Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: Amendment 3
185Ayes
344Noes
Defeated · majority 159 · Government won119 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 185 · No 344 · DNV 119 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 12 January 2026, the House of Commons, sitting as a Committee of the whole House, voted on Amendment 3 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill. The amendment was defeated by 344 votes to 185. The amendment, tabled by opposition parties, sought to modify the government's proposed tax measures as set out in the Bill. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the SNP, the DUP, Plaid Cymru, and most Reform UK members voted in favour. The Finance (No. 2) Bill implements a package of tax changes for the 2026-27 tax year and beyond, including a 2 percentage point increase in dividend income tax rates, higher taxes on property income, and the continued freeze of income tax thresholds. These measures collectively raise significant revenue for public services but also draw substantial criticism for the effects of fiscal drag, meaning that frozen thresholds push more taxpayers into higher rate bands without any change to the rates themselves. The defeat of this amendment confirms that the government's preferred approach to these tax measures will proceed unamended. The measures affect landlords, savers, dividend recipients, and, through fiscal drag, a large share of ordinary income taxpayers. The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines, with Labour and its Co-operative allies voting as a bloc to defeat the amendment, and the main opposition parties uniting to support it. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, SNP, DUP, and Plaid Cymru all voted for the amendment, reflecting a broad cross-opposition coalition against the government's fiscal approach rather than any shared alternative policy vision. Two Reform UK members supported the amendment while six were absent, suggesting limited engagement from that party. This vote sits within a wider pattern of the government defending its autumn 2024 and 2025 Budget decisions against sustained opposition criticism, a pattern also visible in related votes on National Insurance contributions in March 2026, where the government similarly defeated opposition and Lords challenges to its fiscal agenda.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring HMRC to proactively inform people when frozen tax thresholds cause them to start paying income tax or move into a higher rate band, increasing transparency around the stealth tax effect.
Voting No meant
Oppose the notification requirement, either accepting the current system without such obligations or viewing the amendment as unnecessary given existing communications — effectively defending the government's continued threshold freeze policy.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
302
59
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
—
4
5
4
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
9
0
0
Reform UK
—
2
0
6
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
—
0
2
2
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
1
0
0
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government measures are fair, necessary, and progressive; they raise revenue from those undertaxed relative to employees while protecting public services and maintaining lowest borrowing levels.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (11,197 words) →
Bill represents broken manifesto promises and a 'war on landlords,' savers, and small businesses; threshold freeze and asset income tax hikes total £23 billion and will harm ordinary working people and enterprise culture.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,456 words) →
Dividend tax increase is right because wealth taxation has not kept pace with economic change; comparative evidence from France shows it encourages reinvestment and is easily implementable.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,788 words) →
Tax changes add unwarranted complexity, burden small businesses, risk unintended rental market consequences, and strain HMRC resources; impact assessments essential before implementation.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,593 words) →
Changes overtax risk and enterprise, destroying incentive culture; dividend taxation contradicts government's own growth objectives and continues damaging trend of taxing return on investment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (292 words) →
Tax changes hit lower and middle-income families unfairly; 4.8 million more individuals will pay higher rate and 600,000 will enter additional rate, while millionaires can afford it.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (505 words) →
Government claims of fairness contradicted by numerous U-turns since Budget announcement; questions credibility of stated good effects.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (53 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0