A divisionDivision No. 24 · Tuesday, 16 June 2026· Commons· Cyber Security

Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remaining Stages: New Clause 13

77Ayes
255Noes
Defeated · majority 178 · Government won
311 did not vote
Aye79No257DID NOT VOTE · 311

643 Members · Aye 77 · No 255 · DNV 311 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 16 June 2026 on New Clause 13, a proposed addition to the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill. The clause was defeated by 255 votes to 77. The bill, which updates the rules governing security of network and information systems, proceeded without the addition. The precise content of New Clause 13 is not available in the record for this division. What is clear is that the bill updates the UK's existing framework for cyber security and the protection of critical national infrastructure. The defeat of the clause means the bill will continue through Parliament in its existing form, without whatever provision New Clause 13 would have introduced. The vote divided sharply along government and opposition lines. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative Party MP who voted opposed the clause, providing the 255 noes. Support came almost entirely from opposition parties: the Liberal Democrats supplied the largest bloc of 57 ayes, joined by all five Green MPs, all four Plaid Cymru MPs, four Democratic Unionist Party MPs, two Your Party MPs, one SDLP MP, and one Traditional Unionist Voice MP. Three independents voted aye and three voted no. The vote took place on the same day as two other divisions on the bill, Amendment 3 (lost 162 to 246) and New Clause 14 (lost 151 to 258), suggesting a sustained but unsuccessful effort by opposition parties to reshape the legislation.

Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 13 to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, likely an opposition or backbench amendment seeking to change or extend the bill's provisions on network and information systems security.
Voting No meant
Reject New Clause 13, backing the government's preferred version of the bill without this addition.
§ 01Who voted how.332 voting Members · 311 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
228
132
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
58
0
14
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
26
16
Independent
3
3
6
Reform UK
0
0
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Victoria CollinsSupportiveHarpenden and Berkhamsted
Supports expanding Bill scope to retail, manufacturing, local government, elections and political parties; calls for digital sovereignty strategy to reduce reliance on US cloud providers and prioritise British tech procurement.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (5,465 words)
Dame Chi OnwurahSupportiveNewcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Backs selective expansion to large retail businesses (£12bn+ revenue threshold) and calls for review of foreign state-owned cellular IoT providers; concerned about public sector lock-in to AWS and Microsoft.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,828 words)
Sir Iain Duncan SmithSupportiveChingford and Woodford Green
Supports the Bill but champions Amendment 3 to prohibit data-sharing with countries lacking fair trial guarantees; warns against treating totalitarian states as normal commercial actors.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,958 words)
Matt WesternSupportiveWarwick and Leamington
Agrees with concerns on Jimmy Lai, Jagtar Singh Johal, and IoT kill switches in critical infrastructure; supports human rights safeguards in data-sharing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,686 words)
Peter FortuneQuestioningBromley and Biggin Hill
Questions practical feasibility of digital sovereignty strategy given prevalence of Taiwanese chips in tech supply chains.Unknown · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (32 words)
Jim ShannonSupportiveStrangford
Urges integration of Belfast's cyber-security sector (2,750 employees, £258m GVA) into national cyber strategy and calls for use of British tech firms by government.Unknown · Voted aye · Read full speech (103 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0