Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39

Monday, 9 June 2025 · Division No. 215 · Commons

113Ayes
335Noes
Defeated

197 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedPro Food Security(Yes)Pro Agricultural Land Protection(Yes)Pro Renewable Energy Deployment(No)Anti Solar On Farmland(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support prohibiting solar farms on the best agricultural land to protect food security and farmland from irreversible development

Voting No means

Oppose the blanket ban, arguing existing protections are sufficient and that restricting solar on agricultural land would hinder renewable energy targets

What happened: Parliament voted on New Clause 39 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill during its Report Stage on 9 June 2025. The clause, tabled by the Conservative opposition, concerned compulsory purchase order (CPO) compensation arrangements, seeking stronger protections and fairer payments for those whose land or property is acquired by the state. The government and its Labour and Labour and Co-operative members voted against it, and the clause was defeated by 335 votes to 113.

Why it matters: Compulsory purchase orders allow public bodies to acquire land and property without the owner's consent, typically for infrastructure, housing, or regeneration projects. New Clause 39 sought to strengthen the financial and procedural protections available to those subjected to such orders. Its defeat means the Bill proceeds without those additional safeguards, leaving the existing CPO compensation framework broadly unchanged for now. Farming communities, rural landowners, and homeowners facing displacement were among those whose representatives argued they would be left exposed by the Bill's current provisions.

The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 293 voting Labour members and all 35 Labour and Co-operative members opposed the clause, while 95 Conservatives backed it. Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice also voted in favour, producing a cross-party grouping of opposition parties united against the government's position. The Greens, unusually, voted with the government against the clause. The debate formed part of a broader pattern in which the government rejected a series of Conservative and cross-party amendments across the Report Stage, with opposition members arguing that the government's refusal to accept any substantive changes had missed an opportunity to improve the legislation before it passes to the House of Lords.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/293 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
95 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/35 No
Independent
8 Aye/3 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
6 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Democratic Unionist Party
2 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Paul Holmes

Conservatives · Hamble Valley

Opposed

Bill represents over-centralisation by Minister and Deputy PM; opposes most new clauses as they extend CPO powers; calls for improved compensation (New Clause 85) and fairness to farmers and landowners

Voted Aye

Mike Reader

Labour · Northampton South

Neutral

Supports development corporation powers as critical for delivery but warns against forcing behaviour change through CPOs; emphasis needed on working with communities and sustainability

Voted No

Freddie van Mierlo

Liberal Democrats · Henley and Thame

Supportive

New Clause 22 should require statutory guidance on using CPOs for active travel routes to match existing CPO use for roads, citing Welsh precedent and evidence that current guidance is insufficient

Gideon Amos

Liberal Democrats · Taunton and Wellington

Supportive

Supports amendments 88/89 on recreational land and New Clause 107 on public land disposal; opposes New Clause 85 as it would double-pay landowners and reduce council housing; backs community-led infrastructure approach

Chris Hinchliff

Conservative · North East Hertfordshire

Supportive

Amendment 68 would allow councils to acquire land at current use value without hope value to deliver council homes; argues developer-led model has failed to produce affordable housing despite high supply

Voted No

John Lamont

Conservative · Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk

Supportive

New Clause 128 should establish community benefit scheme requiring 20% of CPO value paid into local community funds; CPO powers need stronger checks and balances to protect rural communities from industrial energy infrastructure

Voted Aye

Munira Wilson

Liberal Democrats · Twickenham

Supportive

Amendments 88/89 should extend hope value disregard to recreational facilities; New Clause 107 should allow discounted disposal of public land for public good purposes

David Smith

Labour · North Northumberland

Supportive

Bill addresses false dichotomy between development and nature; smaller 'little and often' developments vital for rural communities; supports streamlining to enable local projects like affordable housing for school retention

Voted No

Related Votes

Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39 — Monday, 9 June 2025 | Beyond The Vote