A divisionDivision No. 153 · Wednesday, 26 March 2025· Commons· Health

Tobacco and Vapes Bill Report Stage: Amendment 1

72Ayes
304Noes
Defeated · majority 232 · Government won
275 did not vote
Aye72No301DID NOT VOTE · 275

651 Members · Aye 72 · No 304 · DNV 275 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 26 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 1 to the Tobacco and Vapes Bill at Report Stage. The amendment, tabled by Liberal Democrat MP Helen Morgan and colleagues, would have required that money raised from fixed penalty notices issued under the Bill be retained by local authorities and directed toward public health initiatives. The amendment was defeated by 304 votes to 72. The Tobacco and Vapes Bill is designed to create a "smokefree generation" by progressively raising the legal age of tobacco purchase, meaning a person aged 16 in 2025 would never legally be sold tobacco products. Fixed penalty notices are one of the enforcement mechanisms in the Bill, issued to retailers who breach its provisions. The amendment sought to ensure that fine revenue flowed back to local authorities to fund public health work, rather than going to central government. Its defeat means the existing arrangements, under which some fine income can be retained to make enforcement cost-neutral for local authorities, remain unchanged rather than being expanded into a broader local public health funding stream. The Liberal Democrats voted overwhelmingly in favour of the amendment, providing 60 of the 72 aye votes. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against, reflecting the government's position. A small number of Conservatives (4), Plaid Cymru members (3), and Green Party members (3) also voted aye. The broader debate on the Bill showed cross-party support for the core legislation, with Conservatives noting their own party had introduced a similar Bill in the previous Parliament. The Bill passed its Third Reading on the same day by 366 votes to 41, underscoring the wide parliamentary consensus on the underlying policy even as individual amendments were contested.

Voting Aye meant
Support allowing local authorities to keep fixed penalty notice income to fund public health and trading standards enforcement locally
Voting No meant
Oppose ring-fencing fixed penalty notice revenue for local authorities, preferring current central arrangements
§ 01Who voted how.376 voting Members · 275 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
268
93
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
112
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
30
12
Independent
1
1
11
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Ashley DaltonSupportiveWest Lancashire
Defends the Bill as watershed public health legislation that will save lives by ending tobacco sales to future generations, strengthen vaping restrictions for children, and support adult smokers via stop-smoking services and vape-as-quit-aid schemes.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,874 words)
Dr Caroline JohnsonOpposedSleaford and North Hykeham
Supports tobacco control but opposes the Bill's broad powers allowing the Secretary of State to designate smoke-free places without consultation or justified public health grounds; advocates for restricted powers, mandatory pre-implementation licensing consultation, and annual reports on illegal tobacco markets.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,907 words)
Sir Ashley FoxOpposedBridgwater
Warns that the generational smoking ban will inevitably increase the illegal tobacco market, a highly regrettable unintended consequence that requires monitoring and enforcement action.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (47 words)
Sir John HayesNeutralSouth Holland and The Deepings
Emphasises that illegal tobacco sales are linked to serious organised crime and money laundering, often by foreign-owned shops, and urges stronger support for trading standards and police enforcement.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,565 words)
Jack RankinOpposedWindsor
Argues the black market already exists significantly (44% drop in duty-paid cigarettes despite only 0.5% reduction in smoking) and the Bill increases that risk, so evidence-gathering via amendment 19 is essential.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,627 words)
Mr Joshua ReynoldsQuestioningMaidenhead
Seeks confirmation that fixed penalty notice fines will be retained by local authorities for public health spending to offset enforcement costs.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (65 words)
Preet Kaur GillSupportiveBirmingham Edgbaston
Welcomes the Bill as world-leading public health legislation that will reduce smoking prevalence and protect NHS resources from being overwhelmed by preventable tobacco-related illness.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,625 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0