Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 12

Monday, 12 January 2026 · Division No. 398 · Commons

167Ayes
350Noes
Defeated

128 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedAnti Landlord Tax Increase(Yes)Pro Fiscal Transparency(Yes)Pro Property Income Taxation(No)Anti Tax Scrutiny Requirements(No)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring the government to assess whether tax increases on landlords raise rents, implying scepticism about the policy's impact on tenants

Voting No means

Oppose the review requirement, backing the government's tax changes on property income without mandating an impact assessment on rents

What happened: On 12 January 2026, the House of Commons, sitting as a Committee of the whole House, voted on whether to add New Clause 12 to the Finance (No. 2) Bill. New Clause 12 was tabled by the official Opposition as an amendment to the government's Finance Bill, and would have altered the tax provisions in the legislation. The motion was defeated by 350 votes to 167.

Why it matters: The Finance (No. 2) Bill legislates for a range of tax changes including increases to dividend income tax rates, increases to savings and property income tax rates, and the continued freezing of income tax thresholds. New Clause 12, along with related amendments tabled by the Conservatives, sought to amend or scrutinise these measures. Its defeat means the government's tax package advances unchanged through committee scrutiny, keeping in place rising dividend tax rates, frozen thresholds, and the new property income tax bands that critics argue increase the burden on savers, pensioners, landlords and small business owners.

The politics: The vote split almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 341 Labour and Labour-Co-operative Members who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK and the Traditional Unionist Voice all voted in favour. Four Green Party MPs voted with the government. The result reflects the government's comfortable Commons majority, and sits within a broader pattern of the opposition challenging Labour's tax-raising Budget measures, seen also in parallel votes on National Insurance Contributions legislation in March 2026.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/305 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
92 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
60 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/36 No
Independent
2 Aye/5 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Gareth Davies

Conservative · Grantham and Bourne

Opposed

Bill represents broken manifesto promises and a 'war on landlords,' savers, and small businesses; threshold freeze and asset income tax hikes total £23 billion and will harm ordinary working people and enterprise culture.

Voted Aye

Daisy Cooper

Liberal Democrat · St Albans

Opposed

Tax changes add unwarranted complexity, burden small businesses, risk unintended rental market consequences, and strain HMRC resources; impact assessments essential before implementation.

Voted Aye

Kit Malthouse

Conservative · North West Hampshire

Opposed

Changes overtax risk and enterprise, destroying incentive culture; dividend taxation contradicts government's own growth objectives and continues damaging trend of taxing return on investment.

Voted Aye

Jim Shannon

DUP · Strangford

Opposed

Tax changes hit lower and middle-income families unfairly; 4.8 million more individuals will pay higher rate and 600,000 will enter additional rate, while millionaires can afford it.

Voted Aye

Sir Julian Lewis

Conservative · New Forest East

Neutral

Government claims of fairness contradicted by numerous U-turns since Budget announcement; questions credibility of stated good effects.

Voted Aye

Dan Tomlinson

Labour · Chipping Barnet

Supportive

Government measures are fair, necessary, and progressive; they raise revenue from those undertaxed relative to employees while protecting public services and maintaining lowest borrowing levels.

Voted No

Dr Jeevun Sandher

Labour · Loughborough

Supportive

Dividend tax increase is right because wealth taxation has not kept pace with economic change; comparative evidence from France shows it encourages reinvestment and is easily implementable.

Voted No

Related Votes