A divisionDivision No. 426 · Wednesday, 11 February 2026· Commons· Climate Change

Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Maritime Activities) Order 2026

362Ayes
107Noes
Carried · majority 255 · Government won
180 did not vote
Aye362No107DID NOT VOTE · 180

649 Members · Aye 362 · No 107 · DNV 180 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 11 February 2026 to extend the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) to cover maritime shipping. The order, Division 426, passed by 362 votes to 107, with the government supporting the measure. It requires ferry and cargo operators to monitor their greenhouse gas emissions and purchase allowances to cover them, bringing the maritime sector within the existing cap-and-trade framework established under the Climate Change Act 2008. The practical effect is that shipping companies operating within UK waters will face a carbon cost they do not currently pay. Operators must surrender allowances for each tonne of greenhouse gas they emit, and those costs are expected to be passed on to consumers through higher fares and goods prices. Critics focused on communities where sea transport is the only option, particularly Northern Ireland, which depends on maritime routes to move goods to and from Great Britain, and the Isle of Wight, where ferries are the sole means of reaching the mainland. The Scottish islands were granted an exemption, and opponents argued that failing to extend that exemption to other island communities was inconsistent and unfair. Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens. Conservatives voted unanimously against, as did the Democratic Unionist Party and Reform UK. The DUP and one Conservative MP, Joe Robertson (Isle of Wight), made the most pointed interventions, arguing that the measure would compound existing cost pressures on their constituents without producing meaningful emissions reductions, since no alternative to sea transport exists. The vote follows a related division on 4 February 2026, when Parliament backed a broader set of UK ETS amendments by 392 to 116, suggesting the maritime extension was always likely to pass.

Voting Aye meant
Support extending carbon pricing to the maritime sector as part of the UK's net zero strategy, accepting higher costs as necessary for emissions reduction.
Voting No meant
Oppose the extension on grounds that it unfairly burdens island communities — especially Northern Ireland and the Isle of Wight — where sea transport is the only option, passing costs onto consumers without viable alternatives.
§ 01Who voted how.469 voting Members · 180 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
260
0
101
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
92
24
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
52
0
19
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
31
0
11
Independent
6
3
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
4
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
2
0
2
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.5 principal speakers
Chris McDonaldSupportiveStockton North
The ETS extension to maritime is necessary for decarbonisation, supports net zero, and protects industry competitiveness; the 50% Northern Ireland reduction ensures parity with Republic of Ireland routes and government offers £448m in decarbonisation support.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,884 words)
Andrew BowieOpposedWest Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
The extension is a pernicious carbon tax harming UK maritime competitiveness, imposes £175m in administrative costs, lacks practical alternatives for decarbonisation, and unfairly exempts Scottish islands while burdening oil and gas support vessels and other UK islands.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,632 words)
Joe RobertsonOpposedIsle of Wight East
Scottish islands receive exemptions but Isle of Wight does not despite equally vital ferry connections; the policy increases travel costs to islands already at disadvantage and contradicts government statements about supporting left-behind communities.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,036 words)
Sammy WilsonOpposedEast Antrim
The measure imposes disproportionate costs on Northern Ireland which depends on maritime transport for trade with Great Britain; administrative costs are poorly estimated (£103m-£287m), there is no support package for transition, and a six-month implementation timeline is unrealistic.Democratic Unionist Party · Voted no · Read full speech (1,435 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
The exemption for Scottish islands but not Northern Ireland or Rathlin Island is fundamentally unfair; the measure is effectively a carbon tax on isolated constituents with no real alternatives, and the six-month timeline is impossibly short given the EU's three-year transition.Traditional Unionist Voice · Voted no · Read full speech (1,066 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0