Tobacco and Vapes Bill Report Stage: Amendment 85
Wednesday, 26 March 2025 · Division No. 154 · Commons
250 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support ringfencing revenues from fixed penalty notices under the Tobacco and Vapes Bill for designated purposes such as enforcement or public health
Voting No means
Oppose ringfencing fixed penalty notice revenues, preferring the general Treasury approach without hypothecated funding
What happened: The House of Commons voted on 26 March 2025 on Amendment 85 to the Tobacco and Vapes Bill during its Report Stage (the detailed scrutiny stage at which MPs can propose changes to a Bill before its final vote). The amendment, which would have weakened the Bill's restrictions on tobacco and vaping products, was defeated by 303 votes to 92. The result means the Bill's existing provisions remained intact.
Why it matters: The Tobacco and Vapes Bill is designed to create what the government describes as a "smokefree generation" by progressively raising the minimum legal age for purchasing tobacco, so that anyone who was 16 or younger in 2025 will never legally be able to buy tobacco products. The Bill also strengthens regulation of vaping products and advertising. By rejecting this amendment, the Commons preserved those stronger public health protections. The vote is part of a series of decisions taken on the same day that together kept the Bill in its more stringent form, ahead of a Third Reading vote that passed comfortably by 366 to 41.
The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 267 Labour MPs and all 31 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, as did the Greens and the Ulster Unionist. Eighty-three Conservatives voted in favour of weakening the Bill, alongside five Reform UK members, two Democratic Unionist Party members, one Traditional Unionist Voice member and three independents. No Conservative voted against the amendment, and no government-party MP voted for it. The division sits within a broader debate in which the Conservatives had actually introduced a similar Bill in the previous Parliament; the opposition to this version centred less on the principle of reducing smoking and more on concerns about regulatory burden, the growth of illegal tobacco markets, and personal liberty arguments articulated most prominently by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Sleaford and North Hykeham
Supports tobacco control but opposes the Bill's broad powers allowing the Secretary of State to designate smoke-free places without consultation or justified public health grounds; advocates for restricted powers, mandatory pre-implementation licensing consultation, and annual reports on illegal tobacco markets.
Voted Aye
Conservative · Bridgwater
Warns that the generational smoking ban will inevitably increase the illegal tobacco market, a highly regrettable unintended consequence that requires monitoring and enforcement action.
Voted Aye
Conservative · Windsor
Argues the black market already exists significantly (44% drop in duty-paid cigarettes despite only 0.5% reduction in smoking) and the Bill increases that risk, so evidence-gathering via amendment 19 is essential.
Voted Aye
Labour · Maidenhead
Seeks confirmation that fixed penalty notice fines will be retained by local authorities for public health spending to offset enforcement costs.
Conservative · South Holland and The Deepings
Emphasises that illegal tobacco sales are linked to serious organised crime and money laundering, often by foreign-owned shops, and urges stronger support for trading standards and police enforcement.
Voted Aye
Labour · West Lancashire
Defends the Bill as watershed public health legislation that will save lives by ending tobacco sales to future generations, strengthen vaping restrictions for children, and support adult smokers via stop-smoking services and vape-as-quit-aid schemes.
Voted No
Labour · Birmingham Edgbaston
Welcomes the Bill as world-leading public health legislation that will reduce smoking prevalence and protect NHS resources from being overwhelmed by preventable tobacco-related illness.
Voted No