Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: Amendment 3

Monday, 12 January 2026 · Division No. 401 · Commons

185Ayes
344Noes
Defeated

119 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment defeatedAnti Stealth Tax(Yes)Pro Taxpayer Transparency(Yes)Income Tax Threshold Freeze(No)Pro Fiscal Consolidation(No)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring HMRC to proactively inform people when frozen tax thresholds cause them to start paying income tax or move into a higher rate band, increasing transparency around the stealth tax effect.

Voting No means

Oppose the notification requirement, either accepting the current system without such obligations or viewing the amendment as unnecessary given existing communications — effectively defending the government's continued threshold freeze policy.

What happened: On 12 January 2026, the House of Commons, sitting as a Committee of the whole House, voted on Amendment 3 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill. The amendment was defeated by 344 votes to 185. The amendment, tabled by opposition parties, sought to modify the government's proposed tax measures as set out in the Bill. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the SNP, the DUP, Plaid Cymru, and most Reform UK members voted in favour.

Why it matters: The Finance (No. 2) Bill implements a package of tax changes for the 2026-27 tax year and beyond, including a 2 percentage point increase in dividend income tax rates, higher taxes on property income, and the continued freeze of income tax thresholds. These measures collectively raise significant revenue for public services but also draw substantial criticism for the effects of fiscal drag, meaning that frozen thresholds push more taxpayers into higher rate bands without any change to the rates themselves. The defeat of this amendment confirms that the government's preferred approach to these tax measures will proceed unamended. The measures affect landlords, savers, dividend recipients, and, through fiscal drag, a large share of ordinary income taxpayers.

The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines, with Labour and its Co-operative allies voting as a bloc to defeat the amendment, and the main opposition parties uniting to support it. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, SNP, DUP, and Plaid Cymru all voted for the amendment, reflecting a broad cross-opposition coalition against the government's fiscal approach rather than any shared alternative policy vision. Two Reform UK members supported the amendment while six were absent, suggesting limited engagement from that party. This vote sits within a wider pattern of the government defending its autumn 2024 and 2025 Budget decisions against sustained opposition criticism, a pattern also visible in related votes on National Insurance contributions in March 2026, where the government similarly defeated opposition and Lords challenges to its fiscal agenda.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/303 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
94 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
64 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/35 No
Scottish National PartyWhipped Aye
9 Aye/0 No
Independent
4 Aye/4 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Reform UK
2 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and Wales
0 Aye/2 No
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Gareth Davies

Conservative · Grantham and Bourne

Opposed

Bill represents broken manifesto promises and a 'war on landlords,' savers, and small businesses; threshold freeze and asset income tax hikes total £23 billion and will harm ordinary working people and enterprise culture.

Voted Aye

Daisy Cooper

Liberal Democrat · St Albans

Opposed

Tax changes add unwarranted complexity, burden small businesses, risk unintended rental market consequences, and strain HMRC resources; impact assessments essential before implementation.

Voted Aye

Kit Malthouse

Conservative · North West Hampshire

Opposed

Changes overtax risk and enterprise, destroying incentive culture; dividend taxation contradicts government's own growth objectives and continues damaging trend of taxing return on investment.

Voted Aye

Jim Shannon

DUP · Strangford

Opposed

Tax changes hit lower and middle-income families unfairly; 4.8 million more individuals will pay higher rate and 600,000 will enter additional rate, while millionaires can afford it.

Voted Aye

Sir Julian Lewis

Conservative · New Forest East

Neutral

Government claims of fairness contradicted by numerous U-turns since Budget announcement; questions credibility of stated good effects.

Dan Tomlinson

Labour · Chipping Barnet

Supportive

Government measures are fair, necessary, and progressive; they raise revenue from those undertaxed relative to employees while protecting public services and maintaining lowest borrowing levels.

Voted No

Dr Jeevun Sandher

Labour · Loughborough

Supportive

Dividend tax increase is right because wealth taxation has not kept pace with economic change; comparative evidence from France shows it encourages reinvestment and is easily implementable.

Voted No

Related Votes