Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 69
Monday, 9 June 2025 · Division No. 218 · Commons
159 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support strengthening environmental protections in the planning system, requiring stricter safeguards for habitats and biodiversity before development can proceed
Voting No means
Oppose the amendment, arguing it would entrench a broken system of environmental regulation that blocks necessary development and house-building, and that the Bill's existing framework better balances growth with environmental goals
What happened: On 9 June 2025, MPs voted on Amendment 69 to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which the full House of Commons reviews and can alter a Bill after it has been examined in committee). The amendment was defeated by 307 votes to 180. The amendment related to compulsory purchase orders (CPOs), development corporations, and associated compensation and land acquisition provisions within the Bill.
Why it matters: The Planning and Infrastructure Bill is the Government's flagship legislation to accelerate housebuilding and infrastructure delivery across England. Amendment 69 sat within a cluster of proposals focused on how land is acquired compulsorily for development and what rights and protections landowners, tenants, and communities retain during that process. Its defeat means the Bill's existing compulsory purchase framework, including the balance between developer powers and landowner compensation, remains as the Government drafted it. Those who supported the amendment argued that current arrangements leave landowners, including farmers, with inadequate protections; those who opposed it, including the Government, held that adding further obligations or constraints would slow housing and infrastructure delivery.
The politics: The vote divided sharply along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour MPs voted overwhelmingly against the amendment (268 No, with only 16 Labour members voting Aye), while Conservatives (92 Aye), Liberal Democrats (57 Aye), and Greens (4 Aye) all voted in favour. The 16 Labour MPs who backed the amendment represent a modest but notable cross-bench moment of dissent within the governing party. The broader debate around this vote was heated, with opposition spokespeople accusing the Government of ignoring constructive cross-party amendments throughout the Bill's passage, while Government supporters argued that opposition amendments were designed to impede development rather than improve it. The Bill subsequently passed its Third Reading on 10 June 2025 by 306 votes to 174, confirming that the Government's version, without the changes proposed by Amendment 69 and several related amendments, will now proceed to the House of Lords.
How They Voted
Government position: No
16 rebels: Andy McDonald, Apsana Begum, Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff, Clive Lewis, Ian Byrne, Ian Lavery + 8 more
17 MPs voted against their party whip
What They Said in the Debate
Conservatives · Hamble Valley
Bill represents over-centralisation by Minister and Deputy PM; opposes most new clauses as they extend CPO powers; calls for improved compensation (New Clause 85) and fairness to farmers and landowners
Voted Aye
Labour · Northampton South
Supports development corporation powers as critical for delivery but warns against forcing behaviour change through CPOs; emphasis needed on working with communities and sustainability
Voted No
Liberal Democrats · Henley and Thame
New Clause 22 should require statutory guidance on using CPOs for active travel routes to match existing CPO use for roads, citing Welsh precedent and evidence that current guidance is insufficient
Liberal Democrats · Taunton and Wellington
Supports amendments 88/89 on recreational land and New Clause 107 on public land disposal; opposes New Clause 85 as it would double-pay landowners and reduce council housing; backs community-led infrastructure approach
Voted Aye
Conservative · North East Hertfordshire
Amendment 68 would allow councils to acquire land at current use value without hope value to deliver council homes; argues developer-led model has failed to produce affordable housing despite high supply
Voted Aye
Conservative · Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk
New Clause 128 should establish community benefit scheme requiring 20% of CPO value paid into local community funds; CPO powers need stronger checks and balances to protect rural communities from industrial energy infrastructure
Voted Aye
Liberal Democrats · Twickenham
Amendments 88/89 should extend hope value disregard to recreational facilities; New Clause 107 should allow discounted disposal of public land for public good purposes
Voted Aye
Labour · North Northumberland
Bill addresses false dichotomy between development and nature; smaller 'little and often' developments vital for rural communities; supports streamlining to enable local projects like affordable housing for school retention
Voted No
Related Votes
Opposition day: Property taxes
3 Sept 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 85
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 114
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Third Reading
10 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 39
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: New Clause 43
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill Report Stage: Amendment 15
9 Jun 2025
Planning and Infrastructure Bill: Second Reading
24 Mar 2025