A divisionDivision No. 216 · Monday, 9 June 2025· Commons· Planning

Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 43

167Ayes
334Noes
Defeated · majority 167 · Government won
146 did not vote
Aye168No335DID NOT VOTE · 146

647 Members · Aye 167 · No 334 · DNV 146 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on New Clause 43 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill during its Report Stage on 9 June 2025. The new clause concerned compulsory purchase order (CPO) compensation arrangements, specifically seeking to strengthen protections for landowners and occupiers facing compulsory acquisition. The motion was defeated by 334 votes to 167. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill is a major piece of legislation designed to accelerate housing delivery and infrastructure development across England. New Clause 43 touched on the compensation framework under which people can be forced to give up their land or homes through CPO powers. Its defeat means the existing compensation arrangements remain in place, and the additional protections sought for farmers, homeowners and business owners facing compulsory acquisition were not added to the Bill. The outcome reinforces the government's preference for a streamlined planning system centred on national targets and development speed rather than enhanced individual compensation rights. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 328 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the new clause, while Conservatives (95), Liberal Democrats (55), Reform UK (6), most independents (8), and the Democratic Unionist Party (2) all voted in favour. There were no rebels on either side. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, despite differing on many issues, united in opposing what they characterised as excessive centralisation and inadequate community and environmental protections in the Bill. The government went on to pass the Bill at Third Reading the following day, 306 to 174, with opposition parties continuing to argue the legislation failed rural communities, farmers and environmental standards.

Voting Aye meant
Support giving villages statutory protection from overdevelopment, preserving their rural identity and preventing them from merging with neighbouring settlements
Voting No meant
Oppose adding village protection clauses to the Bill, prioritising housing delivery targets over local character and resisting restrictions that could limit new home building
§ 01Who voted how.501 voting Members · 146 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
292
69
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
55
0
17
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
8
4
1
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Matthew PennycookSupportiveGreenwich and Woolwich
Moving New Clause 69 to require examiners of development consent applications to take procedural decisions in light of initial assessments under the Planning Act 2008.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,052 words)
Nusrat GhaniOpposedSussex Weald
Tabling 92 new clauses that substantially expand planning protections for the environment, biodiversity, affordable housing, and agricultural land, and introduce stricter controls on developers and second homes.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (24,946 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0