A divisionDivision No. 215 · Monday, 9 June 2025· Commons· Planning

Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39

113Ayes
335Noes
Defeated · majority 222 · Government won
197 did not vote
Aye116No336DID NOT VOTE · 197

645 Members · Aye 113 · No 335 · DNV 197 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament defeated a Conservative-led proposal to ban large-scale solar farm developments on high-quality agricultural land during the Report Stage of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill on 9 June 2025. The vote, Division 215, went 113 in favour and 335 against, rejecting New Clause 39 by a margin of more than three to one. The new clause would have prohibited solar power developments on high-quality agricultural land, a category that broadly corresponds to grades one and two in the government's agricultural land classification system. Supporters argued that protecting this land is essential to national food security, particularly given fragile global supply chains, and that solar projects should instead be directed to brownfield sites, rooftops, and lower-grade land. Opponents argued that existing planning policies already provide sufficient protection and that an outright ban would hamper renewable energy targets. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 95 voting Conservative MPs backed the new clause, as did all six voting Reform UK members, all four Plaid Cymru members, both voting Democratic Unionist Party members, one Traditional Unionist Voice member, and seven Independents. All 292 voting Labour MPs and all 35 Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against, joined by all three voting Greens and one Social Democratic and Labour Party member. No Conservative MPs voted against, and no Labour MPs voted in favour. The defeat fits a broader pattern across Report Stage, where the government's majority consistently saw off Opposition amendments throughout the two days of debate.

Voting Aye meant
Support prohibiting solar power developments on high-quality agricultural land to protect food security and farming
Voting No meant
Oppose the ban, arguing existing planning policies are sufficient and that blocking solar on productive land would undermine renewable energy goals
§ 01Who voted how.448 voting Members · 197 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
292
69
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
7
4
2
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
6
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Matthew PennycookSupportiveGreenwich and Woolwich
Moving New Clause 69 to require examiners of development consent applications to take procedural decisions in light of initial assessments under the Planning Act 2008.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,052 words)
Nusrat GhaniOpposedSussex Weald
Tabling 92 new clauses that substantially expand planning protections for the environment, biodiversity, affordable housing, and agricultural land, and introduce stricter controls on developers and second homes.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (24,946 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0