Independent
4
3
6
Reform UK
0
0
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Victoria CollinsSupportiveHarpenden and Berkhamsted
Supports expanding Bill scope to retail, manufacturing, local government, elections and political parties; calls for digital sovereignty strategy to reduce reliance on US cloud providers and prioritise British tech procurement.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,465 words)
Dame Chi OnwurahSupportiveNewcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Backs selective expansion to large retail businesses (£12bn+ revenue threshold) and calls for review of foreign state-owned cellular IoT providers; concerned about public sector lock-in to AWS and Microsoft.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,828 words)
Sir Iain Duncan SmithSupportiveChingford and Woodford Green
Supports the Bill but champions Amendment 3 to prohibit data-sharing with countries lacking fair trial guarantees; warns against treating totalitarian states as normal commercial actors.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,958 words)
Matt WesternSupportiveWarwick and Leamington
Agrees with concerns on Jimmy Lai, Jagtar Singh Johal, and IoT kill switches in critical infrastructure; supports human rights safeguards in data-sharing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,686 words)
Peter FortuneQuestioningBromley and Biggin Hill
Questions practical feasibility of digital sovereignty strategy given prevalence of Taiwanese chips in tech supply chains.Unknown · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (32 words)
Jim ShannonSupportiveStrangford
Urges integration of Belfast's cyber-security sector (2,750 employees, £258m GVA) into national cyber strategy and calls for use of British tech firms by government.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0