Tobacco and Vapes Bill Report Stage: New Clause 2

Wednesday, 26 March 2025 · Division No. 151 · Commons

137Ayes
304Noes
Defeated

207 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment defeatedPro Environment(Yes)Anti Plastic Pollution(Yes)Pro Regulatory Expansion(Yes)Marine Conservation(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support banning plastic cigarette filters to reduce plastic pollution in waterways and marine environments

Voting No means

Oppose adding a plastic filter ban to this Bill, likely preferring to address it through separate environmental legislation or rejecting the amendment as outside the Bill's public health scope

What happened

On 26 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 2 during the Report Stage of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill. The new clause, which sought to add additional public health measures beyond those already contained in the government's legislation, was defeated by 304 votes to 137. Report Stage is the point in a bill's passage where MPs can propose amendments and new clauses to modify the legislation before it proceeds to a final vote.

Why it matters

The Tobacco and Vapes Bill is designed to create a so-called smokefree generation by progressively raising the minimum legal age for purchasing tobacco, meaning that anyone aged 16 or under in 2025 will never legally be able to buy tobacco products. New Clause 2 would have extended or strengthened the public health protections in the bill beyond what the government proposed. Its defeat means the legislation continues in the form the government prefers, without the additional measures the clause would have introduced. The bill passed its Third Reading on the same day by 366 votes to 41, confirming it will proceed to the House of Lords.

The politics

The vote produced a sharply divided pattern. Labour MPs voted almost unanimously against the new clause, with only one Labour MP supporting it and 271 voting no, reflecting the government's settled position. Meanwhile, Conservative MPs backed the clause 62 to zero, and Liberal Democrats voted 60 to zero in favour, forming a cross-party opposition alliance that was nonetheless outnumbered by the government's majority. Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, and smaller unionist parties also supported the new clause. The result illustrates that while the bill itself attracted broad cross-party support at Third Reading, disputes over its precise scope and the extent of additional measures generated significant opposition to the government from across the chamber.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
1 Aye/271 No

1 rebel: Mary Glindon

Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
62 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
60 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Independent
4 Aye/1 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist Party
2 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No

1 MP voted against their party whip

What They Said in the Debate

Dr Caroline Johnson

Conservative · Sleaford and North Hykeham

Opposed

Supports tobacco control but opposes the Bill's broad powers allowing the Secretary of State to designate smoke-free places without consultation or justified public health grounds; advocates for restricted powers, mandatory pre-implementation licensing consultation, and annual reports on illegal tobacco markets.

Voted Aye

Sir Ashley Fox

Conservative · Bridgwater

Opposed

Warns that the generational smoking ban will inevitably increase the illegal tobacco market, a highly regrettable unintended consequence that requires monitoring and enforcement action.

Voted Aye

Jack Rankin

Conservative · Windsor

Opposed

Argues the black market already exists significantly (44% drop in duty-paid cigarettes despite only 0.5% reduction in smoking) and the Bill increases that risk, so evidence-gathering via amendment 19 is essential.

Voted Aye

Mr Joshua Reynolds

Labour · Maidenhead

Questioning

Seeks confirmation that fixed penalty notice fines will be retained by local authorities for public health spending to offset enforcement costs.

Voted Aye

Sir John Hayes

Conservative · South Holland and The Deepings

Neutral

Emphasises that illegal tobacco sales are linked to serious organised crime and money laundering, often by foreign-owned shops, and urges stronger support for trading standards and police enforcement.

Voted Aye

Ashley Dalton

Labour · West Lancashire

Supportive

Defends the Bill as watershed public health legislation that will save lives by ending tobacco sales to future generations, strengthen vaping restrictions for children, and support adult smokers via stop-smoking services and vape-as-quit-aid schemes.

Voted No

Preet Kaur Gill

Labour · Birmingham Edgbaston

Supportive

Welcomes the Bill as world-leading public health legislation that will reduce smoking prevalence and protect NHS resources from being overwhelmed by preventable tobacco-related illness.

Voted No

Related Votes