A divisionDivision No. 426 · Wednesday, 11 February 2026· Commons· Climate Change

Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Maritime Activities) Order 2026

362Ayes
107Noes
Carried · majority 255 · Government won
180 did not vote
Aye362No107DID NOT VOTE · 180

649 Members · Aye 362 · No 107 · DNV 180 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 11 February 2026 to extend the UK's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) to cover maritime shipping activities. The order passed by 362 votes to 107, a comfortable government majority. The ETS is the UK's main carbon pricing mechanism, under which industries must purchase allowances for the carbon dioxide they emit -- the vote means shipping companies operating in UK waters will now be brought into that system. The practical effect is that ships will be required to pay for their carbon emissions, creating a financial incentive to reduce fuel consumption and invest in cleaner technologies. The policy is designed to align the maritime sector with the UK's broader climate commitments and follows similar moves by the European Union, which extended its own ETS to shipping in 2024. The measure affects shipping companies, port operators, and by extension the costs of goods transported by sea -- a significant portion of UK trade. The vote divided largely along party lines. Labour and its Co-operative partners, the Liberal Democrats, the SNP, the Greens, and Plaid Cymru all voted in favour. The Conservatives, Reform UK, and the Democratic Unionist Party voted against, with the opposition broadly citing concerns about costs to the maritime industry. There were no notable cross-party rebellions. The vote came one week after a closely related division on 4 February 2026 extending the ETS more broadly, which also passed comfortably with 392 votes to 116.

Voting Aye meant
Support extending carbon pricing to the maritime sector as part of the UK's net zero agenda, accepting that higher costs for shipping and ferries are a necessary part of decarbonising transport
Voting No meant
Oppose extending the ETS to maritime activities, citing concerns about increased costs for ferry travel to UK islands and questioning the impact on island communities
§ 01Who voted how.469 voting Members · 180 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
260
0
101
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
92
24
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
52
0
20
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
31
0
11
Independent
7
3
3
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
4
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0