Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 43
Monday, 9 June 2025 · Division No. 216 · Commons
146 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support giving villages statutory protection from overdevelopment, preserving their rural identity and preventing them from merging with neighbouring settlements
Voting No means
Oppose adding village protection clauses to the Bill, prioritising housing delivery targets over local character and resisting restrictions that could limit new home building
What happened: Parliament voted on New Clause 43 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill during its Report Stage on 9 June 2025. The new clause concerned compulsory purchase order (CPO) compensation arrangements, specifically seeking to strengthen protections for landowners and occupiers facing compulsory acquisition. The motion was defeated by 334 votes to 167.
Why it matters: The Planning and Infrastructure Bill is a major piece of legislation designed to accelerate housing delivery and infrastructure development across England. New Clause 43 touched on the compensation framework under which people can be forced to give up their land or homes through CPO powers. Its defeat means the existing compensation arrangements remain in place, and the additional protections sought for farmers, homeowners and business owners facing compulsory acquisition were not added to the Bill. The outcome reinforces the government's preference for a streamlined planning system centred on national targets and development speed rather than enhanced individual compensation rights.
The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 328 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the new clause, while Conservatives (95), Liberal Democrats (55), Reform UK (6), most independents (8), and the Democratic Unionist Party (2) all voted in favour. There were no rebels on either side. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, despite differing on many issues, united in opposing what they characterised as excessive centralisation and inadequate community and environmental protections in the Bill. The government went on to pass the Bill at Third Reading the following day, 306 to 174, with opposition parties continuing to argue the legislation failed rural communities, farmers and environmental standards.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Conservatives · Hamble Valley
Bill represents over-centralisation by Minister and Deputy PM; opposes most new clauses as they extend CPO powers; calls for improved compensation (New Clause 85) and fairness to farmers and landowners
Voted Aye
Labour · Northampton South
Supports development corporation powers as critical for delivery but warns against forcing behaviour change through CPOs; emphasis needed on working with communities and sustainability
Voted No
Liberal Democrats · Henley and Thame
New Clause 22 should require statutory guidance on using CPOs for active travel routes to match existing CPO use for roads, citing Welsh precedent and evidence that current guidance is insufficient
Liberal Democrats · Taunton and Wellington
Supports amendments 88/89 on recreational land and New Clause 107 on public land disposal; opposes New Clause 85 as it would double-pay landowners and reduce council housing; backs community-led infrastructure approach
Voted Aye
Conservative · North East Hertfordshire
Amendment 68 would allow councils to acquire land at current use value without hope value to deliver council homes; argues developer-led model has failed to produce affordable housing despite high supply
Voted No
Conservative · Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
New Clause 128 should establish community benefit scheme requiring 20% of CPO value paid into local community funds; CPO powers need stronger checks and balances to protect rural communities from industrial energy infrastructure
Voted Aye
Liberal Democrats · Twickenham
Amendments 88/89 should extend hope value disregard to recreational facilities; New Clause 107 should allow discounted disposal of public land for public good purposes
Voted Aye
Labour · North Northumberland
Bill addresses false dichotomy between development and nature; smaller 'little and often' developments vital for rural communities; supports streamlining to enable local projects like affordable housing for school retention
Voted No
Related Votes
Opposition day: Property taxes
3 Sept 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 85
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 114
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Third Reading
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 15
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 69
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Second Reading
24 Mar 2025