A divisionDivision No. 216 · Monday, 9 June 2025· Commons· Planning

Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 43

167Ayes
334Noes
Defeated · majority 167 · Government won
146 did not vote
Aye168No335DID NOT VOTE · 146

647 Members · Aye 167 · No 334 · DNV 146 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 9 June 2025 on New Clause 43 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, a Conservative-tabled amendment that would have required the Secretary of State to issue or update planning guidance giving villages equivalent protections to those currently afforded to towns under the National Planning Policy Framework. The clause was defeated by 334 votes to 167. The practical effect of the amendment would have been to direct government planning guidance toward preserving the character, identity and rural fabric of villages by guarding against neighbouring developments absorbing them, maintaining green buffers between settlements, and protecting their historic character. Supporters argued that existing planning policy leaves villages without equivalent safeguards to those towns enjoy, leaving rural communities exposed to what they described as unchecked sprawl and settlement merging. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 292 voting Labour MPs and 35 Labour and Co-operative MPs opposed the clause. Conservatives (95 votes), Liberal Democrats (55 votes), and Reform UK (6 votes) all voted in favour, joined by 7 independents and 2 Democratic Unionist Party MPs. The Greens voted against. The defeat fits a pattern across the Bill's report stage, in which government-opposed Conservative amendments were consistently voted down by Labour's Commons majority.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring the government to extend to villages the same planning protections towns enjoy, guarding against urban sprawl, settlement merging, and loss of rural character.
Voting No meant
Oppose adding this requirement to the Bill, arguing it could restrict housebuilding targets or that existing planning policy is sufficient to protect rural communities.
§ 01Who voted how.501 voting Members · 146 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
292
69
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
55
0
16
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
7
4
2
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Matthew PennycookSupportiveGreenwich and Woolwich
Moving New Clause 69 to require examiners of development consent applications to take procedural decisions in light of initial assessments under the Planning Act 2008.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,052 words)
Nusrat GhaniOpposedSussex Weald
Tabling 92 new clauses that substantially expand planning protections for the environment, biodiversity, affordable housing, and agricultural land, and introduce stricter controls on developers and second homes.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (24,946 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0