Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 69
180Ayes
307Noes
Defeated · majority 127 · Government won159 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 180 · No 307 · DNV 159 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 9 June 2025, MPs voted on Amendment 69 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which the full House of Commons reviews and can alter a Bill after it has been examined in committee). The amendment was defeated by 307 votes to 180. The amendment related to compulsory purchase orders (CPOs), development corporations, and associated compensation and land acquisition provisions within the Bill. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill is the Government's flagship legislation to accelerate housebuilding and infrastructure delivery across England. Amendment 69 sat within a cluster of proposals focused on how land is acquired compulsorily for development and what rights and protections landowners, tenants, and communities retain during that process. Its defeat means the Bill's existing compulsory purchase framework, including the balance between developer powers and landowner compensation, remains as the Government drafted it. Those who supported the amendment argued that current arrangements leave landowners, including farmers, with inadequate protections; those who opposed it, including the Government, held that adding further obligations or constraints would slow housing and infrastructure delivery. The vote divided sharply along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour MPs voted overwhelmingly against the amendment (268 No, with only 16 Labour members voting Aye), while Conservatives (92 Aye), Liberal Democrats (57 Aye), and Greens (4 Aye) all voted in favour. The 16 Labour MPs who backed the amendment represent a modest but notable cross-bench moment of dissent within the governing party. The broader debate around this vote was heated, with opposition spokespeople accusing the Government of ignoring constructive cross-party amendments throughout the Bill's passage, while Government supporters argued that opposition amendments were designed to impede development rather than improve it. The Bill subsequently passed its Third Reading on 10 June 2025 by 306 votes to 174, confirming that the Government's version, without the changes proposed by Amendment 69 and several related amendments, will now proceed to the House of Lords.
Voting Aye meant
Support strengthening environmental protections in the planning system, requiring stricter safeguards for habitats and biodiversity before development can proceed
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment, arguing it would entrench a broken system of environmental regulation that blocks necessary development and house-building, and that the Bill's existing framework better balances growth with environmental goals
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
16
267
78
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
92
0
24
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
57
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
1
33
8
Independent
—
8
4
1
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
2
4
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moving New Clause 69 to require examiners of development consent applications to take procedural decisions in light of initial assessments under the Planning Act 2008.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (7,052 words) →
Tabling 92 new clauses that substantially expand planning protections for the environment, biodiversity, affordable housing, and agricultural land, and introduce stricter controls on developers and second homes.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (24,946 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0