Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39
Monday, 9 June 2025 · Division No. 215 · Commons
197 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support prohibiting solar farms on the best agricultural land to protect food security and farmland from irreversible development
Voting No means
Oppose the blanket ban, arguing existing protections are sufficient and that restricting solar on agricultural land would hinder renewable energy targets
What happened: Parliament voted on New Clause 39 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill during its Report Stage on 9 June 2025. The clause, tabled by the Conservative opposition, concerned compulsory purchase order (CPO) compensation arrangements, seeking stronger protections and fairer payments for those whose land or property is acquired by the state. The government and its Labour and Labour and Co-operative members voted against it, and the clause was defeated by 335 votes to 113.
Why it matters: Compulsory purchase orders allow public bodies to acquire land and property without the owner's consent, typically for infrastructure, housing, or regeneration projects. New Clause 39 sought to strengthen the financial and procedural protections available to those subjected to such orders. Its defeat means the Bill proceeds without those additional safeguards, leaving the existing CPO compensation framework broadly unchanged for now. Farming communities, rural landowners, and homeowners facing displacement were among those whose representatives argued they would be left exposed by the Bill's current provisions.
The politics: The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 293 voting Labour members and all 35 Labour and Co-operative members opposed the clause, while 95 Conservatives backed it. Reform UK, Plaid Cymru, the Democratic Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice also voted in favour, producing a cross-party grouping of opposition parties united against the government's position. The Greens, unusually, voted with the government against the clause. The debate formed part of a broader pattern in which the government rejected a series of Conservative and cross-party amendments across the Report Stage, with opposition members arguing that the government's refusal to accept any substantive changes had missed an opportunity to improve the legislation before it passes to the House of Lords.
How They Voted
Government position: No
What They Said in the Debate
Conservatives · Hamble Valley
Bill represents over-centralisation by Minister and Deputy PM; opposes most new clauses as they extend CPO powers; calls for improved compensation (New Clause 85) and fairness to farmers and landowners
Voted Aye
Labour · Northampton South
Supports development corporation powers as critical for delivery but warns against forcing behaviour change through CPOs; emphasis needed on working with communities and sustainability
Voted No
Liberal Democrats · Henley and Thame
New Clause 22 should require statutory guidance on using CPOs for active travel routes to match existing CPO use for roads, citing Welsh precedent and evidence that current guidance is insufficient
Liberal Democrats · Taunton and Wellington
Supports amendments 88/89 on recreational land and New Clause 107 on public land disposal; opposes New Clause 85 as it would double-pay landowners and reduce council housing; backs community-led infrastructure approach
Conservative · North East Hertfordshire
Amendment 68 would allow councils to acquire land at current use value without hope value to deliver council homes; argues developer-led model has failed to produce affordable housing despite high supply
Voted No
Conservative · Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
New Clause 128 should establish community benefit scheme requiring 20% of CPO value paid into local community funds; CPO powers need stronger checks and balances to protect rural communities from industrial energy infrastructure
Voted Aye
Liberal Democrats · Twickenham
Amendments 88/89 should extend hope value disregard to recreational facilities; New Clause 107 should allow discounted disposal of public land for public good purposes
Labour · North Northumberland
Bill addresses false dichotomy between development and nature; smaller 'little and often' developments vital for rural communities; supports streamlining to enable local projects like affordable housing for school retention
Voted No
Related Votes
Opposition day: Property taxes
3 Sept 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 85
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 114
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Third Reading
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 43
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 15
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 69
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Second Reading
24 Mar 2025