Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Second Reading

Monday, 24 March 2025 · Division No. 139 · Commons

330Ayes
74Noes
Passed

241 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment wonPro Housebuilding(Yes)Pro Planning Reform(Yes)Pro Local Consultation(No)Pro Infrastructure Investment(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, backing a major overhaul of the planning system to accelerate housebuilding and infrastructure delivery

Voting No means

Oppose the Bill, with concerns including insufficient local consultation, inadequate powers to force developers to build on existing permissions, or the overall approach to planning reform

Parliament voted on 24 March 2025 to give the Planning and Infrastructure Bill its Second Reading, passing the measure by 330 votes to 74. A Second Reading is the first substantive vote on a bill in the Commons, approving its general principles before it moves to detailed scrutiny. The bill passed comfortably, with the government's majority delivering a clear win. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour, while the Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of opposition with 64 votes against.

The bill sets out to transform England's planning system, with the government's stated goal of building 1.5 million homes during this Parliament and fast-tracking 150 major infrastructure projects. It would streamline how planning decisions are made, reform how legal challenges to major projects can be brought, and introduce a new approach to environmental obligations intended to replace the existing nutrient neutrality rules that ministers say have blocked thousands of homes. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner also announced on the day of the debate a further £2 billion for affordable housing and £600 million for construction skills training, including 60,000 new apprenticeships.

The most notable feature of the division was the Liberal Democrats voting unanimously against, positioning themselves as defenders of local planning controls and community consultation rather than supporting the government's top-line housing ambitions. The Conservatives, while offering partial support for the bill's principles, did not vote as a bloc against it, with their shadow housing spokesman Kevin Hollinrake indicating conditional backing for its aims alongside significant reservations. Plaid Cymru and the Democratic Unionist Party also voted against. The Greens, notably, voted in favour. The bill subsequently progressed through Report Stage and passed its Third Reading on 10 June 2025 by 306 votes to 174, with opposition growing as the legislation was amended.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
290 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/64 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
36 Aye/0 No
Independent
1 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist Party
0 Aye/2 No
Reform UK
0 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

What They Said in the Debate

Kevin Hollinrake

Conservative · Thirsk and Malton

Opposed

While supporting some principles, the Bill's 1.5m target is undeliverable; removing councillor powers is anti-democratic; housing targets unfairly shift burden to rural areas; concerns about environmental protections and lack of investment in skills.

Mark Pritchard

Conservative · The Wrekin

Opposed

Constituents want homes but demand proper consultation, right location and scale; objects to ignoring local views through mandatory local plans.

Sir Roger Gale

Conservative · Herne Bay and Sandwich

Opposed

Supports speedier planning but warns against removing right to object to major projects; cites National Grid Sea Link converter station as example of legitimate public concern.

Gideon Amos

Liberal Democrat · Taunton and Wellington

Questioning

Welcomes compulsory purchase reforms and nature restoration fund, but criticises Henry VIII clauses and removal of community voice; argues councillors approve 85-90% of applications and are not the blocker; advocates community-led development.

Voted No

Andy Slaughter

Labour · Hammersmith and Chiswick

Questioning

Welcomes affordable housing expansion but raises concern that Gypsies and Travellers have been systematically discriminated against and excluded from planning provisions.

Voted Aye

John McDonnell

Labour · Hayes and Harlington

Questioning

Seeks clarification on Heathrow expansion process and expresses concern about removing compulsory purchase consultees from pre-application stage.

Voted Aye

Angela Rayner

Labour · Ashton-under-Lyne

Supportive

Bill is essential to get Britain building again; transforms planning to deliver 1.5m homes and infrastructure while protecting communities and nature through better consultation and streamlined processes.

Voted Aye

Chris Hinchliff

Labour · North East Hertfordshire

Supportive

Bill offers opportunity to reform planning after Conservative mismanagement; advocates stronger council housing programmes, land value capture, and environmental limits on growth.

Voted Aye

Related Votes