A divisionDivision No. 217 · Monday, 9 June 2025· Commons· Planning

Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 15

73Ayes
323Noes
Defeated · majority 250 · Government won
251 did not vote
Aye76No322DID NOT VOTE · 251

647 Members · Aye 73 · No 323 · DNV 251 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament rejected a Liberal Democrat amendment to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill on 9 June 2025, by 323 votes to 73. Amendment 15, tabled by Lib Dem MPs, would have written into the legislation a statutory target of 150,000 new social homes built per year, backed by an additional £6 billion in annual public funding on top of existing affordable housing programmes and section 106 developer contributions. The amendment would have made the social housing target legally binding, requiring a specific and substantial increase in public spending to deliver it. The Centre for Economics and Business Research, cited by Lib Dem MP Gideon Amos during the debate, assessed that the funding level proposed would be sufficient to reach 150,000 social homes per year by the end of the Parliament. Without such a provision, the Planning and Infrastructure Bill contains no binding annual figure for social housing delivery. All 318 Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment. The 73 votes in favour came almost entirely from the Liberal Democrats, with 56 of their MPs backing it. The four Green MPs, four Reform UK MPs, and a handful of smaller party and independent MPs also voted for it. Only one Conservative MP voted in favour, while 115 Conservatives had no vote recorded. The result was never in doubt given the size of the Labour majority, though the vote allowed the Lib Dems to place their social housing target formally on the parliamentary record.

Voting Aye meant
Support a statutory target of 150,000 new social homes per year, backed by significant additional public investment, to address the social housing crisis.
Voting No meant
Oppose the Liberal Democrat social housing target, either rejecting the funding mechanism or preferring the government's existing approach to affordable housing delivery without a binding annual figure.
§ 01Who voted how.396 voting Members · 251 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
284
77
Conservative and Unionist Party
1
0
115
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
56
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
34
8
Independent
6
4
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Matthew PennycookSupportiveGreenwich and Woolwich
Moving New Clause 69 to require examiners of development consent applications to take procedural decisions in light of initial assessments under the Planning Act 2008.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (7,052 words)
Nusrat GhaniOpposedSussex Weald
Tabling 92 new clauses that substantially expand planning protections for the environment, biodiversity, affordable housing, and agricultural land, and introduce stricter controls on developers and second homes.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (24,946 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0