A divisionDivision No. 151 · Wednesday, 26 March 2025· Commons· Health

Tobacco and Vapes Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2

137Ayes
304Noes
Defeated · majority 167 · Government won
207 did not vote
Aye138No303DID NOT VOTE · 207

648 Members · Aye 137 · No 304 · DNV 207 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 26 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 2 during the Report Stage of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill. The new clause, which sought to add additional public health measures beyond those already contained in the government's legislation, was defeated by 304 votes to 137. Report Stage is the point in a bill's passage where MPs can propose amendments and new clauses to modify the legislation before it proceeds to a final vote. The Tobacco and Vapes Bill is designed to create a so-called smokefree generation by progressively raising the minimum legal age for purchasing tobacco, meaning that anyone aged 16 or under in 2025 will never legally be able to buy tobacco products. New Clause 2 would have extended or strengthened the public health protections in the bill beyond what the government proposed. Its defeat means the legislation continues in the form the government prefers, without the additional measures the clause would have introduced. The bill passed its Third Reading on the same day by 366 votes to 41, confirming it will proceed to the House of Lords. The vote produced a sharply divided pattern. Labour MPs voted almost unanimously against the new clause, with only one Labour MP supporting it and 271 voting no, reflecting the government's settled position. Meanwhile, Conservative MPs backed the clause 62 to zero, and Liberal Democrats voted 60 to zero in favour, forming a cross-party opposition alliance that was nonetheless outnumbered by the government's majority. Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, and smaller unionist parties also supported the new clause. The result illustrates that while the bill itself attracted broad cross-party support at Third Reading, disputes over its precise scope and the extent of additional measures generated significant opposition to the government from across the chamber.

Voting Aye meant
Support banning plastic cigarette filters to reduce plastic pollution in waterways and marine environments
Voting No meant
Oppose adding a plastic filter ban to this Bill, likely preferring to address it through separate environmental legislation or rejecting the amendment as outside the Bill's public health scope
§ 01Who voted how.441 voting Members · 207 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
271
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
62
0
54
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
3
1
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Ashley DaltonSupportiveWest Lancashire
Defends the Bill as watershed public health legislation that will save lives by ending tobacco sales to future generations, strengthen vaping restrictions for children, and support adult smokers via stop-smoking services and vape-as-quit-aid schemes.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,874 words)
Dr Caroline JohnsonOpposedSleaford and North Hykeham
Supports tobacco control but opposes the Bill's broad powers allowing the Secretary of State to designate smoke-free places without consultation or justified public health grounds; advocates for restricted powers, mandatory pre-implementation licensing consultation, and annual reports on illegal tobacco markets.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,907 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Warns that the generational smoking ban will inevitably increase the illegal tobacco market, a highly regrettable unintended consequence that requires monitoring and enforcement action.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (47 words)
Sir John HayesNeutralSouth Holland and The Deepings
Emphasises that illegal tobacco sales are linked to serious organised crime and money laundering, often by foreign-owned shops, and urges stronger support for trading standards and police enforcement.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,565 words)
Jack RankinOpposedWindsor
Argues the black market already exists significantly (44% drop in duty-paid cigarettes despite only 0.5% reduction in smoking) and the Bill increases that risk, so evidence-gathering via amendment 19 is essential.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,627 words)
Mr Joshua ReynoldsQuestioningMaidenhead
Seeks confirmation that fixed penalty notice fines will be retained by local authorities for public health spending to offset enforcement costs.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (65 words)
Preet Kaur GillSupportiveBirmingham Edgbaston
Welcomes the Bill as world-leading public health legislation that will reduce smoking prevalence and protect NHS resources from being overwhelmed by preventable tobacco-related illness.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,625 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0