Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 69
180Ayes
307Noes
Defeated · majority 127 · Government won159 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 180 · No 307 · DNV 159 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 9 June 2025 on Amendment 69 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill at Report Stage. The amendment, tabled by Labour backbencher Chris Hinchliff and backed by 53 MPs, would have strengthened environmental safeguards within the Bill's new Nature Restoration Fund, specifically to address concerns raised by the Office for Environmental Protection. The government opposed it, and the amendment was defeated by 307 votes to 180. The Nature Restoration Fund is a central plank of the Bill, allowing developers to pay a levy to Natural England in lieu of meeting site-by-site environmental obligations, with the proceeds funding conservation measures. Supporters of Amendment 69 argued it was necessary to ensure the fund genuinely delivered for nature rather than weakening existing protections. The government and its allies argued that tightening the environmental requirements around the fund would slow planning approvals, undermining the Bill's core purpose of accelerating housebuilding and major infrastructure delivery. The vote exposed a significant Labour backbench rebellion. Sixteen Labour MPs and one Labour and Co-operative MP voted for the amendment against their government's position. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats voted unanimously for it, as did all four Green MPs, creating a cross-party pro-amendment coalition. Despite this, the government's majority was sufficient to defeat it comfortably. The result reflects wider tensions within the Labour Party over whether the Bill's planning deregulation goes too far in trading away environmental protections for development speed.
Voting Aye meant
Support strengthening environmental protections within the Nature Restoration Fund, ensuring the new system genuinely delivers for nature rather than weakening existing safeguards.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment on the grounds that tightening environmental requirements would slow down planning approvals and undermine the government's housebuilding and infrastructure goals.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
16
267
78
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
92
0
24
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
57
0
14
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
1
33
8
Independent
—
7
4
2
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
2
4
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moving New Clause 69 to require examiners of development consent applications to take procedural decisions in light of initial assessments under the Planning Act 2008.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,052 words) →
Tabling 92 new clauses that substantially expand planning protections for the environment, biodiversity, affordable housing, and agricultural land, and introduce stricter controls on developers and second homes.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (24,946 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0