A divisionDivision No. 425 · Wednesday, 4 February 2026· Commons· Climate Change

Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026

392Ayes
116Noes
Carried · majority 276 · Government won
141 did not vote
Aye392No116DID NOT VOTE · 141

649 Members · Aye 392 · No 116 · DNV 141 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 4 February 2026, MPs approved the Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026, a statutory instrument (a form of secondary legislation that does not require a full bill) by 392 votes to 116. The order makes changes to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme, most notably by beginning to phase out free carbon allowances given to energy-intensive industries such as steel and cement, as part of the transition to a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. The practical effect of the order is to reduce the number of free allowances that domestic producers in sectors at risk of carbon leakage receive, and to replace that protection with border tariffs on imported goods. Supporters argued this maintains a level playing field between UK producers and overseas competitors while advancing decarbonisation. Critics argued it raises the carbon tax burden on British businesses and, through cost pass-through, on consumers, pointing to the Government's own impact assessment as evidence that prices could rise. The vote divided sharply along party lines. Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the SNP, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens all voted in favour; the Conservatives and Reform UK voted against, as did the Democratic Unionist Party. There were no Conservative ayes and no Labour noes. The result reflects the Government's majority and its stated commitment to net zero, set against an opposition that has framed carbon pricing reform as an additional cost on households already under financial pressure.

Voting Aye meant
Support phasing out free carbon allowances for industry as part of the transition to a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, accepting some cost increases as a necessary step toward decarbonisation
Voting No meant
Oppose reducing free carbon allowances, arguing it increases the carbon tax burden on British businesses and consumers at a time of financial pressure, without equivalent benefit
§ 01Who voted how.508 voting Members · 141 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
287
0
74
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
98
18
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
50
0
21
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
6
3
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
9
0
0
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
8
0
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Chris McDonaldSupportiveStockton North
The amendments improve scheme fairness, support decarbonisation, maintain industry competitiveness through EU linkage, and were developed through extensive stakeholder consultation.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,084 words)
Claire CoutinhoOpposedEast Surrey
The measures reduce free allowances, increase the carbon tax, raise energy bills and consumer costs, and will drive UK industry abroad to more polluting countries, defeating the purpose of decarbonisation.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (2,341 words)
Richard TiceOpposedBoston and Skegness
The emissions trading scheme and EU linkage drive up electricity bills, making industry uncompetitive and causing closures; this sends jobs and emissions overseas rather than reducing global carbon.Reform UK · Voted no · Read full speech (424 words)
Sadik Al-HassanSupportiveNorth Somerset
The order fairly addresses pandemic-related production disruptions, updates benchmarks to drive decarbonisation, and ensures level playing field between domestic and imported goods.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (529 words)
Gareth SnellQuestioningStoke-on-Trent Central
The ceramics sector should receive consideration for reallocation of free allowances given its difficult decarbonisation path and exclusion from CBAM, and clarity is needed on future carbon cap trajectory.Labour/Co-op · Voted aye · Read full speech (821 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
Removing free allowances inevitably raises costs passed to consumers; EU benchmark linkage is a blank cheque; Northern Ireland electricity's separate scheme status creates regulatory ambiguity.TUV · Voted no · Read full speech (582 words)
Steve BarclayQuestioningNorth East Cambridgeshire
The impact assessment contains contradictory claims about whether costs fall on business or are passed through to households at 80-90% cost-pass-through rates.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (117 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0