The topic lensIssue · 13 divisions tagged · 13 parties active

Renters.

Private renting, tenant rights, and regulation

TopicRenters
ParentHousing
RelatedPlanning · Social Housing · Homelessness · House Building
Divisions tagged
13
This parliament
Parties active
13
≥1 vote tagged
Most on-whip
Ulster Unionist Party
92% aligned
Recent activity
10
Most-recent divisions
§ 01Where the parties sit on renters.13 divisions · this parliament

Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.

PartyStance vs neutral midpointNet %Discipline
Labour PartyLab
+1161% on-whip · 356 MPs
Conservative and Unionist PartyCon
-1139% on-whip · 113 MPs
Liberal DemocratsLD
+3383% on-whip · 71 MPs
Labour and Co-operative PartyLab
+1262% on-whip · 42 MPs
IndependentInd
+1363% on-whip · 13 MPs
Reform UKRef
-1436% on-whip · 8 MPs
Democratic Unionist PartyDUP
+4191% on-whip · 5 MPs
Green Party of England and WalesGrn
+2575% on-whip · 4 MPs

Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions

§ 02Recent renters divisions.last 5 · of 13 tagged
DateMotionAyeNoCarried
8 Sept 2025Renters’ Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 18
Aye: Support keeping the 12-month no-re-let period after a landlord evicts to sell, maintaining a strong deterrent against bogus possession claims · No: Prefer the Lords' shorter 6-month restricted period, arguing it is less burdensome on landlords who genuinely wish to sell
40399Yes
8 Sept 2025Renters’ Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 39
Aye: Support the government's rejection of the Lords amendment, accepting ministerial assurances and an annual reporting commitment rather than placing statutory Decent Homes Standard protections for service family accommodation on the face of the Bill. · No: Support the Lords amendment requiring military service family accommodation to meet the statutory Decent Homes Standard, arguing service families deserve the same legal protections as private and social renters.
324173Yes
8 Sept 2025Renters’ Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 19
Aye: Support the government's decision to reject the Lords amendment, prioritising tenant protections over special flexibility for shared ownership landlords who sublet their homes. · No: Support the Lords amendment, arguing that shared ownership leaseholders in financial difficulty deserve an exemption from the Bill's restrictions and that rejecting it risks pushing some into financial ruin.
338160Yes
8 Sept 2025Renters’ Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 11
Aye: Support rejecting the Lords amendment, keeping the ban on additional pet deposits and making it easier for renters to keep pets without paying large extra charges upfront · No: Support the Lords amendment allowing landlords to charge a three-week pet deposit, giving landlords greater financial protection against potential damage from pets
39995Yes
8 Sept 2025Renters’ Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 64
Aye: Support removing the Lords amendment, keeping the Bill without a special eviction ground for landlords who need to accommodate a carer — prioritising tenant security over this landlord exemption · No: Support the Lords amendment creating a new possession ground for landlords needing to house a carer, arguing the law should recognise the needs of carers and those who depend on them
336162Yes

All 13 divisions on this issue →

§ 03MPs most aligned, by party.Top-3 most-on-whip per major party

By party, the MPs whose voting record on renters is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.

§ 04Where renters money lands.Council-service mapping pending
Pending — issue-to-service mapping

Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Renters” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.

Sources, methods & last update
Issue taggingEach division is tagged to one or more issues by Claude classification, reviewed by topic admins.
VotingHansard division lists · Commons Votes API
AlignmentShare of party MPs voting with the party majority on tagged divisions
CohortThis parliament · 13 divisions