Local Government.
Council services, local authority funding, and devolved powers
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +9 | 59% on-whip · 360 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -18 | 32% on-whip · 113 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | -7 | 43% on-whip · 71 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +11 | 61% on-whip · 41 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +6 | 56% on-whip · 14 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | -20 | 30% on-whip · 8 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +12 | 62% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Democratic Unionist Party | DUP | -14 | 36% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Jul 2026 | Draft Town and Country Planning (Discharge of Local Planning Authority Functions) (England) Regulations 2026 Aye: Support streamlining planning decisions by removing councillors' ability to block small housing applications, prioritising housebuilding and lower construction costs over local political control. · No: Oppose the regulations as an erosion of local democratic accountability, arguing elected councillors should retain scrutiny over planning applications in their areas regardless of size. | 283 | 181 | Yes |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Draft Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) (Amendment) Order 2026 Aye: Support reintroducing the supplementary vote system for mayoral elections, arguing it gives elected mayors a broader democratic mandate · No: Oppose the change, preferring first past the post as a simpler and more straightforward voting system, and objecting to reversing a previous Conservative reform | 359 | 87 | Yes |
| 27 Apr 2026 | English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendments 89B and 89C Aye: Support the government's rejection of a Lords requirement to prioritise brownfield land for development, trusting existing planning policy to protect greenfield and green-belt sites without a statutory brownfield-first duty. · No: Support the Lords amendments requiring brownfield land to be formally prioritised for housing, arguing this is necessary to prevent developers exploiting new mayoral planning powers to build on greenfield and grey-belt sites. | 273 | 168 | Yes |
| 27 Apr 2026 | English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill: Motion relating to Lords Amendments 94B and 94C Aye: Support the government's position in rejecting Lords amendments 94B and 94C, backing the government's preferred version of the English Devolution Bill as it applies to planning and local governance provisions · No: Back the Lords in their amendments 94B and 94C, opposing the government's approach — reflecting Conservative concerns that the Bill gives ministers excessive centralising powers and fails to adequately protect brownfield-first planning priorities and local democratic choice | 270 | 172 | Yes |
| 27 Apr 2026 | English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill: Motion relating to Lords Amendments 36, 90 and 155 Aye: Support the government's position — reject the Lords amendments and accept the government's alternative provisions, backing Labour's approach to English devolution including powers for ministers to direct creation of strategic authorities and mandatory cabinet-style local governance. · No: Side with the Lords against the government — oppose the bill's centralising tendencies, including the lack of a statutory brownfield-first requirement for development and the mandatory imposition of leader-and-cabinet governance on local councils. | 270 | 171 | Yes |
All 22 divisions on this issue →
By party, the MPs whose voting record on local government is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.
LabLabour Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Jarvis | Barnsley North | 100% |
| Peter Kyle | Hove and Portslade | 100% |
| Rosena Allin-Khan | Tooting | 100% |
ConConservative and Unionist Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Geoffrey Cox | Torridge and Tavistock | 50% |
| Andrew Mitchell | Sutton Coldfield | 42% |
| Simon Hoare | North Dorset | 41% |
LDLiberal Democrats
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Danny Chambers | Winchester | 50% |
| Edward Morello | West Dorset | 50% |
| Luke Taylor | Sutton and Cheam | 50% |
LabLabour and Co-operative Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Seema Malhotra | Feltham and Heston | 100% |
| Steve Reed | Streatham and Croydon North | 80% |
| Lucy Powell | Manchester Central | 78% |
IndIndependent
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Karl Turner | Kingston upon Hull East | 100% |
| Diane Abbott | Hackney North and Stoke Newington | 69% |
| Iqbal Mohamed | Dewsbury and Batley | 69% |
RefReform UK
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pochin | Runcorn and Helsby | 43% |
| Lee Anderson | Ashfield | 33% |
| Nigel Farage | Clacton | 33% |
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Local Government” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.